Music Selections

Joe Mahmood

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2019
Messages
22,234
Reaction score
8,045
Thanks for your support, watching and listening.

Goodnight and good morning wherever you are...

Joe


BLACKRAIN - HELLFIRE

 
Last edited:

Joe Mahmood

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2019
Messages
22,234
Reaction score
8,045
NINEONEONE/TONY LEE STAFFORD JR/MICHAEL DENNIS SMITH - I'M A BAD MAN

 
Last edited:

Joe Mahmood

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2019
Messages
22,234
Reaction score
8,045
BRAINSTORM - RAVENOUS MINDS




NEW MODELS OF THE BRAIN

Historically, with each new scientific discovery, a new model of the brain has emerged. One of the earliest models of the brain was the "homunculus," a little man who lived inside the brain and made all the decisions. This picture was not very helpful, since it did not explain what was happening in the brain of the homunculus. Perhaps there was a homunculus hiding inside the homunculus.

With the arrival of simple mechanical devices, another model of the brain was proposed: that of a machine, such as a clock, with mechanical wheels and gears. This analogy was useful for scientists and inventors like Leonardo da Vinci, who actually designed a mechanical man.

During the late 1800s, when a steam power was carving out new empires, another analogy emerged, that of a steam engine, with flows of energy competing with one another. This hydraulic model, historians have conjectured, affected Sigmund Freud's picture of the brain, in which there was continual struggle between three forces: the ego (representing the self and rational thought) the id (representing repressed desires), and the superego (representing our conscience). In this model, it too much pressure built up because of conflict among these three, there could be a regression or general breakdown of the entire system. This model was ingenious, but as even Freud himself admitted, it required detailed studies of the brain at the neuronal level, which would take another century.

Early in the last century, with the rise of the telephone, another analogy surfaced - that of a giant switchboard. The brain was a mesh of telephone lines connected into a vast network. Consciousness was a long row of telephone operators sitting in front of a large panel of switches, constantly plugging and unplugging wires. Unfortunately, this model said nothing about how these messages were wired together to form the brain.

With the rise of the transistor, yet another model became fashionable: the computer. The old-fashioned switching stations were replaced by microchips containing hundreds of millions of transistors. Perhaps the "mind" was just a software program running on "wetware" (i.e., brain tissue rather than transistors). This model is an enduring one, even today, but it has limitations. The transistors model cannot explain how the brain performs computations that would require a computer the size of New York City. Plus the brain has no programming, no Windows operating system r Pentium chip. (Also, a PC with Pentium chip is extremely fast, but it has a bottleneck. All calculations must pass through this single processor. The brain is the opposite. The firing of each neuron is relatively slow, but it more than makes up for this by having 100 billion neurons processing data simultaneously. Therefore a slow parallel processor can trump a very fast single processor.)

The most recent analogy is that of the Internet, which lashes together billions of computers. Consciousness, in this picture, is an "emergent" phenomenon, miraculously arising out of the collective action of billions of neurons. (The problem with this picture is that it says absolutely nothing about how this miracle occurs. It brushes all the complexity of the brain under the rug of chaos theory.)

No doubt each of these analogies has kernels of Truth, but none of them truly captures the complexity of the brain.

Excerpts from the book of THE FUTURE OF THE MIND - The Scientific quest to understand, Enhance, and Empower the Mind by Michio Kaku.

https://mkaku.org/
 
Last edited:

Joe Mahmood

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2019
Messages
22,234
Reaction score
8,045
OF MICE & MEN - IDENTITY DISORDER




THE SPLIT-BRAIN PARADOX

One way in which this picture, based on the corporate hierarchy of a company, deviates from the actual structure of the brain can be seen in the curious case of split-brain patients. One unusual feature of the brain is that it has two nearly identical halves, or hemispheres, the left and right. Scientists have long wondered why the brain has this unnecessary redundancy, since the brain can operate even if one entire hemisphere is completely removed. No normal corporate hierarchy has this strange feature. Furthermore, if each hemisphere has consciousness, does this mean that we have two separate centers of consciousness inside our skull?

Dr. Roger W. Sperry of the California Institute of Technology won the Nobel Prize in 1981 for showing that the two hemispheres of the brain are not exact carbon copies of each other, but actually perform different duties. This result created a sensation in neurology (and also spawned a cottage industry of dubious self-help books that claim to apply the left-brain, right-brain dichotomy to your life).

Dr. Sperry was treating epileptics, who sometimes suffer from grand mal seizures often caused by feedback loops between the two hemispheres that go out of control. Like a microphone screeching in our ears because of a feedback loop, these seizures can become life-threatening. Dr. Sperry began by severing the corpus callosum, which connects the two hemispheres of the brain, so that they o longer communicated and shared information between the left and right side of the body. This usually stopped the feedback loop and the seizures.

At first, these split-brain patients seemed perfectly normal. They were alert and could carry on a natural conversation as if nothing had happened. But a careful analysis of these individuals showed that something was very different about them.

Normally the hemispheres complement each other as thoughts move back and forth between the two. The left brain is more analytical and logical. It is where verbal skills are found, while the right brain is more holistic and artistic. But the left brain is the dominant one and makes the final decisions. Commands pass from the left brain to the right brain via the corpus callosum. But if that connection is cut, it means that the right brain is now free from the dictatorship of the left brain. Perhaps the right brain can have a will of its own, contradicting the wishes of the dominant left brain.

In short, there could be two wills acting within one skull, sometimes struggling for control of the body. This creates the bizarre situation where the left hand (controlled by the right brain) starts to behave independently of your wishes, as if it were an alien appendage.

There is one documented case in which a man was about to hug his wife with one hand, only to find that the other hand had an entirely different agenda. It delivered a right hook to her face. Another woman reported that she would pick out a dress with one hand, only to see her other hand grab an entirely different outfit. Meanwhile, one man had difficulty sleeping at night thinking that his other rebellious hand might struggle him.

At times, split-brain people think they are living in a cartoon, where one hand struggles to control the other. Physicians sometimes call this the Dr. Strangelove syndrome, because of a scene in the movie in which one hand has to fight against the other hand.

Dr. Sperry, after detailed studies of split-brain patients, finally concluded that there could be two distinct minds operating in a single brain. He wrote that each hemisphere is "indeed a conscious system in its own right, perceiving, thinking, remembering, reasoning, willing, and emoting, all at a characteristically human level, and ... both the left and right hemisphere may be conscious simultaneously in different, even in mutually conflicting, mental experiences that run along in parallel."

When I interviewed Dr. Michael Gazzaniga of the University of California, Santa Barbara, an authority on split-brain patients, I asked him how experiment can be done to test this theory. There are a variety of ways to communicate separately to each hemisphere without the knowledge of the other hemisphere. One can, for example, have the subject wear special glasses on which questions can be shown to each eye separately, so that directing questions to each hemisphere is easy. The hard part is trying to get an answer from each hemisphere. Since the right brain cannot speak (the speech centers are located only in the left brain), it is difficult to get answers from the right brain. Dr. Gazzaniga told me that to find out what the right brain was thinking, he created an experiment in which the (mute) right brain could "talk" by using Scrabble letters.

He began by asking the patient's left brain what he would do after graduation. The patient replied that he wanted to become a draftsman. But things got interesting when the (mute) right brain was asked the same question. The right brain spelled out the words: "automobile racer." Unknown to the dominant left brain, the right brain secretly had a completely different agenda for the future. The right brain literally had a mind of its own.

Rita Carter writes, "The possible implications of this are mind-boggling. It suggests that we might all be carrying around in our skulls a mute prisoner with a personality, ambition, and self-awareness quite different from the day-to-day entity we believe ourselves to be."

Perhaps there is truth to the oft-heard statement that "inside him, there is someone yearning to be free." This means that the two hemispheres may even have different beliefs. For example, the neurologist V. S. Ramachandran describes one split-patient who, when asked if he was a believer or not, said he was an atheist, but his right brain declared he was a believer. Apparently, it is possible to have two opposing religious beliefs residing in the same brain. Ramachandran continues: "If that person dies, what happens? Does one hemisphere go to heaven and the other go to hell? I don't know the answer to that."

(It is conceivable, therefore, that a person with a split-brain personality might be both Republican and Democrat at the same time. If you ask him whom he will vote for, he will give you the candidate of the left brain, since the right brain cannot speak. But you can imagine the chaos in the voting booth when he has to pull the lever with one hand.)

Excerpts from the book of THE FUTURE OF THE MIND - The Scientific quest to understand, Enhance, and Empower the Mind by Michio Kaku.

https://mkaku.org/

https://www.verywellmind.com/phineas-gage-2795244
 
Last edited:

Joe Mahmood

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2019
Messages
22,234
Reaction score
8,045
ZAC BROWN & SIR ROSEVELT - IT GOES ON




VETERANS DESCRIBE ABOUT KILLING DURING WARTIME




ALABAMA MARINE TALKS ABOUT THE ACT OF KILLING DURING WAR




VETERANS AND PEACE ACTIVISTS SEEK TO FIND COMMON GROUND

 
Last edited:
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ Forums. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts. Please refer to our Community Guidelines and Standards and Terms and Conditions for more information.
Top