Mod working hard to ban me :)

michael_thm

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2000
Messages
22,030
Reaction score
2,721
Like that also can receive infraction?

This is what I posted...

actually it is not hard truth but intolerable truth to EDMWers.

EDMWers are champions of democracy who cannot accept it when the candidate they prefer lose. After their choice lose, they will hurl all sort of insults and make all sort of snide remarks. And at the same time, they imagine Singapore will be a kinder and better place (refer back to previous sentence for the irony) if they get their way.

The truth of my comment is evident if you simply see the number of threads insulting the "70%" day in day out.

The reason given was...
Trolling with generic label like EDMWers. You are posting, aren't you an EDMWer too?

Does that make sense? These EDMWers who keep insulting Singaporeans (the 70%) are Singaporeans too and they can refuse to identify with Singaporeans by making comments about how stupid Singaporeans are... why are they not infracted for trolling then?

And I cannot refuse to identify with EDMWers?
 

michael_thm

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2000
Messages
22,030
Reaction score
2,721
At the same time... I received an infraction for...

Same here. Voted PAP for a better reason.

EDMWers are stupid.
EDMWers prefer SDP and other rubbish candidates (excluding WP).
Therefore I vote for PAP instead. :D

I would have preferred to vote WP because EDMWers are anti WP too. :)

Not trying his best to issue infraction?

And on 10/06/2016,

I received an infraction for "Forum Nuisance (clone account)"

OMFG this account is 20yrs old and I have never hidden even my real name... the name and initial form this username you know? And the so called clone account never interacted with this username for any purpose. Therefore what is the purpose of the "clone account"? :s11:

What happened was merely I posted without realizing someone's else account was logged in on the computer. However I didn't even bother to fight the infraction because I know Kiwi8 was determined to find any reason to infract me for calling him out for accusing another forumer of being a PAP IB. Is that becoming behaviour of a moderator anyway? Should moderators be calling other users PAP IBs without evidence? :s11:

And yet I was given an infraction on 07-05-2016

reported this thread to check if the SDP IB mod is still running EDMW and allowing his buddies to insult fellow forumers.

The reason being it is offensive to call kiwi8 SDP IB mod.

Making frivolous complaints about SDP IB mod again when there is no such mod

Let me get it right... it is okay for a mod to call someone else "PAP IB" but it is not okay for me to call him a "SDP IB mod"? :s11:

Isn't the string of infractions I have received monthly in the last 3 months clearly an attempt at forum bullying? :s8:
 
Last edited:

michael_thm

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2000
Messages
22,030
Reaction score
2,721
Calling EDMWers stupid is more serious than calling EDMWers siaolang?

If horsepeter no wifi, how you think edmw got so many siaolangs who managed to post when they are in imh.

Day in day out, such comments are made and no infraction are given.

I am not trying to make a complaint about cute_togepi. I am using his post as an example that comments by EDMWers about EDMWers are a dime a dozen with no action taken for something which clearly would be ridiculous to take seriously.

And I can receive multiple infractions for comments which are no more offensive? What is the logic?
 

michael_thm

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2000
Messages
22,030
Reaction score
2,721
I want to be clear that I am only disputing the 2 infractions that I received today for comments which are well within the norms. I didn't push the envelope of decent behaviour on EDMW. My comments were similar to many others but yet I was targeted.
 

a&w_rootbeerz

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Jul 21, 2013
Messages
45,067
Reaction score
4
Hello michael_thm bro how are you! :D

Wah didn't know you join this forum in 1996. You the most lao jiao! :D
 

Dragon

*
Administrator
Joined
Jan 1, 2000
Messages
37,611
Reaction score
1,540
I want to be clear that I am only disputing the 2 infractions that I received today for comments which are well within the norms. I didn't push the envelope of decent behaviour on EDMW. My comments were similar to many others but yet I was targeted.

Thank you for your feedback. The admins will be looking into the matter. :)

We definitely do not condone moderators that are politically biased and misuse their privileges.
 

bosssaizo

Senior Moderator
Senior Moderator
Joined
Jun 2, 2015
Messages
19,557
Reaction score
39
after reviewing:

Same here. Voted PAP for a better reason.

EDMWers are stupid.
EDMWers prefer SDP and other rubbish candidates (excluding WP).
Therefore I vote for PAP instead. :D

I would have preferred to vote WP because EDMWers are anti WP too. :)

Infraction type change to inappropriate language.

actually it is not hard truth but intolerable truth to EDMWers.

EDMWers are champions of democracy who cannot accept it when the candidate they prefer lose. After their choice lose, they will hurl all sort of insults and make all sort of snide remarks. And at the same time, they imagine Singapore will be a kinder and better place (refer back to previous sentence for the irony) if they get their way. :s13:

Infractions for the above quote reversed.
 

ten_david197

Banned
Joined
Apr 10, 2009
Messages
15,872
Reaction score
2
michael_thm, unfortunately many a times some EDMWers will report posts based purely on who posts it, not the nature of the post.

So, if you have been made a target, then good luck to you.
 

runforyourlife

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Sep 17, 2011
Messages
47,245
Reaction score
5,235
At the same time... I received an infraction for...



Not trying his best to issue infraction?

And on 10/06/2016,

I received an infraction for "Forum Nuisance (clone account)"

OMFG this account is 20yrs old and I have never hidden even my real name... the name and initial form this username you know? And the so called clone account never interacted with this username for any purpose. Therefore what is the purpose of the "clone account"? :s11:

What happened was merely I posted without realizing someone's else account was logged in on the computer. However I didn't even bother to fight the infraction because I know Kiwi8 was determined to find any reason to infract me for calling him out for accusing another forumer of being a PAP IB. Is that becoming behaviour of a moderator anyway? Should moderators be calling other users PAP IBs without evidence? :s11:

And yet I was given an infraction on 07-05-2016



The reason being it is offensive to call kiwi8 SDP IB mod.



Let me get it right... it is okay for a mod to call someone else "PAP IB" but it is not okay for me to call him a "SDP IB mod"? :s11:

Isn't the string of infractions I have received monthly in the last 3 months clearly an attempt at forum bullying? :s8:

Ok i have some time today. The only plausible explanation for "edmwers are stupid" definitely warrants an infraction (key: should users report) cos its an insult.

For the siaolang post if you feel insulted you can also report the post. Remember the key is user reports AND nature of the post, the mods cannot be around to view every thread every reply lei.

Oops: didn't know boss and dragon replied:eek:
 

cybercom8

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2001
Messages
23,995
Reaction score
5
Thank you for your feedback. The admins will be looking into the matter. :)

We definitely do not condone moderators that are politically biased and misuse their privileges.

didn't realise got such satki mods around...no wonder called dragon :o
 

runforyourlife

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Sep 17, 2011
Messages
47,245
Reaction score
5,235
huh? why is it untrue? i have seen those "gangs" openly encouraging each other to report posts to get certain members banned

Ya.... But mods also not stupid to see black/white one lei. Those whom cant won't be condoned wor, you neh see Dragon's tok kong reply? :D
 

wadsad

Greater Supremacy Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2006
Messages
80,363
Reaction score
6,584
huh? why is it untrue? i have seen those "gangs" openly encouraging each other to report posts to get certain members banned

mods no brain? ppl say ban they will ban? like that people always tell pap ib to die, pap ib got go die?
 

michael_thm

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2000
Messages
22,030
Reaction score
2,721
mods no brain? ppl say ban they will ban? like that people always tell pap ib to die, pap ib got go die?

Not mods no brain, is mod looking for an excuse to ban.

You know how I got some of my infractions? I see threads which are clear cut insulting specific forum users such as cybercom8 or longshooter with pics of dogs wearing a lightning collar etc. I wait and wait for those thread to be closed. I click the report button and wait and wait and wait.

Finally I decide that certain mods are purposely closing a blind eye to the situation and I specifically "page" for him in the thread. 5mins later, I kenna an infraction and the thread is closed. This happen repeatedly. You wanna to tell me that this is a coincidence?

I say it loud out here because I don't give a **** about being banned. I just want to voice out what is obvious. If I am going to get banned because mod not happy with me, it will happen anyway. Even using the word stupid without specifically naming or targeting anyone is an offense in my case. Any remotely 50-50 situation will go against me anyway as you can see from this thread. :D
 
Last edited:
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ Forums. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts. Please refer to our Community Guidelines and Standards and Terms and Conditions for more information.
Top