New CPF LIFE Estimator

fr33d0m

Master Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2008
Messages
3,714
Reaction score
730
The bequest portion now becomes an uncertainty.

This is perhaps to prepare the stage for another policy change.
It is never certain.

an estimate is just an estimate, can be 10% accurate or 50% accurate or 90% accurate.
 

fr33d0m

Master Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2008
Messages
3,714
Reaction score
730
The interest rates and mortality experience disclaimers were in both versions and there's no change.

The old version has 3 sets of data in chart form: payout, bequest and total payout by age.

New version has 3 payout values at age 65,85 and 95.

Is that sufficient information to make a decision? I leave it to individuals to decide. If you think you want more, please write in to CPF.
An estimate is just an estimate. You can estimate your own.

CPF’s estimate is not in any way better than your estimate or my estimate.

The bequest part of estimate is especially problematic and confusing. It is not an wonder that CPF changes the presentation of an estimate with more ambiguity as it is not close enough to actual experience.
 

fr33d0m

Master Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2008
Messages
3,714
Reaction score
730
I used to be able to see the goal post clearly enough.
Now I cannot see the goal post through the 'fog'. I need to write in now so that I can see the goal post clearly again.
You never see the goal post and it keeps changing. The glimpse CPF provides previously is not an actual experience, it is just an estimate CPF provides and it has stopped providing as it is not close to actual experience.

No official communication from CPF will be based on the estimator. It will always tell you something around “based on actual mortality experience and adjust accordingly”. It won’t give you any number.
 

zoneguard

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 2, 2000
Messages
1,957
Reaction score
398
For reference:
1. https://www.cpf.gov.sg/members/FAQ/schemes/Retirement/CPF-LIFE/FAQDetails?category=Retirement&group=CPF LIFE&folderid=11663&ajfaqid=2186377
2. https://www.cpf.gov.sg/members/aboutus/about-us-info/cpf-clarifies/policy-faqs/why-is-interest-earned-on-my-cpf-life-premium-not-included-as-part-of-the-amount-paid-to-my-beneficiaries-when-i-pass-away?category=CPF Retirement Monthly Payouts&folderid=19774&faqid=6791249
3. https://www.cpf.gov.sg/members/FAQ/schemes/Retirement/CPF-LIFE/FAQDetails?category=Retirement&group=CPF LIFE&folderid=11684&ajfaqid=2186431

ACPF LIFE is a longevity insurance scheme that provides you with a monthly payout for as long as you live. When you join CPF LIFE, your CPF LIFE premium will be paid with your CPF savings. Projected interest earned on your CPF LIFE premium is factored into your monthly payouts from the start.
Your CPF LIFE payouts will be drawn from your CPF LIFE premium first. When your CPF LIFE premium is exhausted, you will then draw your monthly payouts for as long as you live from the interest that you and other CPF LIFE members have accumulated.
The lifelong payouts under CPF LIFE for all members are made possible through this method of interest accumulation. That is why interest does not form part of the amount paid to the beneficiaries of CPF LIFE members when they pass away.

If you pass on before your CPF LIFE premium is exhausted, the CPF LIFE premium balance (if any) together with any remaining CPF savings will be distributed to your loved ones.

ACPF LIFE Basic Plan is a legacy plan carried over from the time CPF LIFE was first introduced in 2009. Many members would find the Standard or Escalating Plan more suited to their needs. Unlike the CPF LIFE Standard Plan that gives higher and stable monthly payouts, the monthly payouts under the Basic Plan are lower and will get progressively lower when your combined CPF balances eventually fall below $60,000. This is because the extra interest is earned on the first $60,000 of your combined CPF balances are credited to the Retirement Account (RA) and paid as part of your monthly payouts. As balances fall due to payouts, the extra interest earned and subsequent payouts will decline as well.
Under the LIFE Basic Plan, about 10-20% of your RA savings will be deducted as CPF LIFE premium when you join CPF LIFE, which can be any time from 65 to 70.
Your monthly payout will first be paid from your RA and is estimated to last until 90. Thereafter, monthly payouts will be paid from your CPF LIFE premium. If your CPF LIFE premium is depleted, you will continue to receive monthly payouts no matter how long you live.

AAfter you pass away, your beneficiaries will receive your CPF LIFE premium balance, which is the total CPF LIFE premium that you have paid less the total payouts you have received from your premium, together with any remaining CPF savings.
For example, if you paid a CPF LIFE premium of $200,000 and pass away after receiving a monthly payout of $1,000 for ten months, we will pay your CPF LIFE premium balance of $190,000 (i.e. $200,000 - [$1,000 x 10 months]) together with any CPF savings to your beneficiaries.
On the other hand, if you pass away before receiving any payouts, we will pay your CPF LIFE premium balance of $200,000, together with any remaining CPF savings to your beneficiaries.

To monitor if the same information can be found when the revamp to https://www.cpf.gov.sg/member is completed.
 

kickass22

Senior Member
Joined
May 27, 2014
Messages
609
Reaction score
264
You never see the goal post and it keeps changing. The glimpse CPF provides previously is not an actual experience, it is just an estimate CPF provides and it has stopped providing as it is not close to actual experience.

No official communication from CPF will be based on the estimator. It will always tell you something around “based on actual mortality experience and adjust accordingly”. It won’t give you any number.
I also remember they include another statement that says, that the figure will change but the change will be small and minimal.
 

Value.Matrix

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 13, 2019
Messages
628
Reaction score
58
An estimate is just an estimate. You can estimate your own.

CPF’s estimate is not in any way better than your estimate or my estimate.

The bequest part of estimate is especially problematic and confusing. It is not an wonder that CPF changes the presentation of an estimate with more ambiguity as it is not close enough to actual experience.
The issues is based on the payouts, the estimate is quite fair and accurate. If payouts are increased, basic plan will suffer more, as the RA will be depleted at a faster rate.

But that also means the 4% interest will still be paid out as long as "10% to 20% of the RA are paid to CPF Life as premiums" remain, we can do an estimate and the old graphs are ok.

If they remove that line, it changes.things fundamentally. That is the worry. There is no way to cross check.

Whether our truth is the truth, it can be calculated at least to verify. Now is, you talk, i can change rule anytime since i did nkt orovide anything to verify.
 

zoneguard

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 2, 2000
Messages
1,957
Reaction score
398
The issues is based on the payouts, the estimate is quite fair and accurate. If payouts are increased, basic plan will suffer more, as the RA will be depleted at a faster rate.

But that also means the 4% interest will still be paid out as long as "10% to 20% of the RA are paid to CPF Life as premiums" remain, we can do an estimate and the old graphs are ok.

If they remove that line, it changes.things fundamentally. That is the worry. There is no way to cross check.

Whether our truth is the truth, it can be calculated at least to verify. Now is, you talk, i can change rule anytime since i did nkt orovide anything to verify.

I looked for other sites with screen shots of the old estimators:
1. https://dollarsandsense.sg/standard-basic-plan-need-understand-cpf-life-plans-deciding/
2. https://dollarsandsense.sg/cpf-life-basic-plan-wish-old-cpf-retirement-sum-scheme-rss/
3. https://endowus.com/insights/cpf-life-for-retirement/
4. https://onestopfinancial.sg/cpf-scheme/cpf-life/
5. https://valuewarrior.blogspot.com/2021/01/retirement-sum-scheme-rss-vs-cpf-life.html

Also archived the CPF links locally and remotely. Let's wait for the reply for the write-in.
 

BBCWatcher

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2010
Messages
24,612
Reaction score
5,598
It does seem fair to look at monthly payout trajectories as the primary consideration. The old calculator didn’t do that, but the new one does. Once payouts start residuals inexorably fall every month and fall to zero eventually. How soon they fall to zero varies, but they all get there if the member merely lives long enough. I could see why some potential heirs would want a slower declining residual, but it’s really not the CPF Board’s job to cater to anyone except the member her/himself — not its primary mission anyway. The member can decide whether the member wants declining real purchasing power out of CPF LIFE to chase the possibility (but not assurance) of a somewhat larger residual.

Do we really want to argue that chasing a declining residual is equally important as the monthly payout trajectories among the general membership with a typically near (or below) poverty level retirement income stream? I’d vote no, but if you’re among the minority of members who would like to weight the residual trajectories more heavily, you still can.

Pure speculation here, but it could be that the recent “pop” in short-term inflation rates reminded everyone that inflation still matters. That plate of chicken rice isn’t going to cost S$3 forever. (Oops, sorry, it’s S$3.50 now and smaller.) So how are elderly Singaporeans going to cope with 2 to 4 decades of inflation? Many are already struggling, so how about just asking them “what’s the plan?”, as this estimator does? Seems fair. Their children are already often going to inherit the residual HDB leasehold, so they can calm down.
 

zoneguard

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 2, 2000
Messages
1,957
Reaction score
398
The old calculator didn’t do that, but the new one does.

Actually the old calculator had monthly payout data. I kept the raw JSON data for all 3 plans and the conversions to CSV for my scenario planning. I even shared how to do this conversion somewhere in one of the threads here.

The new one only has 3 payout data points at 3 ages. And we are being asked to decide our plan choice based on this.
 

BBCWatcher

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2010
Messages
24,612
Reaction score
5,598
Simplification can be a very good thing. Do most members really need to see 30+ years of a horizontal estimated nominal payout line (Standard Plan), for example?
 

BBCWatcher

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2010
Messages
24,612
Reaction score
5,598
We're not being sold an annuity. We're required to pick one of three available life annuity payout plans. In principle, if the information to inform this decision can be simplified and still be at least as helpful for the bulk of participants, great!

Private insurers' benefit illustrations are not any sort of gold standard here. It's not even clear they're bronze standards.
 

proton_cannon

Supremacy Member
Joined
Feb 2, 2020
Messages
5,260
Reaction score
2,455
Actually the old calculator had monthly payout data. I kept the raw JSON data for all 3 plans and the conversions to CSV for my scenario planning. I even shared how to do this conversion somewhere in one of the threads here.

The new one only has 3 payout data points at 3 ages. And we are being asked to decide our plan choice based on this.
obviously, CPF board is trying to hide information from the public they are supposed to serve
 

andyhtc

Suspended
Joined
Aug 7, 2016
Messages
20,855
Reaction score
11,037
There are quite a lot of people who want to bequest as much as possible since they don't really need the CPF payout. Having the bequest information can provide a reference for estate planning.
 

iceblendedchoc

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Nov 22, 2016
Messages
23,272
Reaction score
10,030
We're not being sold an annuity. We're required to pick one of three available life annuity payout plans. In principle, if the information to inform this decision can be simplified and still be at least as helpful for the bulk of participants, great!

Private insurers' benefit illustrations are not any sort of gold standard here. It's not even clear they're bronze standards.
to be fair, we are not sold an annuity, we are forced into it.

So a better disclosure should be expected. I do think we need some certainly when it come to retirement money which a government draw without reservation from our monthly paycheck.
 
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ Forums. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts. Please refer to our Community Guidelines and Standards and Terms and Conditions for more information.
Top