This tries to emulate the structure of CPF Life but CPFL is way better
Under CPFL, if a person under Standard Plan dies early, he (and his beneficiaries) only gets back his principal with no interest. But if he lives a long life, CPFL keeps paying for life so there is potential for significant upside
In Manulife's scheme, if the person dies b4 the 8th year, he only gets back his principal plus a tiny bit of interest. But even if he lives to 100, he only gets max 9 payouts and a max roi of 4%. Why gamble on living at least the next 9 years just to get a 4% return with no liquidity? As a cash investment, the loss of liquidity is likely not a worthwhile trade-off.
The main scenario where this product might have some attraction is where a person with substantial srs savings is planning to drawdown his srs. Since the tax-beneficial method of withdrawing srs is over a period of up to 10 yrs, there is no loss of liquidity. A person with say, srs savings of $298,000 would get back $40,081 each year which he could withdraw tax-free. Main risk would be mortality during the 9 years of Manulife payout which would reduce the ROI to ard 1%, which btw is still better than the measly 0.05% being offered by the banks on srs funds