Holding excessive shares to the tune of more than 200k prior to this black swan event would likely mean that the individual have more than 30% of his holdings wiped out. But the same can’t be said for a property as yet.
Don’t see those holding property having 30% of value wiped out unless the quantum is high.
In short, property is likely more resilient in this situation. Of cos, holding cash is best if u are really risk averse.
I do hold a lot inside equities (yes >200k), but didn't really see 30% wipe out. Actually less. In fact, certain shares actually rose quite a bit, to the tune of 20% more actually. Of course, I won't deny that some shares dropped a fair bit. But 30% is a bit extreme I would say, unless one holds only the STI ETF.
Whereas properties. Yes, value may hold constant.
Try selling them now at that constant price. While still possible, the difficulty increases significantly.
Apart from that, properties tend to lag the economy by 6 months (whereas stocks tend to lead by 6 months). SG is more or less confirmed to have a recession this year.
That is probably a reason for the belief in the "resilience".