Hows the quality on the 90-280 compared to 24-90?I've been owning and using the SL over the past 1.5 years. I've taken it together with both the 24-90mm & 90-280mm zooms on travels. Very reliable. Great sharpness & color rendering despite more bulk comparing to M rangefinder system. It is a camera system I'll keep to complement my Leica M system.
Both SL zooms compliment each other extending focal length from 24mm to 280mm. The 90-280mm is a useful range as a short to medium tell zoom lens. Over my ownership of more than 15mths, I use it more often than my 24-90mm. It has great contrast, beautiful color rendering, focusing speed is fast (faster than 24-90) and it is sharp. With firmware 3.0 the focus tracking works well in good lighting. AF struggles in low light and back lighting situations ( which happens to lots of AF lenses). With the IOS and good ISO range of SL, I only shoot handheld. Can be a little tiring after 4-5 hours of constant shoot as the lens is great egomaniacal but the weight still shows after extended usage. I love the lens. Now only my Noctilux and 21lux gets used on my SL occasionally, I apply the rest of my M lenses back up my M10 after recently acquiring it. Overall, my SL gets used more often than my M10.Hows the quality on the 90-280 compared to 24-90?