bakuganboy
Master Member
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2011
- Messages
- 4,742
- Reaction score
- 1,561
Peanut lah, if everytime profit, then u worry
Maybe is earn lesserHow does a central bank post loss?
Yes I read the article. Just for your education. The key word to look for here is translation. When they referred to the loss from FX, they stated that it was a negative FX translation effect.It is in the articles. i am only assuming how they had the fx lost that all.
pls read the articles.
yes hold foreign currencies cash bonds for liquidity purposes , but why didn't hedge FX risk with derivatives ??Yes I read the article. Just for your education. The key word to look for here is translation. When they referred to the loss from FX, they stated that it was a negative FX translation effect.
This is not a realised loss. It’s a loss from translation. So for example if in Jan you held S$100 of Yen bonds. Then in Dec Yen depreciated 20% against SGD. Your Yen bonds (assuming no other gains or losses) would be worth S$80. However in Yen terms it is still worth the same. That is the FX translation effect. Hope this clarifies.
in terms of investment returns, MAS actually made $4bn during the period. An FX translation loss is less of a concern than an actual investment loss because a big part of MAS’ job is currency control. They do this by buying a basket of currencies against SGD. So inevitably, there would be some FX gains or losses during the period because MAS will always be holding on to a basket of currencies. In order to avoid this loss MAS would need to either sell the currencies or do some hedging. The former is undesirable because MAS would just end up devaluing the SGD which is not what we want. The latter is also not desirable because at the size that MAS is managing it would counteract some of the effects of FX controls. Hope this clarifies.
i understand what you said. a loss is still lost whether it is realised or not. as no one know when MAS would sell or hold for how long. will MAS never sell? Paper lost is still a loss at least at this moment.Yes I read the article. Just for your education. The key word to look for here is translation. When they referred to the loss from FX, they stated that it was a negative FX translation effect.
This is not a realised loss. It’s a loss from translation. So for example if in Jan you held S$100 of Yen bonds. Then in Dec Yen depreciated 20% against SGD. Your Yen bonds (assuming no other gains or losses) would be worth S$80. However in Yen terms it is still worth the same. That is the FX translation effect. Hope this clarifies.
in terms of investment returns, MAS actually made $4bn during the period. An FX translation loss is less of a concern than an actual investment loss because a big part of MAS’ job is currency control. They do this by buying a basket of currencies against SGD. So inevitably, there would be some FX gains or losses during the period because MAS will always be holding on to a basket of currencies. In order to avoid this loss MAS would need to either sell the currencies or do some hedging. The former is undesirable because MAS would just end up devaluing the SGD which is not what we want. The latter is also not desirable because at the size that MAS is managing it would counteract some of the effects of FX controls. Hope this clarifies.
i understand what you said. a loss is still lost whether it is realised or not. as no one know when MAS would sell or hold for how long. will MAS never sell? Paper lost is still a loss at least at this moment.
in your third para... it is exactly what i said if you pay attention and not choose and pick just 1 of my post.
as such your clarification is not require.
this is the beginning for MAS to lose big and bigger.
cronies always a cronies.
Yes I read the article. Just for your education. The key word to look for here is translation. When they referred to the loss from FX, they stated that it was a negative FX translation effect.
This is not a realised loss. It’s a loss from translation. So for example if in Jan you held S$100 of Yen bonds. Then in Dec Yen depreciated 20% against SGD. Your Yen bonds (assuming no other gains or losses) would be worth S$80. However in Yen terms it is still worth the same. That is the FX translation effect. Hope this clarifies.
in terms of investment returns, MAS actually made $4bn during the period. An FX translation loss is less of a concern than an actual investment loss because a big part of MAS’ job is currency control. They do this by buying a basket of currencies against SGD. So inevitably, there would be some FX gains or losses during the period because MAS will always be holding on to a basket of currencies. In order to avoid this loss MAS would need to either sell the currencies or do some hedging. The former is undesirable because MAS would just end up devaluing the SGD which is not what we want. The latter is also not desirable because at the size that MAS is managing it would counteract some of the effects of FX controls. Hope this clarifies.
like what you said, appreciating currency has it pro and cons. if you are manufacturing base in SG, it is not a good news.Don't think it's possible to have your cake and eat it too. MAS deliberately took the paper loss when they made the SGD higher to combat inflation - which by the way is way higher in other countries.
The stronger SGD allows us to buy our imported goods (food) at a cheaper rate.
But nothing is free, it results in a paper loss for the foreign currency that MAS holds, I.e. the so called negative translation
Read HWZ Forum Rules!
I am very surprised the MAS post $7.4 billion annual loss.
The Monetary Authority of Singapore has sole control over the printing of all banknotes within the country. When printing money, MAS must consider inflation, interest rates, and currency devaluation.
Hasn’t the MAS (Monetary Authority of Singapore) been printing enough banknotes, money ?
How money MAS prints every month, every year? 500 million dollars a month?
The foreigners working in Singapore have earned a lot of money through Singapore Government ( PAP) given jobs, They have earned most of the money being printed in the MAS.
How much money is being kept in GIC? How many billons dollars? 200 billion dollars?
How much money is being kept in the Singapore Cash Reserves? 300 billion dollars?
How is the cash being drawn ( $30 billion dollars for Covid19 relief ) from the Singapore Cash Reserves is to be replenished back into the Reserves?
How much money is being kept in Temasek Holdings? And how it is managed? Monthly? Annually ?
Why doesn’t the MAS print more money every month to make up for the current annual loss?
Thank you very much.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++