The report by MND is out. I will refrain from commenting on the report for now as I have yet to read through and analysis the contents. But here it is nevertheless.
MND report
MND report
For a review that's done by MND, this is as good as it gets liao lah. I didn't expect anything that would be remotely critical, but what surprised me was the fact that MND actually highlighted the need for TCs to evolve and the never ending tension between TCs and HDB which is a very fair point.
Personally, I had faced with this issue recently where I had the HDB and TC finger point each other. And I'm not living in an opposition estate..
So the AIM saga is concluded liao ah?
everything is okay?
But seriously, you mean you had expected MND to criticise their political masters???That is just a distraction from the core of the report.
Of course la, if got problems also will not tell us
But seriously, you mean you had expected MND to criticise their political masters???
The can of worms finally opened in Parliament yesterday and what a big can.
Bottom line from yesterday is, the rule on conflict of interest does not apply in its entirety as far as TC is concerned. If you read the report, AIM's bid was simply too good to be true and it has been acknowledged that AIM had the backing of PAP to make this offer and WP has been using a company (FM Services) with links to them. If we go strictly by AGO's and IM guidelines, even if there is no material benefits and one is doing a 'social' service, it is still a conflict of interest and the reason for such a strong line against it within the civil service is the probability that it is slippery slope to something more unsavory. Interesting and more interesting.
I wonder how MND's definition goes with CPIB's. Not saying that there is anything wrong, but CPIB's definition seems to be different...
The can of worms finally opened in Parliament yesterday and what a big can.
Bottom line from yesterday is, the rule on conflict of interest does not apply in its entirety as far as TC is concerned. If you read the report, AIM's bid was simply too good to be true and it has been acknowledged that AIM had the backing of PAP to make this offer and WP has been using a company (FM Services) with links to them. If we go strictly by AGO's and IM guidelines, even if there is no material benefits and one is doing a 'social' service, it is still a conflict of interest and the reason for such a strong line against it within the civil service is the probability that it is slippery slope to something more unsavory. Interesting and more interesting.