Mobile Processor Raw Power

[CrispyPeddler]

Kinda out of touch from the mobile arena. Just wanna ask in term of "RAW POWER"...which chip now leading? A11? 845? Kirin 970?

 

[Audiology93]

Kinda out of touch from the mobile arena. Just wanna ask in term of "RAW POWER"...which chip now leading? A11? 845? Kirin 970?

A11 > 9810 > 845 > 970

Sent from HUAWEI MATE 10 using GAGT

 

[ZrE0_Cha0s]

A11 > 9810 > 845 > 970

Sent from HUAWEI MATE 10 using GAGT

NV heard of 9810 processor...By which company?

 

[lohsenglte]

NV heard of 9810 processor...By which company?

Exynos 9810. Samsung.

 

[Audiology93]

NV heard of 9810 processor...By which company?

Samsung Exynos 9810. Currently used in the S9 and S9 Plus for SG.

Sent from HUAWEI MATE 10 using GAGT

 

[ZrE0_Cha0s]

oh haha my bad XD cos i rmb the whole length of the chip set rather than just number

like Apple A11, Samsung Exynos 9810, SD 845. Kirin 970

 

[cscs3]

oh haha my bad XD cos i rmb the whole length of the chip set rather than just number

like Apple A11, Samsung Exynos 9810, SD 845. Kirin 970

Krin 970 basically driven by Cortex A53 core.

 

[watzup_ken]

A11 > 9810 > 845 > 970

Sent from HUAWEI MATE 10 using GAGT

Exynos 9810 may not be as fast as the SD 845 and even Kirin 970. In some benchmarks, it seems fast, but in real world usage, the processor throttles a lot and not properly optimized.

 

[watzup_ken]

Krin 970 basically driven by Cortex A53 core.

Its an octa core SOC, not that different from the previous gen SD 835. Not sure what you mean when specs show that it's driven by a combination of A73 and A53. Benchmark result wise, it only loses in GPU against the SD 835. Unless you mean to say SD 835 is also basically driven by A53.

 

[Audiology93]

Krin 970 basically driven by Cortex A53 core.

4x A73 and 4x A53. A73 do all the intensive work but the A53 handle the light task.

Exynos 9810 may not be as fast as the SD 845 and even Kirin 970. In some benchmarks, it seems fast, but in real world usage, the processor throttles a lot and not properly optimized.

I only took into account the CPU power. If comparing GPU, the 845>9810. But if comparing just CPU, 9810 is faster.

Sent from HUAWEI MATE 10 using GAGT

 

[CrispyPeddler]

Exynos 9810 may not be as fast as the SD 845 and even Kirin 970. In some benchmarks, it seems fast, but in real world usage, the processor throttles a lot and not properly optimized.

so in your opinion SD845 still the best? aside from A11...im looking for phone with high battery endurance, fast charge, speed and durability....mate10pro p20pro one+5T/6 samsung s9+

 

[Audiology93]

so in your opinion SD845 still the best? aside from A11...im looking for phone with high battery endurance, fast charge, speed and durability....mate10pro p20pro one+5T/6 samsung s9+

High battery endurance, you're only left with 845. S9 and S9 Plus with 9810 have many issues especially battery life draining if you've visited the S9 thread.

Sent from HUAWEI MATE 10 using GAGT

 

[Hailgod]

sd 845 > ex 9810 > sd835 = kr970 > sd821 > sd820 > kr960 > sd660 > sd636 > sd625 = kr659

honestly anything above the sd 660 is very good and have very little difference in app opening times.

Sent from Xiaomi REDMI NOTE 5 using GAGT