Lendlease REIT

reddevil0728

Great Supremacy Member
Joined
Dec 16, 2005
Messages
66,231
Reaction score
5,846
I think you missing the point not me.
I'm the shareholder of the REITs, so if the REITs is well manage, I will benefit.
The Group, although provide the pipeline for the REITs, but mostly for their own development. Not necessary provide every properties for the REITs.
Well then we can agree to disagree then.

to me, it’s in the interest of the SPONSOR which is the biggest shareholder of the reit for the reit to perform well.

so they have more skin in the game than you
 

durain

Master Member
Joined
Dec 22, 2002
Messages
4,152
Reaction score
845
if the group/sponsor can develop better properties etc, and the reit invest in it. Wouldn’t it be better for the reit?

Have to agree with the other guy. If i were a shareholder , I’d rather the reit acquire a “fresh” property at fair-value and grow it organically(like 313), as opposed to the group developing and selling to reit holders at premium valuation(like their stake in jem).

Plus on a group level, you cant expect him to devote the same amount of attention as if he were just solely in charge of the reit.
 

reddevil0728

Great Supremacy Member
Joined
Dec 16, 2005
Messages
66,231
Reaction score
5,846
Have to agree with the other guy. If i were a shareholder , I’d rather the reit acquire a “fresh” property at fair-value and grow it organically(like 313), as opposed to the group developing and selling to reit holders at premium valuation(like their stake in jem).

Plus on a group level, you cant expect him to devote the same amount of attention as if he were just solely in charge of the reit.
The Group should also think like a shareholder right?

in fact the biggest. So the will have more skin in the game that retail shareholders.
 

Andrew833

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Apr 7, 2017
Messages
17,452
Reaction score
6,056
Have to agree with the other guy. If i were a shareholder , I’d rather the reit acquire a “fresh” property at fair-value and grow it organically(like 313), as opposed to the group developing and selling to reit holders at premium valuation(like their stake in jem).

Plus on a group level, you cant expect him to devote the same amount of attention as if he were just solely in charge of the reit.
He just don't understand.
 

durain

Master Member
Joined
Dec 22, 2002
Messages
4,152
Reaction score
845
The Group should also think like a shareholder right?

in fact the biggest. So the will have more skin in the game that retail shareholders.

Not always the case , one case study for you to look at:

Lendlease Global Commercial Reit acquires stake in Jem

Lendlease group keeps 100% of the professional and acquisition fees. Sale adds 100% capital to lendlease goup, at the capital expense of its 25% stake in lendlease reit and 75% of shareholders.

end of the day, its not that the interests are misaligned, but you just need to know they are not always equally weighted, because of the "left pocket" "right pocket" nature of their relationship
 
Last edited:

reddevil0728

Great Supremacy Member
Joined
Dec 16, 2005
Messages
66,231
Reaction score
5,846
Not always the case , one case study for you to look at:

Lendlease Global Commercial Reit acquires stake in Jem

Lendlease group keeps 100% of the professional and acquisition fees. Sale adds 100% capital to lendlease goup, at the capital expense of its 25% stake in lendlease reit and 75% of shareholders.

end of the day, its not that the interests are misaligned, but you just need to know they are not always equally weighted, because of the "left pocket" "right pocket" nature of their relationship
I don’t disagree that it might not be equal weighted.

but chairman stepping down and becoming a member while taking up the role as GROUP CEO vs ASIA CEO previously. I think it will also be beneficial. Might be more so.

not as if chairman words are louder than other board members.
 

Andrew833

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Apr 7, 2017
Messages
17,452
Reaction score
6,056
I don’t disagree that it might not be equal weighted.

but chairman stepping down and becoming a member while taking up the role as GROUP CEO vs ASIA CEO previously. I think it will also be beneficial. Might be more so.

not as if chairman words are louder than other board members.
Lendlease REITs chairman takeover Group chairman cause old chairman retire.
Group hold only 25.5% of the REITs.

"not as if chairman words are louder than other board members." Then why there is a job for chairman? He lead the board lol. Please go and check City Development story.
 

reddevil0728

Great Supremacy Member
Joined
Dec 16, 2005
Messages
66,231
Reaction score
5,846
Lendlease REITs chairman takeover Group chairman cause old chairman retire.
Group hold only 25.5% of the REITs.

"not as if chairman words are louder than other board members." Then why there is a job for chairman? He lead the board lol. Please go and check City Development story.
Erm some of the stuff you say is not factually correct. So I can’t comment
 

Shion

Senior Mentor
Joined
Oct 24, 2008
Messages
375,305
Reaction score
121,827

Brokers' take: CGS-CIMB positive on Lendlease Reit on potential acquisition​


https://www.businesstimes.com.sg/co...ve-on-lendlease-reit-on-potential-acquisition
CGS-CIMB in a Tuesday report was positive on Lendlease Global Commercial Real Estate Investment Trust (LReit) after its recent inaugural issuance of perpetual securities, which the research house believes will mainly be used for potentially accretive acquisitions.

In May, the Reit issued S$200 million in perpetual securities at 4.2 per cent per annum, an upsize from its initial transaction of S$150 million with a tightened price from the initial guidance of 4.35 per cent, after strong demand led to oversubscription.

CGS-CIMB analysts Eing Kar Mei and Darren Ong said in the report: "The issuance of perp does not come as a total surprise given the relatively higher cost of equity in LReit, which makes accretive acquisitions difficult."

They believe that the issuance will go towards acquiring a second stake in integrated office and retail development Jem, one of its three right of first refusal assets in Singapore. The Reit had previously acquired a 5 per cent stake in Lendlease Asian Retail Investment Fund 3 Ltd, which holds 75 per cent of Jem.

CGS-CIMB has maintained "add" on LReit, with a raised target price of 86.9 Singapore cents, from 85.8 cents previously.

"Considering the amount of perp securities raised and estimated debt headroom of approximately S$120 million at 40 per cent gearing, we believe LReit could be looking at acquisitions sized S$200 million to S$300 million with gearing likely to be maintained below 40 per cent for acquisition flexibility in the future, Ms Eing and Mr Ong said.

LReit's main intention for that acquisition was to gain pre-emptive rights to increase its strategic stake in the fund over time if other investors were to divest their interests, the analysts added. They also noted that the Reit has no refinancing needs until FY2023.

A drop in shopper traffic and tenant sales due to Singapore's Phase 2 (Heightened Alert) restrictions will impact the performance of LReit's Orchard Road 313@Somerset property, due to its location and the fact that more than a third of the mall's FY20 gross rental income came from food & beverage outlets. Carpark vacancy has also seen a sharp increase.

However, the CGS-CIMB analysts do not expect the impact on the Reit's overall financial performance from potentially weaker-than-expected rental reversion to be substantial, as the leases will be spread out as and when leases are up for renewals.

As at Q3 FY2021, only 6 per cent and 20 per cent of leases by gross rental income were up for renewals in FY2021 and FY2022 respectively. In addition, about 60 per cent of the mall's net lettable area is embedded with annual rental escalations of about 3 per cent.

Rental rebates for its tenants will have a larger impact on the bottomline, the analysts said. "If LREIT gives out one month of rental rebates to all its tenants at 313, our FY2021 DPU (distribution per unit) will fall by 5.8 per cent." However, they added that LReit has not given out any since July 2020.

Furthermore, operational commencement of the Grange Road Carpark event space in 2022, which has brought the Reit many reverse leasing enquiries, will likely help to offset the slower recovery at 313@Somerset.

Units of LReit were trading flat at 76.5 Singapore cents as at 2pm on Wednesday.
 

Shion

Senior Mentor
Joined
Oct 24, 2008
Messages
375,305
Reaction score
121,827

Lendlease Global Reit proposes to raise stake in Jem to up to 31.8%​

https://www.businesstimes.com.sg/co...t-proposes-to-raise-stake-in-jem-to-up-to-318
LENDLEASE Global Commercial Reit has proposed to raise its stake in Jem mall to up to 31.8 per cent for a purchase consideration of between S$204.1 million and S$337.3 million, the manager said on Monday.

The Reit's trustee has entered into sale-and-purchase agreements with various vendors to acquire stakes in two private funds, Lendlease Jem Partners Fund Limited (LLJP) and Lendlease Asian Retail Investment Fund 3 Limited (ARIF3). They own 25 per cent and 75 per cent of Jem, respectively.

Lendlease Global Reit currently holds an indirect interest in Jem through its 5 per cent interest in ARIF3, acquired in October 2020.

On a pro-forma basis, assuming the acquisition was effective at the end of the first half of fiscal 2021, it would have boosted the Reit’s DPU by 3 per cent to 2.41 Singapore cents, from 2.34 cents. If the proposed deal was completed on Dec 31, 2020, net asset value per unit would have slid to 0.84 Singapore cents from 0.85 cents.

As part of the proposed acquisition, the Reit's trustee will acquire a 53 per cent interest in LLJP for S$159.1 million from third-party vendors. The trustee will also acquire a 5 per cent interest in ARIF3 from Lendlease International for S$45 million.

It may raise its stake in ARIF3 to 19.8 per cent from other third-party investors for S$178.2 million, assuming the amount paid to these investors does not exceed ARIF3's net asset value per share.

If the trustee acquired 19.8 per cent interest in ARIF3, the total acquisition cost will be S$347.1 million. The total acquisition cost comprises the purchase consideration of up to S$337.3 million, subject to post-completion adjustments, up to S$3.4 million acquisition fee payable to the manager, as well as up to S$6.4 million in other fees and expenses.

Post-completion, Lendlease Global Reit is expected to hold an effective 20.8 per cent to 31.8 per cent indirect interest in Jem.

The acquisition is based on Jem’s agreed property value of about S$2.08 billion, at a discount of around 0.4 per cent to S$2.09 billion - the higher of two independent valuations conducted on Jem by the manager and trustee.

The manager appointed CBRE, which valued Jem at S$2.06 billion, while the trustee appointed JLL, which valued Jem at S$2.09 billion.

The manager said the proposed deal will be funded through debt, or a combination of debt and proceeds from the issuance of perpetual securities. The proposed acquisition is also conditional on unitholders' approval and is expected to complete by Sept 30, 2021.

Kelvin Chow, chief executive of the manager, said the proposed acquisition will enhance Lendlease Global Reit's income diversification.

"The enlarged portfolio size of S$1.8 billion will have a diversified asset base and an increased exposure to more resilient suburban retail and decentralised office segments," he said.

Moreover, the single largest asset by aggregate value of the enlarged portfolio would also have decreased to 55.1 per cent from 67.6 per cent.

Jem is an integrated office and retail asset located at 50 and 52 Jurong Gateway Road, next to Jurong East MRT Station and bus interchange. It has six levels of retail space and 12 levels of office space, which has been fully leased to the Ministry of National Development of Singapore.

The property has a leasehold of 99 years that started on Sept 27, 2010, a gross floor area of about 1.2 million square feet (sq ft) and a net lettable area of 892,148 sq ft.

Reasons for the proposed acquisition include Jem’s strategic location and attractive market fundamentals, as well as the mall being a “resilient suburban asset with strong sustainability credentials”.

Units of Lendlease Global Reit closed at S$0.785 on Monday, up 1.95 per cent or S$0.015.
 

Nyan

Master Member
Joined
Jun 24, 2008
Messages
3,794
Reaction score
0
does anyone know whats the divided payout in august? considering to sell now and see if its worth it.
 

Andrew833

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Apr 7, 2017
Messages
17,452
Reaction score
6,056
does anyone know whats the divided payout in august? considering to sell now and see if its worth it.
2020 - 3 cents
2021 Feb - 2.3 cents
so Aug estimate is 0.7-1 cents
Just estimate only
 

reddevil0728

Great Supremacy Member
Joined
Dec 16, 2005
Messages
66,231
Reaction score
5,846
does anyone know whats the divided payout in august? considering to sell now and see if its worth it.
i don't think they provided any dividend guidance. last year not an accurate reflection.

Also will be cautious about the below poster's estimate cause in the past such question was asked, poster's basis seems to be plucked from the air and poster just say "is just an estimate" without any basis.
2020 - 3 cents
2021 Feb - 2.3 cents
so Aug estimate is 0.7-1 cents
Just estimate only
 

Andrew833

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Apr 7, 2017
Messages
17,452
Reaction score
6,056
i don't think they provided any dividend guidance. last year not an accurate reflection.

Also will be cautious about the below poster's estimate cause in the past such question was asked, poster's basis seems to be plucked from the air and poster just say "is just an estimate" without any basis.
If you can't base on history figure, then there should not be any prediction, forecast, estimate etc for stock price, price movement etc... You can also throw away all the FA and TA, as these are base on history.
In this case, there will not be a stock market.

If you can't answer the question ask, don't bother to reply other ppl answer!!!!! That answer is not meant for you to see.
 

reddevil0728

Great Supremacy Member
Joined
Dec 16, 2005
Messages
66,231
Reaction score
5,846
If you can't base on history figure, then there should not be any prediction, forecast, estimate etc for stock price, price movement etc... You can also throw away all the FA and TA, as these are base on history.
In this case, there will not be a stock market.

If you can't answer the question ask, don't bother to reply other ppl answer!!!!! That answer is not meant for you to see.
Well, context matters.

The 1H dividend was paid prior to **. 2H was paid after.

they also pulled their dividend guidance.

so for one to just state historical payout without context and just say it’s an estimate, not very meaningful.
 
Last edited:
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ Forums. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts. Please refer to our Community Guidelines and Standards and Terms and Conditions for more information.
Top