Ong Ye Kung, Chee Hong Tat have no dealings with Fujian gang member Su Haijin, say press secretaries

[prudie]

Quoted"
Local businessman Sam Goi, also known as Singapore's "Popiah King", told Bloomberg on Tuesday that he had organised and paid for the meals the ministers and Mr Ng attended.

"It's all for friends and I paid for them all," the owner and executive chairman of Tee Yih Jia Food Manufacturing reportedly said.

Mr Goi said the meals took place "around 2020" before Singapore implemented COVID-19 restrictions.

He added that he has not kept in touch with Su, who had been a director at Singapore-listed restaurant company No Signboard Holdings.

According to the Bloomberg report, Goi also had a minority stake in the company, which is now called Bromat Holdings.

"It all happened a long time ago," Mr Goi told Bloomberg, referring to the gatherings. "Let it drop."
"
https://www.channelnewsasia.com/sin...hong-tat-fujian-gang-member-su-haijin-5110851

Mr Goi paid for it.

So influential. Say drop means must drop.

 

[spunkbrat]

What about the other 2 occasions? Cos the table & chairs are different from this ncm one.

Dunno, this was from tmkedmw’s link

 

[Nuclear Boy]

Singapore President has no say in such matters?

CPIB can go to him if PM declines their investigation.

 

[gaul_ads]

Later iron fist by their 主公 and send them to 新疆 耕田

 

[CanIsayNo]

u all realise that mainstream media these days getting bolder? no give chance to them. or maybe...

 

[ShinnAsuka]

Ok what, bloomberg reported sam goi in china

 

[gaul_ads]

王毅 can accept Omikyron and Chee Hong dine together with Su ?

Later send them to Xinjiang

 

[gaul_ads]

Ok what, bloomberg reported sam goi in china

Sam not minister what.. and photo just sexpose today

 

[crunsik]

Honest mistake pls move on

 

[BMWguy]

u all realise that mainstream media these days getting bolder? no give chance to them. or maybe...

hahahaha.. u think mainstream media dare to do such things without permission from the one that holds the most power?

 

[moonlighter_sg]

They better stay away from Hong Kong also, our military vehicles were confiscated in HK.

 

[buttbERry]

dangerous thread leh

insinuation simi?

 

[Okeirkkire]

Ok what, bloomberg reported sam goi in china

As protection?

 

[gaul_ads]

As protection?

Maybe enroute to 耕田

 

[CanIsayNo]

hahahaha.. u think mainstream media dare to do such things without permission from the one that holds the most power?

or could it be.. the one holding the most power is not as powerful as the predecessors? or is the power held elsewhere?

 

[hardindex]

already say hard to find riao

why does money launderer always want connection to transport ministers?



Money launderers often seek connections to transport ministers or officials in the transportation sector because the industry provides several advantages for disguising illicit funds. Here’s why:

1. High-Value, Cash-Intensive Businesses​

The transport sector (shipping, logistics, trucking, aviation) involves large transactions, making it easier to blend illegal money with legitimate revenue. For example:

• Fake invoices for fuel, maintenance, or freight services can be used to justify illicit cash.
• Over- or under-reporting shipments to move money across borders.

2. Cross-Border Movement of Goods & Money​

Transport networks facilitate international trade, allowing money launderers to:

• Smuggle cash or valuables (e.g., gold, luxury cars) disguised as cargo.
• Use trade-based laundering (e.g., over-invoicing imports/under-invoicing exports).
• Exploit customs loopholes with help from corrupt officials.

3. Government Contracts & Subsidies​

Transport ministers oversee large public infrastructure projects (roads, ports, railways), which can be exploited for:

• Kickbacks & inflated contracts – Launderers bribe officials to win deals and funnel dirty money.
• Shell companies – Fake subcontractors are paid with illicit funds.

4. Ease of Concealing Ownership​

Many transport businesses (shipping companies, trucking firms) can be owned through offshore entities or straw men, making it hard to trace real beneficiaries.

5. Regulatory Loopholes & Weak Oversight​

Some transport sectors (maritime shipping, private aviation) have lighter financial scrutiny, allowing:

• Ghost shipments (recording fake cargo movements to justify money flows).
• Misuse of logistics hubs (free trade zones where oversight is lax).

Real-World Examples​

• "Panama Papers" revealed how shell companies linked to transport were used for laundering.
• Port & customs corruption in some countries allows smuggling of cash/goods.
• Airline money laundering – Some criminals buy or invest in airlines to move money globally.

Conclusion​

A connection to a transport minister gives launderers influence over policies, contracts, and inspections, making it easier to move and legitimize dirty money. This makes the sector a prime target for financial crime networks.
Would you like examples of specific cases where this happened?

 

[hardindex]

There are several real-world cases where money launderers or corrupt networks exploited connections to transport ministers, officials, or the transportation sector to move illicit funds. Here are some notable examples:

---

1. Malaysia – 1MDB Scandal (Jho Low & Transport Minister-linked Fraud)​

• Key Figure: Low Taek Jho (Jho Low), a fugitive financier.
• Transport Link: Funds from the 1MDB sovereign wealth fund were laundered through private jets, yacht purchases, and luxury car shipments.
• How?
  • Some funds were used to buy a Bombardier jet (registered via shell companies).
  • Transport-related businesses (maritime, aviation) helped disguise money flows.
  • Investigations revealed connections to Malaysian officials overseeing transport sectors.

---

2. Brazil – Operation Car Wash (Odebrecht & Petrobras Bribes)​

• Key Figures: Construction giant Odebrecht, politicians, and transport officials.
• Transport Link:
  • Bribes were paid to transport ministers and infrastructure officials in exchange for contracts.
  • Dirty money was moved through fake shipping invoices, port contracts, and road construction projects.
  • At least 12 countries in Latin America were involved, with transport ministers in Peru, Colombia, and Panama implicated.

---

3. Mozambique – “Tuna Bond” Scandal (Hidden Debts & Maritime Fraud)​

• Key Figures: Former Mozambique Finance Minister, Credit Suisse bankers, and shipbuilding executives.
• Transport Link:
  • $2 billion in loans were taken for maritime security and fishing projects (but funds were embezzled).
  • Some money went to bribes for transport officials overseeing ports and shipping.
  • Fake companies linked to Dubai-based shipping networks helped launder the money.

4. Angola – Isabel dos Santos & Dubai Ports Deal​

• Key Figure: Isabel dos Santos (daughter of ex-president José Eduardo dos Santos).
• Transport Link:
  • She allegedly used her influence to secure lucrative port and logistics contracts.
  • Funds were moved through shipping companies and Dubai-based trade hubs.
  • A Portuguese investigation found links between Angolan transport officials and money laundering.

---

5. Pakistan – Axact Scandal (Fake Diplomas & Money Laundering via Transport)​

• Key Figure: Shoaib Sheikh (CEO of Axact, a fake diploma company).
• Transport Link:
  • Some laundered money was invested in a private airline (Axis Airways) to legitimize funds.
  • Fake invoices for aviation fuel and aircraft maintenance were used to clean money.

---

6. Nigeria – Diezani Alison-Madueke (Oil & Aviation Money Laundering)​

• Key Figure: Former Nigerian Oil Minister Diezani Alison-Madueke.
• Transport Link:
  • She allegedly accepted bribes linked to private jet leases and aviation contracts.
  • Some funds were laundered through UK and UAE-based shell companies tied to transport businesses.

---

Common Patterns in These Cases:​

✔ Fake invoices for ships, planes, or fuel to justify money movements.
✔ Bribes to transport ministers for favorable contracts.
✔ Use of logistics hubs (Dubai, Panama, Singapore) to hide ownership.
✔ Private jets & luxury yachts purchased with dirty money.

 

[StoicGuy]

Their press statement and ncm statement released separately.
Content also very different.

These 2 stated clearly stated no contact before and after these event.

Ncm statement is no contact after su was investigated.

So..

 

[alph4tang0]

“I learnt later about the police investigations and subsequent criminal charges against Su. Thereafter, I had no further interactions with him.”

Why he didn't said the dinner was the only event? Instead said thereafter no further interactions? Does it imply before he learnt about the case, still got more makan dates?

 

[hardindex]

What does money launderer taking picture with minister serve any purpose?



A money launderer taking a photo with a minister (or any high-ranking official) serves multiple strategic purposes in the world of financial crime. While it may seem like a simple PR move, these photos can be weaponized to build credibility, intimidate rivals, and facilitate corruption. Here’s why it matters:

---

1. Building Legitimacy & Social Proof​

• "See? I’m connected!" – A photo with a powerful minister suggests political backing, making banks, investors, and regulators less suspicious.
• Helps open doors – Business partners or banks may be more willing to deal with someone who appears well-connected.
• Used in lobbying/networking – The photo can be shown to potential victims (e.g., investors in a Ponzi scheme) to gain trust.

Example:

• Jho Low (1MDB scandal) frequently posed with celebrities, politicians, and even US officials to appear legitimate before his fraud was exposed.

---

2. Intimidation & Protection​

• "Don’t mess with me" – A photo with a minister signals political protection, discouraging law enforcement or journalists from digging deeper.
• Deters audits/investigations – If a bank or tax authority sees a suspect with powerful allies, they might hesitate to probe further.

Example:

• In Russia and Central Asia, oligarchs often flaunt photos with Putin or other leaders to imply immunity from prosecution.

---

3. Facilitating Corruption & Bribery​

• Proof of access – A photo can be used to negotiate bribes ("I can get you a meeting with the minister if you pay me").
• Blackmail potential – If the minister is later compromised, the launderer may use the photo as leverage ("Remember our friendship?").

Example:

• In Brazil’s Operation Car Wash, construction firms used photos with politicians to secure inflated contracts.

---

4. Money Laundering & Fake Business Deals​

• Justifying suspicious transactions – If a launderer’s company suddenly wins a lucrative government transport contract, a photo with the minister helps explain the "legitimate" connection.
• Fake joint ventures – A photo can be used to create the illusion of a state-backed project, attracting investors to a scam.

Example:

• The Mozambique "Tuna Bond" scandal involved fake maritime projects promoted with government-linked endorsements.

---

5. Reputation Laundering ("Whitewashing")​

• Distracting from past crimes – A photo with a respected official helps rebrand a criminal as a "legitimate businessman."
• Used in media/press releases – Some fraudsters pay for PR coverage featuring such photos to appear reputable.

Example:

• Isabel dos Santos (Angola) used photos with world leaders to portray herself as a credible entrepreneur—while allegedly looting state funds.

---

Real Risks for the Minister​

• Guilt by association – Even if the minister is unaware, the photo can later tie them to scandals.
• Extortion risk – Criminals may use the photo to pressure the minister ("Help us, or we’ll leak this").

---

Conclusion: Why It Works​

A simple photo is more than just a souvenir—it’s a psychological weapon in financial crime. For a money launderer, it’s about:
Creating an illusion of legitimacy
Securing protection from scrutiny
Enabling corruption & bribery
Would you like examples of how such photos were later used as evidence in court cases?