need help on storage hdd only...

deepblue_82

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2007
Messages
18,633
Reaction score
2,091
i am using a 160gb for purely dl and storage and one more 1 tb as a side too
isit worth it to spend x 1 2tb hdd or better to worth to go higher like 4tb to long term dl and storage.
please help
 

Koenig168

Supremacy Member
Joined
Nov 4, 2007
Messages
9,677
Reaction score
1,516
from the price per TB perspective, a 4TB HDD will make more sense

HDD prices are expected to increase so it makes sense to have a little extra space now
 

abstrax

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 29, 2001
Messages
1,441
Reaction score
131
i am using a 160gb for purely dl and storage and one more 1 tb as a side too
isit worth it to spend x 1 2tb hdd or better to worth to go higher like 4tb to long term dl and storage.
please help
Tat depends on how large the files u storing? GB of video files? or MB photo files? MB music files?
One day, the backup storage will be full. So u will nid to estimate how long b4 the day comes. If u r storing large GB of video files, I recommend 4TB or above.(Best to use NAS for further upgrade of storage)
If only music or photo files, 2TB is more than enuff - at least can last for another 3yrs.
 

Mclairs83

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2000
Messages
28,374
Reaction score
2,169
i am using a 160gb for purely dl and storage and one more 1 tb as a side too
isit worth it to spend x 1 2tb hdd or better to worth to go higher like 4tb to long term dl and storage.
please help

if u are talking about the real 160GB full 3.5" SATA HDD or even 2TB that is age more than 10yrs ago.. you better be prepared that anything that stored inside are those data that you bear to lose it permanently.

i even started to throw all my working 500GB HDD away because i find them extremely useless which serve no purpose, even if were to build a NAS, it will be a heat emitted device rather than serving 100% of my needs.
 

TanKianW

Supremacy Member
Joined
Apr 21, 2005
Messages
6,695
Reaction score
3,335
i am using a 160gb for purely dl and storage and one more 1 tb as a side too
isit worth it to spend x 1 2tb hdd or better to worth to go higher like 4tb to long term dl and storage.
please help

I will go higher for that 4TB drive.

For long-term storage without frequent writes/rewrites, I will recommend a NAS with some form of RAID setup. Single drive has no redundancy and no resiliency when it comes to data protection during disk failure.

If you're talking about peer-to-peer DL'ing, upping the (RAM) memory will reduce the writes on your disk to reduce wear and tear on the drives.​
 

jinsatkilife

Senior Member
Joined
May 4, 2019
Messages
1,894
Reaction score
1,922
I will go higher for that 4TB drive.

For long-term storage without frequent writes/rewrites, I will recommend a NAS with some form of RAID setup. Single drive has no redundancy and no resiliency when it comes to data protection during disk failure.

If you're talking about peer-to-peer DL'ing, upping the (RAM) memory will reduce the writes on your disk to reduce wear and tear on the drives.​
Everyday switch on n off hdd will reduce hdd lifespan?

Long term storage just use as and when needed. My external hdd last very long this way
 

ragnarok95

Senior Moderator
Senior Moderator
Joined
Mar 9, 2004
Messages
124,744
Reaction score
6,075
This type of storage thing only you know how much you will use. Why bother to ask? If we say yes, you will chiong out to buy a 2TB and then leave there inside the rig? You should know yourself how much storage you will need.
 

deepblue_82

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2007
Messages
18,633
Reaction score
2,091
if u are talking about the real 160GB full 3.5" SATA HDD or even 2TB that is age more than 10yrs ago.. you better be prepared that anything that stored inside are those data that you bear to lose it permanently.

i even started to throw all my working 500GB HDD away because i find them extremely useless which serve no purpose, even if were to build a NAS, it will be a heat emitted device rather than serving 100% of my needs.
ya a really working 160gb 3.5 hdd
 

deepblue_82

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2007
Messages
18,633
Reaction score
2,091
I will go higher for that 4TB drive.

For long-term storage without frequent writes/rewrites, I will recommend a NAS with some form of RAID setup. Single drive has no redundancy and no resiliency when it comes to data protection during disk failure.

If you're talking about peer-to-peer DL'ing, upping the (RAM) memory will reduce the writes on your disk to reduce wear and tear on the drives.​
coz i do alot of p2p i will dl and delete every few days.
i have 32gb ram
 

TanKianW

Supremacy Member
Joined
Apr 21, 2005
Messages
6,695
Reaction score
3,335
coz i do alot of p2p i will dl and delete every few days.
i have 32gb ram

If it works for you and the data is not mission-critical, I don't see the reason to stop using it. From my experience, the much older and lower-cap drives tend to last really long. I still had quite a few Hitachi (now HGST) drives that are still running after 12+ years in my storage rack (on ZFS), which just refuse to retire to this day. Some I just need to retire due to their limited storage capacity.

32G should be plenty for such a use case.
Everyday switch on n off hdd will reduce hdd lifespan?

Long term storage just use as and when needed. My external hdd last very long this way

Never tried that myself. I prefer to keep my drive "warm" 24/7 and "ZFS paranoia" during storage.

Portable/External HDD tends to die/silent corrupt without much warning. I will suggest that a proper 3-2-1 backup strategy is still preferred if you have the resources to do so, and the data is of paramount importance to you.

The rule of thumb is that "SMART" tests are deceiving and cannot be fully trusted. Same as you cannot just rely on the patients (storage drives) to tell you how they are feeling without the doctor testing out the symptoms. Truth is, conventional RAID (1, 2, 4, 5, 6, etc) is also not sufficiently competent to protect your data if you look deeper.​
 
Last edited:

deepblue_82

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2007
Messages
18,633
Reaction score
2,091
This type of storage thing only you know how much you will use. Why bother to ask? If we say yes, you will chiong out to buy a 2TB and then leave there inside the rig? You should know yourself how much storage you will need.

no la.. i am really asking here.... see what you guys say ma..
 

AMAT

Member
Joined
Nov 5, 2001
Messages
160
Reaction score
0
For my case, I would just buy those cheap 1tb or 2tb $10-20 from carousell. Your 160gb and 1tb will become your backup. You can just buy 2, one for copy 160gb/1tb to it and use as second backup. Cheap cheap at most $40. Get those 2.5" better, can last longer.

My old one when full always use for backup after a few years usage, from 40gb to 320gb etc.

The people are very sensitive on their storage, always use high end one. You use low end they will always tekan you.
 

deepblue_82

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2007
Messages
18,633
Reaction score
2,091
For my case, I would just buy those cheap 1tb or 2tb $10-20 from carousell. Your 160gb and 1tb will become your backup. You can just buy 2, one for copy 160gb/1tb to it and use as second backup. Cheap cheap at most $40. Get those 2.5" better, can last longer.

My old one when full always use for backup after a few years usage, from 40gb to 320gb etc.

The people are very sensitive on their storage, always use high end one. You use low end they will always tekan you.
ta i got buy the carousell ones then just thow the data inside...
 

Koenig168

Supremacy Member
Joined
Nov 4, 2007
Messages
9,677
Reaction score
1,516
If it works for you and the data is not mission-critical, I don't see the reason to stop using it. From my experience, the much older and lower-cap drives tend to last really long. I still had quite a few Hitachi (now HGST) drives that are still running after 12+ years in my storage rack (on ZFS), which just refuse to retire to this day. Some I just need to retire due to their limited storage capacity.

32G should be plenty for such a use case.



Never tried that myself. I prefer to keep my drive "warm" 24/7 and "ZFS paranoia" during storage.

Portable/External HDD tends to die/silent corrupt without much warning. I will suggest that a proper 3-2-1 backup strategy is still preferred if you have the resources to do so, and the data is of paramount importance to you.

The rule of thumb is that "SMART" tests are deceiving and cannot be fully trusted. Same as you cannot just rely on the patients (storage drives) to tell you how they are feeling without the doctor testing out the symptoms. Truth is, conventional RAID (1, 2, 4, 5, 6, etc) is also not sufficiently competent to protect your data if you look deeper.​

Most people do not have the know-how or patience to monitor HDD health. As you said, a proper 3-2-1 backup strategy is the way to go.
 
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts.

Please refer to our Community Guidelines and Standards, Terms of Service and Member T&Cs for more information.
Top