Fact 1: I ask a simple question. Does Noor Deros consider foreign interference. Im expecting an answer from you that he is not. And with that common ground , we can move forward. Unfortunately , your answer is Sham bring up so KT merely responded. LOL
Fact 2: Im pretty confused by your reply. Surely you didnt read the article i posted on this and you only listen to PS comments.
From the above simple facts , You are not open enough so it think it is very hard to find a common ground with you if you keep aiming at PAP for your problems.
1.) You changed the entire premises of argument from our original debate to Noor Deros not considered foreign Interference?
No worries, since you asked this question just only earlier (Not in our original exchange).
I am more than willing to answer "No" since Deros is technically a Singaporean based in Malaysia.
2.) I am confused at your confusion.
Pretty sure very early I was the one to break down Sham's entire addeess into a.) Inviting Racial/Religious elements into Politics and b.) Aspect of Foreign Interference.
In my opinion, CS can technically be considered Foreign Interference (Some don't but some do).
Not sure on how interpret it as "Aiming PAP" when all I did was to break down into a.) and b.)
(Avoiding the use of 1.) And 2.) twice),
To further reinforce my point on KT debating with Sham on b.) above, which I pointed out earlier.
I am also finding it hard to find common ground with you, likewise. You are more than welcome to challenge my argument.
