Micro ATX vs ATX board

royfrosty

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Jul 23, 2009
Messages
27,727
Reaction score
1,553
Aesthetic wise atx looks more nicer to see. But there are high end matx board like Asus do looks good.

Well it depends on your needs. Matx has more pcie slots and 16x slot for GPU. Possible to have 4 way multi GPU. Whereas matx does not.

If I'm not wrong matx lacks msata support also.

And iirc matx board lacks of power phrases than atx board. But there are budget atx board that has lesser power phrases also.
 

Rocket3

Senior Member
Joined
May 18, 2012
Messages
1,354
Reaction score
45
Aesthetic wise atx looks more nicer to see. But there are high end matx board like Asus do looks good.

Well it depends on your needs. Matx has more pcie slots and 16x slot for GPU. Possible to have 4 way multi GPU. Whereas matx does not.

If I'm not wrong matx lacks msata support also.

And iirc matx board lacks of power phrases than atx board. But there are budget atx board that has lesser power phrases also.
:s22: Confusing sentence.
 

echutah

Member
Joined
Nov 20, 2007
Messages
388
Reaction score
1
so a gaming/programming PC which board is more recommended

Depends how many additional slots you need for xfire/sli/soundcards etc

If running 1 or no external gpu then can save some money by buying matx

If purchasing matx case your pc will run hotter as well.. but prob not much of an issue
 
Last edited:

jtjt00

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2000
Messages
17,660
Reaction score
510
Should be like this:

atx has more pcie slots and 16x slot for GPU. Possible to have 4 way multi GPU. Whereas matx does not
 

jtjt00

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2000
Messages
17,660
Reaction score
510
For gaming, stick to ATX mobo and ATX casing. Can't be wrong.
 

royfrosty

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Jul 23, 2009
Messages
27,727
Reaction score
1,553
Not really true to that. Min if you think about expansion is min 2 pcie x16 slot. 2x pcie x1 slot 1 for sound card 1 for internet wifi.
 

haylui

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Jul 18, 2006
Messages
29,769
Reaction score
91
if price difference is below $50 better get atx
more PCI-e slots are better
 

iAmBored

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 22, 2012
Messages
755
Reaction score
0
got space constraint?
If not, then go atx.
If yes:
- Do you need a dedicated sound card?
If yes, go Matx
If no, go mini itx

BTW, Asus Max VI Impact is itx and has sort of a dedicated sound card also.
 

tensaixp

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 28, 2008
Messages
733
Reaction score
0
For better heat dissipation and air flow too. Not to mention easier to fix up for ppl with big hands like me. Usually more usb ports.
 

coyote

Greater Supremacy Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2000
Messages
85,115
Reaction score
28,580
Most people will use either one or zero pcie slot for graphic card. So even a mini itx suffices. Unless you have an expensive speakers system, with or without pcie sound card, very little difference.

mAtx and Atx allow more space to accommodate more sophisticated power phase compared to mini Itx. Those will matter only if you put power hungry processors in it, otherwise not that relevant to most users.

Since Atx is a little more expensive due to the more features, micro Atx is best bang for buck. Mini itx charges more for their effort to squeeze everything into a tight space. Economic consideration, go micro Atx.

Aesthetic wise, it's subjective. Some believe only gigantic chassis is cool. Some think tiny itx chassis is cool. Personal preferences.
 
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ Forums. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts. Please refer to our Community Guidelines and Standards and Terms and Conditions for more information.
Top