evildoer
Arch-Supremacy Member
- Joined
- Mar 11, 2007
- Messages
- 23,653
- Reaction score
- 4,089
“For the Opposition to have enough resources ... you need to have at least 20 Members of Parliament to have enough people to keep watch on the Government,” he said in response to a question as the WP began introducing its election candidates yesterday.
I always been a sarporker of opposition party... Can check moi pass post if u doubt. moi no PAP IB. I kept thing why he said at least 20.. why not at least 1/3 to be at least effective ? why did he choose to field only 28 members ?
whats are Worker party up to ? They seem to me they don't not want to help stop any harmful changes to the current legislation. They seem to be they are trying to be a co driver that do not want to pull the brake. Just to slap the driver and claim to be "check and Balance" after that...
Example : Lets just said only WP 28 members got erected, If GST were to up 10%, they will all vote not but they don't not vote to stop it. Then next erection they can claim they fight very hard for your clause..
Just like someone who want to see the accident happen , then point the finger at the driver and look good...
I always been a sarporker of opposition party... Can check moi pass post if u doubt. moi no PAP IB. I kept thing why he said at least 20.. why not at least 1/3 to be at least effective ? why did he choose to field only 28 members ?
whats are Worker party up to ? They seem to me they don't not want to help stop any harmful changes to the current legislation. They seem to be they are trying to be a co driver that do not want to pull the brake. Just to slap the driver and claim to be "check and Balance" after that...
Example : Lets just said only WP 28 members got erected, If GST were to up 10%, they will all vote not but they don't not vote to stop it. Then next erection they can claim they fight very hard for your clause..
Just like someone who want to see the accident happen , then point the finger at the driver and look good...

