[Official] Nanoblock Thread

StealthEagle

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 21, 2003
Messages
2,241
Reaction score
0
Anyway, as promised. Here are the instructions to the ver1 Disneyland castle.
There were only 3 main colours, White, Grey and Blue. (With a little yellow on top) So it was easy to guess the words.

DisneyCastleVer1_zps11f88db5.jpg.html


449_10151660983280535_1881531083_n.jpg


edit: p.s. no idea why the pic of the instructions isn't appearing properly. But you can open it in a new tab and it should appear fine.

To be specific, light grey, lemon yellow (bright yellow), cyan and white (not sure it is pure white or has slight creamy hue white).

The parts can be found in the Basic kit.

Anyway, you sure you want to post the picture here? You could be infringing copyright rules and attracting the copycat companies like what that company did to chris' works.
 

StealthEagle

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 21, 2003
Messages
2,241
Reaction score
0
Speaking of the windmill, is it a standard item for most retail stores? Maybe the GSS can grant us some discounts.
 

justmeasures

Master Member
Joined
Jul 20, 2011
Messages
2,999
Reaction score
0
To be specific, light grey, lemon yellow (bright yellow), cyan and white (not sure it is pure white or has slight creamy hue white).

The parts can be found in the Basic kit.

Anyway, you sure you want to post the picture here? You could be infringing copyright rules and attracting the copycat companies like what that company did to chris' works.

Well. The kit is retired. They aren't reproducing it. I dont see a major problem. :)

Which is why its my policy to no longer share instructions of existing kits.
 

Xrisis

Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2008
Messages
474
Reaction score
3
To be specific, light grey, lemon yellow (bright yellow), cyan and white (not sure it is pure white or has slight creamy hue white).

The parts can be found in the Basic kit.

Anyway, you sure you want to post the picture here? You could be infringing copyright rules and attracting the copycat companies like what that company did to chris' works.

@@ it is actually a copyright infringement?
 

StealthEagle

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 21, 2003
Messages
2,241
Reaction score
0
@@ it is actually a copyright infringement?

If one of the restrictions involves with sharing publicity is a no-no in Kawada's books, then yes. Given that situation, the owner has to ask the upload to remove it.

It is quite a grey area so it is hard to pinpoint what is wrong or right. I have seen an app containing many out-of-productions Lego instructions and nothing was done.

Don't forget about copycat companies are hungry for freebies and crediting them as their creations.
 

Xrisis

Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2008
Messages
474
Reaction score
3
If one of the restrictions involves with sharing publicity is a no-no in Kawada's books, then yes. Given that situation, the owner has to ask the upload to remove it.

It is quite a grey area so it is hard to pinpoint what is wrong or right. I have seen an app containing many out-of-productions Lego instructions and nothing was done.

Don't forget about copycat companies are hungry for freebies and crediting them as their creations.

I don't think Lego has such infringement because it's very common to pick bricks and build.. But maybe it's too usual that Lego doesn't care also.

From Lego pov, we kinda really heck care about "copycat" companies because real collectors will always go back to the actual brand. Always got quality different.

I saw the products of Chris' creation in HK, it's not cheap actually haha. But imo Chris case is quite special since he wasn't even selling the products.

Shrugs, maybe I just have different opinion against these copycats because having more actually means there are people interested. :) But collectors will always go back to the actual brand. With more people playing with blocks, whether nanoblock or not, it means community is getting bigger.
 

StealthEagle

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 21, 2003
Messages
2,241
Reaction score
0
I don't think Lego has such infringement because it's very common to pick bricks and build.. But maybe it's too usual that Lego doesn't care also.

From Lego pov, we kinda really heck care about "copycat" companies because real collectors will always go back to the actual brand. Always got quality different.

I saw the products of Chris' creation in HK, it's not cheap actually haha. But imo Chris case is quite special since he wasn't even selling the products.

Shrugs, maybe I just have different opinion against these copycats because having more actually means there are people interested. :) But collectors will always go back to the actual brand. With more people playing with blocks, whether nanoblock or not, it means community is getting bigger.

Even Chris wants to sue the company for selling his works without consent, it would be hard because laws differ in China.

Copycat companies become a problem when everything becomes identical to the original (they did that to Lego), which means it is time to educate the collectors on identify what's real and what's not.
 

Xrisis

Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2008
Messages
474
Reaction score
3
Even Chris wants to sue the company for selling his works without consent, it would be hard because laws differ in China.

Copycat companies become a problem when everything becomes identical to the original (they did that to Lego), which means it is time to educate the collectors on identify what's real and what's not.

Lego is easy la.. There's always the lego sign. Actually nanoblocks are difficult.. Because there's so many out there.

I bought some Taiwan brand which are actually cute (vespa!!), and not bad quality.

There's another brand Utico which use a nanoblock similar bricks to build Remote Cars.

But these are not copycat la unlike the china one.. Just a wider collection of bricks creations.

Till the end.. Nanoblock still has its collectors market. Copycats are always copycats la.. Never ahead of the real ones! It just becomes an issue with non-collectors where they buy regardless of brand lo.

If they actually have the heart to release similar items, whether or not the community choose to share.. They'll always find ways to kope the design one.

Though frankly I'm slightly happy to see fakes, not because I support it la, but because it really means it's getting popular enough for fakes to be in the market.
 
Last edited:

justmeasures

Master Member
Joined
Jul 20, 2011
Messages
2,999
Reaction score
0
I don't think Lego has such infringement because it's very common to pick bricks and build.. But maybe it's too usual that Lego doesn't care also.

From Lego pov, we kinda really heck care about "copycat" companies because real collectors will always go back to the actual brand. Always got quality different.

I saw the products of Chris' creation in HK, it's not cheap actually haha. But imo Chris case is quite special since he wasn't even selling the products.

Shrugs, maybe I just have different opinion against these copycats because having more actually means there are people interested. :) But collectors will always go back to the actual brand. With more people playing with blocks, whether nanoblock or not, it means community is getting bigger.

It is a copyright infringement. However, not all copyright infringements are enforceable (as mentioned due to territorial/country laws etc). Many things these days definitely break and infringe on copyright laws. I.e. Running Man with English Subs. The official producers (SBS?) don't pursue these 'infringers' for obvious reasons. It's a grey area la...


Trademarks are a different story.
 

lilrex21

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 19, 2011
Messages
1,285
Reaction score
0
speaking of knockoffs.. i don't remember if i ever shared this. 1 - 2 years back i went to cameron highlands. at a row of shops there, i found nanoblock knock offs, but supersized!! hahaha..

imagine nanoblock giraffe but upsized using bricks about the size of normal lego.. :D

the build quality was terrible of course, i had to use superglue to glue the legs so that the giraffe could stand. the bricks didnt have the high gloss finishing and smelled kinda weird to me.

but it was cheap, i think about RM5 only. so i bought it for fun.. :D
 

Xeon_sg

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2002
Messages
19,303
Reaction score
7
Hokkaido should have provided you visit the major malls. Look out for:
Yodobashi, Bic Camera, Tokyu Hands and Loft.

Was in Kyoto/Osaka recently.. Yodobashi & Bic Camera have more variety esp the former. Tokyo Hands have also, but the stocks not appealing.
 

sky00sky

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Oct 16, 2007
Messages
34,361
Reaction score
2,244
Was At terminal 2 before leaving for prc just now the times there have nano

:)
 
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ Forums. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts. Please refer to our Community Guidelines and Standards and Terms and Conditions for more information.
Top