MBH/A35 alternatives

simsim1234

Banned
Joined
Jul 16, 2022
Messages
59
Reaction score
22
All stated above already. Depending on your needs, you should choose what works best for you. Regardless with yield curve flattening now, Tbills and/or short duration bond funds should work well.
Why no bond ETF that will hold bonds until maturity before recycling? I hate the bond fund managers actively trading and trying to act smart by selling before maturity (when they are not supposed to).
 

s0crates

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 15, 2015
Messages
1,652
Reaction score
542
Why no bond ETF that will hold bonds until maturity before recycling? I hate the bond fund managers actively trading and trying to act smart by selling before maturity (when they are not supposed to).

They are just following the fund mandate. Even if they actively trade they are following the mandate. read your fund prospectus to know better.
 

jayou8

Member
Joined
May 7, 2007
Messages
304
Reaction score
184
With the yield of SSB SBNOV22 around 3.2%, these bond funds really looking extremely unattractive now. Anyone still actively looking at these and what are your targets to get in?
 

reddevil0728

Great Supremacy Member
Joined
Dec 16, 2005
Messages
66,239
Reaction score
5,849
With the yield of SSB SBNOV22 around 3.2%, these bond funds really looking extremely unattractive now. Anyone still actively looking at these and what are your targets to get in?
Technically no depending on time horizon.

because when price is also lower, so might be the best time to load up. And when the time comes for a rate cut, this might in fact increase.

so all depends on time horizon
 

d5dude

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2006
Messages
14,246
Reaction score
5,631
With the yield of SSB SBNOV22 around 3.2%, these bond funds really looking extremely unattractive now. Anyone still actively looking at these and what are your targets to get in?

SSB cap is only 200k, and monthly allocation is usually very low, I think bonds/bond funds still serve a purpose.
 

jayou8

Member
Joined
May 7, 2007
Messages
304
Reaction score
184
SSB cap is only 200k, and monthly allocation is usually very low, I think bonds/bond funds still serve a purpose.

But if I look at the current on the run SGS with duration of 5-8 years left, they still look much attractive. no?
 

reddevil0728

Great Supremacy Member
Joined
Dec 16, 2005
Messages
66,239
Reaction score
5,849
But if I look at the current on the run SGS with duration of 5-8 years left, they still look much attractive. no?
It might be easier to sell MBH/A35 than to sell a SGS Bond, because of liquidity.

the transaction cost and the spread too. need to take all that into consideration if you cannot hold
 

BBCWatcher

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2010
Messages
24,510
Reaction score
5,553
Nikko AM will probably publish updated weighted YTM figures for MBH soon (through September 30, 2022), but my back-of-the-envelope calculations suggest that MBH is right about where you'd expect it to be with a materially higher weighted YTM than comparable tenor SGSes. Otherwise the bond market would be broken, and it's not often broken.

A35 is really only a way to invest in SGSes in an alternative and sometimes convenient fashion. But you'll pay a little for the convenience.
 

CaptainWu

Senior Member
Joined
May 18, 2019
Messages
1,195
Reaction score
235
MBH probably with yield near 4% with the current price. Not bad with a pretty safe investment on IB bonds and with the liquality.
 

s0crates

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 15, 2015
Messages
1,652
Reaction score
542
MBH probably with yield near 4% with the current price. Not bad with a pretty safe investment on IB bonds and with the liquality.
Pretty safe? I thought people would have been a bit cautious to use the word safe for bond funds after the markets schooled them on duration risk lol.
 

reddevil0728

Great Supremacy Member
Joined
Dec 16, 2005
Messages
66,239
Reaction score
5,849
Pretty safe? I thought people would have been a bit cautious to use the word safe for bond funds after the markets schooled them on duration risk lol.
depends on your definition of safe? safe can be the underlying are almost capital protected? because of the fact that they are holding AAA government bond?.

like the underlying don't default.
 

s0crates

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 15, 2015
Messages
1,652
Reaction score
542
depends on your definition of safe? safe can be the underlying are almost capital protected? because of the fact that they are holding AAA government bond?.

like the underlying don't default.

Yea of course. My point is that I rather hold a junk bond that is due in 3 months than a AAA SGS bond fund with a super long duration, and that should be the case for most people too.

Safety from duration risk should be considered more than credit rating.
 
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ Forums. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts. Please refer to our Community Guidelines and Standards and Terms and Conditions for more information.
Top