News| Woman with 5 properties wanted elderly dad's 4 homes

Philipkee

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Jun 8, 2013
Messages
26,262
Reaction score
15,483
At 90 so much money still bring over to the other side?
The 90-year-old businessman, who is illiterate, got caught up in this dispute only because he wanted to use the proceeds from the sale of four investment properties to buy a home for a grandson.

Wonder what home he wanted to buy when it need the proceeds of four properties to buy. But doesn’t look like he trying to hoard cash
 

Jude Raphael

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 28, 2024
Messages
950
Reaction score
623
See lah. Have daughter is as good as don't have

:D
I guess only her parent would know. The Judge has avoided commenting on this aspect too. It would be unfair for outsiders to comment and make a general statement based on this case alone..清官难判家务事。。Sometimes, we have to consider that the above statement applies to our own mothers, wives, siblings and children.

"Justice Choo said: "The defendant describes herself as a filial daughter. It is a description open to debate, depending on whether one thinks that a filial child would surrender to the parents what her parents want, regardless of whether the child thinks it fair or deserving.""
 

Tsoukalos

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Apr 3, 2016
Messages
24,470
Reaction score
3,912
A real estate tycoon who liked to buy property for his children became entangled in a bitter lawsuit when one of his daughters ironically claimed that she was a co-owner of his own investment properties.

The 90-year-old businessman, who is illiterate, got caught up in this dispute only because he wanted to use the proceeds from the sale of four investment properties to buy a home for a grandson.

It was then that he discovered that he was not the sole owner of these properties.

His youngest daughter, who helped him with the paperwork for the purchase of the homes for around $11 million in all between 2004 and 2018, had also inserted her name as a co-owner. This was on top of the five homes she already owned in her own name.

To make matters worse, the daughter objected to the sale, claiming that all four homes, which are likely to be worth a lot more today, were hers as they were gifts from her father.

The elderly man was so upset that he sued his daughter to reclaim the properties.

He related his case in the Hokkien dialect and struck High Court Judge Choo Han Teck as a credible witness who testified without embellishment or deception.

Justice Choo not only found that the man had bought the four properties for himself as investments, but he also believed his claim that his daughter had taken advantage of his inability to read by putting her name on the title deeds.

The daughter argued that her name was included as a co-owner because her father had intended to give her these properties. But this claim did not gel with her father's practice of buying properties for each of his six children in their own names.

Indeed, this daughter had five properties purchased in her name by her father, of which three have since been sold.

"That exposes the flaw in (her) contention that the (father) gave the four properties to her as joint tenant," Justice Choo added.

"Were that his intention, he would have given them to her in her sole name, just as he did with those five properties and all the ones he gave to his other children."

So he ruled that the four disputed properties were solely owned by the father and that his daughter was merely holding them for him. He also gave the order to sell the four properties according to the father's wishes.

Justice Choo said: "The defendant describes herself as a filial daughter. It is a description open to debate, depending on whether one thinks that a filial child would surrender to the parents what her parents want, regardless of whether the child thinks it fair or deserving."

But this was a "philosophical issue", and the father did not need extrajudicial considerations to bolster his case because he managed to prove his claim adequately.

The evidence suggested that the family was a "close-knit" one until the father chose to make more gifts by selling his own properties. "Even the tapestry of close-knit families can be unravelled by greed," Justice Choo noted.

Continue reading: https://www.tnp.sg/news/woman-5-properties-wanted-elderly-dads-4-homes
真的是一块又大又肥的叉烧
 

psyger-zero

Supremacy Member
Joined
Nov 15, 2024
Messages
6,296
Reaction score
5,148
A real estate tycoon who liked to buy property for his children became entangled in a bitter lawsuit when one of his daughters ironically claimed that she was a co-owner of his own investment properties.

The 90-year-old businessman, who is illiterate, got caught up in this dispute only because he wanted to use the proceeds from the sale of four investment properties to buy a home for a grandson.

It was then that he discovered that he was not the sole owner of these properties.

His youngest daughter, who helped him with the paperwork for the purchase of the homes for around $11 million in all between 2004 and 2018, had also inserted her name as a co-owner. This was on top of the five homes she already owned in her own name.

To make matters worse, the daughter objected to the sale, claiming that all four homes, which are likely to be worth a lot more today, were hers as they were gifts from her father.

The elderly man was so upset that he sued his daughter to reclaim the properties.

He related his case in the Hokkien dialect and struck High Court Judge Choo Han Teck as a credible witness who testified without embellishment or deception.

Justice Choo not only found that the man had bought the four properties for himself as investments, but he also believed his claim that his daughter had taken advantage of his inability to read by putting her name on the title deeds.

The daughter argued that her name was included as a co-owner because her father had intended to give her these properties. But this claim did not gel with her father's practice of buying properties for each of his six children in their own names.

Indeed, this daughter had five properties purchased in her name by her father, of which three have since been sold.

"That exposes the flaw in (her) contention that the (father) gave the four properties to her as joint tenant," Justice Choo added.

"Were that his intention, he would have given them to her in her sole name, just as he did with those five properties and all the ones he gave to his other children."

So he ruled that the four disputed properties were solely owned by the father and that his daughter was merely holding them for him. He also gave the order to sell the four properties according to the father's wishes.

Justice Choo said: "The defendant describes herself as a filial daughter. It is a description open to debate, depending on whether one thinks that a filial child would surrender to the parents what her parents want, regardless of whether the child thinks it fair or deserving."

But this was a "philosophical issue", and the father did not need extrajudicial considerations to bolster his case because he managed to prove his claim adequately.

The evidence suggested that the family was a "close-knit" one until the father chose to make more gifts by selling his own properties. "Even the tapestry of close-knit families can be unravelled by greed," Justice Choo noted.

Continue reading: https://www.tnp.sg/news/woman-5-properties-wanted-elderly-dads-4-homes
Char siews,char siews everywhere.
 

iCubes

Master Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2005
Messages
4,556
Reaction score
1,156
Glad that justice was served! Many times people get away with it and its nice to see people getting caught for their bullsheet.
 

jywy2005

Supremacy Member
Joined
Mar 22, 2013
Messages
5,265
Reaction score
2,462
So the daughter had five properties purchased in her name by her father? Really so good.. Then still want to lay hands on another four.
 

bonkeng

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2009
Messages
1,855
Reaction score
187
I bet the dad now wished he didnt bring this greedy shitty daughter into this world.
 

Apparatus

Great Supremacy Member
Joined
May 27, 2005
Messages
53,463
Reaction score
11,205
I guess only her parent would know. The Judge has avoided commenting on this aspect too. It would be unfair for outsiders to comment and make a general statement based on this case alone..清官难判家务事。。Sometimes, we have to consider that the above statement applies to our own mothers, wives, siblings and children.

"Justice Choo said: "The defendant describes herself as a filial daughter. It is a description open to debate, depending on whether one thinks that a filial child would surrender to the parents what her parents want, regardless of whether the child thinks it fair or deserving.""

It all boils down to proper upbringing by the old man. Also, the daughter already has 5 properties still want the 4 homes of the old man. Sibeh greedy
 
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts.

Please refer to our Community Guidelines and Standards, Terms of Service and Member T&Cs for more information.
Top