[mobo] Intel Skylake details....

MoneyFace =p

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Dec 17, 2010
Messages
35,380
Reaction score
402
Intel-Skylake-Platform-Details1.jpg


Info from another local forum speculate this year's current Haswell Refresh and upcoming Broadwell will be a rather short-living platform...

Deja Vu ar..... Nehalem/Westmere.... Oregon-made......


But the presence of LGA chips is still good news for all! Skylake im coming!
 

Gattberserk

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Jan 26, 2008
Messages
10,590
Reaction score
901

MoneyFace =p

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Dec 17, 2010
Messages
35,380
Reaction score
402
Seems to me that Intel is trying to fit the new LGA1151 Skylake platform between our usual mainstream platform and HEDT platform.

Intel is smart enough to equip with more PCIe 3.0 lanes and other features (and perhaps label them with higher price tag) to entice people who wants the best of a quad core system.

By choosing to release both microarch in the same year, they both tackle audience wanting to upgrade from Haswell (to broadwell), as well as from anywhere Ivy Bridge and older (to a brand new Skylake).
 

KWSW

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2000
Messages
31,436
Reaction score
3
Finally can look forward to upgrading my rig!
 

daniel798

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 11, 2010
Messages
561
Reaction score
0
I though it was supposed to be broadwell-k and skylake non-k first...

Anyway still need to add ddr4 prices for skylake builds. Hope it will go down by then
 

trenzterra

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Sep 18, 2002
Messages
20,628
Reaction score
516
Interesting. Reminds me of socket 754 and 939 with amd last time
 

MoneyFace =p

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Dec 17, 2010
Messages
35,380
Reaction score
402
I though it was supposed to be broadwell-k and skylake non-k first...

Anyway still need to add ddr4 prices for skylake builds. Hope it will go down by then
It still holds true, glad that Skylake-K is coming much earlier than i thought.

Skylake seems to support both DDR3 & 4 IIRC.

Unfortunately, looking at the past trend of DDR 1, 2 and 3, DDR4 price will not hit bottom until at least Cannonlake and beyond... :(
 

Gattberserk

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Jan 26, 2008
Messages
10,590
Reaction score
901
It still holds true, glad that Skylake-K is coming much earlier than i thought.

Skylake seems to support both DDR3 & 4 IIRC.

Unfortunately, looking at the past trend of DDR 1, 2 and 3, DDR4 price will not hit bottom until at least Cannonlake and beyond... :(

Skylake K is going to make everyone happy... Cant imagine there is no OC in the first lineup for Skylake S, liddat Z170 board will have no uses in the market.


And we will be back to the primitive BCLK OCing again... Thankfully now we don't have to.
 

trenzterra

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Sep 18, 2002
Messages
20,628
Reaction score
516
what happened with those 2 socket? skylake socket is different from broadwell socket yes?

The Socket 754/940 was introduced in around Sep/Oct 2003 as a stopgap solution for the Athlon 64 (FX) before they were replaced by Socket 939 just 8 to 9 months later. In this case, seems like Broadwell is a stopgap for Skylake as well.

I was on 754 and it sucked because you could hardly find a PCI-Express mobo for it when it became mainstream in 2005.
 

Gattberserk

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Jan 26, 2008
Messages
10,590
Reaction score
901
skylake socket is different from broadwell socket yes?

Yes different, the chipset they use is radically different in connectivity so yes a change in MB is mandatory if u are upgrading from a haswell.


I do have a bad news, it look like we are stuck with Skylake for at least 3 years, given 14nm just out and is already in the Intel tock phase. 10nm wont be coming next year that is for (very damn) sure.
 

trenzterra

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Sep 18, 2002
Messages
20,628
Reaction score
516
Yes different, the chipset they use is radically different in connectivity so yes a change in MB is mandatory if u are upgrading from a haswell.


I do have a bad news, it look like we are stuck with Skylake for at least 3 years, given 14nm just out and is already in the Intel tock phase. 10nm wont be coming next year that is for (very damn) sure.

Yep. But thankfully Intel did some much-needed futureproofing with Skylake. With USB 3.1 on the horizon and other things needing lots of PCI-E bandwidth, I'm glad they increased the number of lanes etc.

To me I don't mind progress slowing a little: it's damn sian when one component spoils and you realise you have to change everything because you can't find replacement parts... forced obsolescence, so to speak.

It's amazing how Intel is already at 14nm whereas everyone else is still struggling to get on 20nm... AMD has been at 28nm for god knows how long. I wonder how long Intel can sustain tick-tock. 10nm and beyond seems hard.
 

Gattberserk

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Jan 26, 2008
Messages
10,590
Reaction score
901
Yep. But thankfully Intel did some much-needed futureproofing with Skylake. With USB 3.1 on the horizon and other things needing lots of PCI-E bandwidth, I'm glad they increased the number of lanes etc.

To me I don't mind progress slowing a little: it's damn sian when one component spoils and you realise you have to change everything because you can't find replacement parts... forced obsolescence, so to speak.

It's amazing how Intel is already at 14nm whereas everyone else is still struggling to get on 20nm... AMD has been at 28nm for god knows how long. I wonder how long Intel can sustain tick-tock. 10nm and beyond seems hard.

Samsung + global foundry are less than a year away from Intel in process node just fyi. Intel need to speed up or else they will be overtaken
 

killerslayer92

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 28, 2007
Messages
1,061
Reaction score
0
Yep. But thankfully Intel did some much-needed futureproofing with Skylake. With USB 3.1 on the horizon and other things needing lots of PCI-E bandwidth, I'm glad they increased the number of lanes etc.

To me I don't mind progress slowing a little: it's damn sian when one component spoils and you realise you have to change everything because you can't find replacement parts... forced obsolescence, so to speak.

It's amazing how Intel is already at 14nm whereas everyone else is still struggling to get on 20nm... AMD has been at 28nm for god knows how long. I wonder how long Intel can sustain tick-tock. 10nm and beyond seems hard.

its cos of tsmc... too happy on 28nm cos the longer u stay there the better the yields hence more profit.

but yea intel shldnt slow.. samsung using 16nm finfet
 

Piezoq

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
1,567
Reaction score
0
Samsung + global foundry are less than a year away from Intel in process node just fyi. Intel need to speed up or else they will be overtaken

Intel spent 2014 ironing out yield issues on 14nm. It looks like the other foundries will face similar challenges in volume production at 16nm.

Broadwell (14nm) limited availability in end 2014. I wonder when we'll see the first 16nm silicone product. Perhaps 2016.

Are there any 20nm products other than the Iphone currently?
 
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ Forums. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts. Please refer to our Community Guidelines and Standards and Terms and Conditions for more information.
Top