Mothership - Loh Pei Ying admits to lying about redaction of chat messages given to COP: Day 4 of Pritam’s trial

orwell76

Greater Supremacy Member
Joined
May 18, 2006
Messages
82,830
Reaction score
8,026
Redacting sounds very CIA wor

Do things that cannot see daylight
 

sukukia

Master Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2014
Messages
2,555
Reaction score
672
her karma for helping to expose ps lies is kena left, right, centre from edmw and oppo ibs…
 

lockks

Supremacy Member
Joined
Nov 1, 2008
Messages
6,508
Reaction score
220
Indeed, the case was initiated by TCJ, who has infidelity issue, based on a convicted liar's statements. The court has no choice but to go through the nonsense. A total waste of money, time and resources! Hopefully, it doesn't touch tax payers' money!

Tcj also hide his affairs from the public many many years. Not trustworthy. They still pursue this lead. What a waste of public resources.
 

orhneeorh

Banned
Joined
Jul 10, 2020
Messages
26,368
Reaction score
9,596
why the law trained PAP MP a member of the COP panel herself didn't excuse herself from giving input on the redactions
 

fanflo_08

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Mar 31, 2005
Messages
21,733
Reaction score
1,542
The COP, this trial are all smokescreens to distract people from making a fuss to the more important news. All along we have known why and their purpose.

CPF life premiums are increasing 30%.
The MRT disaster and its aftermath.
The stupidity that NTUC leaders dont even know.

SGeans are indeed daft.
 

pwongkk

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Jun 30, 2006
Messages
27,538
Reaction score
13,505
if rehayu doesn't get called up to clarify why she allowed redaction of portions that can exonerate PS, then the entire integrity of the COP is jeopardy.

whole thing is just a farce now..
Time for her to go under COP.
 

fulaien

Supremacy Member
Joined
Aug 18, 2008
Messages
9,316
Reaction score
4,851
Why is RM, a member of COP allowed to go through the messages for 3hrs with LPY?

We all know its a political exercise to target PS but this takes "fixing the opposition" to a new low
 

MyWill

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2016
Messages
27,959
Reaction score
7,736
You asked why was the message allowed to be redacted?

The answers , possible , are obvious

The 2 doing the job aren't that good at it
The 2 missed the significance
The 2 are too trusting of Loh


If you accept the 2 are the gatekeepers to prevent wrongful redaction then any failure to prevent wrongful redaction is because of them and hence they are answerable for it
And only the 2

It could even be the 2 were tired or sick but it's the 2 still responsible

So why ask why was message redacted when it's the 2 always?
I see. Not malicious. Done in good faith. We should give them credit for effort, even though job is messed up. Right? Ok. Move on.
 
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts.

Please refer to our Community Guidelines and Standards, Terms of Service and Member T&Cs for more information.
Top