Please clarify points

[BeerForBreakfast]

I was given points for the following comment, which I was only responding to a liar who posted outright historical revisionist comment that is also seditious, poster claims that the whole South China Sea belongs to China.

My comment “China was being raped blind by the Japanese. The Americans saved your torn asses.” In this post https://forums.hardwarezone.com.sg/...ense-secretary.6763954/page-14#post-142151892

@Dr.Vijay Kindly explain why your mods have classified the comment as inappropriate as the Japanese invasion of China is often referred to a landmark notorious incident that the Chinese themselves often harp on to no end, called The Rape of Nanking. This is a famous part of the Japanese invasion of China and WW2 which is the topic the poster I was addressing.

The rape word I use in the post has zero sexual connotations, and is only used because literally a famous WW2 event in China is called the Rape of Nanking. Please refer to
https://www.history.com/.amp/this-day-in-history/the-rape-of-nanking
Why am I infracted for using descriptions that are used by historians, journalists and academics? Especially when contrasted to how there are members who post outright insults against members’ family members, like their mothers, fathers, and the moderators tolerate such far more grievous and personal attacks? As found here #134 and #139 https://forums.hardwarezone.com.sg/...are-so-poor-wow.6764471/page-7#post-142156457

 

[IndianChief]

Guessing cause its not factual that their pigu was torn?

 

[BeerForBreakfast]

Guessing cause its not factual that their pigu was torn?

https://library.tamucc.edu/exhibits/s/hist4350/page/CCW
From Texas A&M university library
Chinese Comfort Women

By:Genesis Rodriguez​

Chinese comfort women are one of the most underrepresented divisions of comfort women. Forced to live in sexual slavery they are not very talked about in the common spheres of comfort women. During the occupation of China in the 1930’s, Chinese women became the largest group of women to be held by the Japanese military as sex slaves. Comfort women were often stolen, kidnapped or tricked into this cruel system of oppression. There are many different ethnic backgrounds of these comfort women but Chinese women were one of the first ones to become official comfort women. Since China was seen as one of the biggest threats against Japan, these women were completely treated with no remorse and a high level of violence. In this essay I want to discuss the way that these comfort women have had to overcome their history and are now fighting to gain recognition for the atrocities they faced.

One of the books that I found gives an amazing inside look into how it was for these women is Chinese Comfort Women: Testimonies from Imperial Japan's sex slaves, written by Peipei Qui. This novel is a series of works put together to give not only historical context but also to give primary accounts of what happened. One of the women that gave her oral history on what happened to her during her time as a comfort woman gives a good amount of information on the struggles she went through and the pain that she experienced. Liu Mianhuan is one of the oral histories and she tells her story of being kidnapped by the Japanese military and her experience. “The soldiers drove all the villagers to the meeting place where there were haystacks and, after forcing everyone to squat down, they began to pick out girls of the crowd.”[1] It all started by the soldiers picking out random girls from her village and taking them. They were repeatedly beaten and raped. While she was immensely miserable she tried to survive and reunite herself with her family. “I wanted to die but that would have saddened my parents, so I told myself not to die but to endure.”[2] These women were forced to be sex slaved and the only thing that would help them want to live would be the possibility to see their families again.

 

[BeerForBreakfast]

Furthermore, my post was a reply to a seditious poster who portrayed the Chinese as victors of WW2, as his basis of justification of laying claim to the entirety of Taiwan and the South China Sea. When in fact the Chinese, were not war victors but war losers, and was saved only by the American intervention in the Asia Pacific theatre of WW2. Well the rest is history.

That was why I responded to the seditious poster about how the Chinese were in fact, completely defeated and helpless under the Japanese. And the war crimes I highlighted were a big part of that.

 

[BeerForBreakfast]

I was given points for the following comment, which I was only responding to a liar who posted outright historical revisionist comment that is also seditious, poster claims that the whole South China Sea belongs to China.

My comment “China was being raped blind by the Japanese. The Americans saved your torn asses.” In this post https://forums.hardwarezone.com.sg/...ense-secretary.6763954/page-14#post-142151892

@Dr.Vijay Kindly explain why your mods have classified the comment as inappropriate as the Japanese invasion of China is often referred to a landmark notorious incident that the Chinese themselves often harp on to no end, called The Rape of Nanking. This is a famous part of the Japanese invasion of China and WW2 which is the topic the poster I was addressing.

The rape word I use in the post has zero sexual connotations, and is only used because literally a famous WW2 event in China is called the Rape of Nanking. Please refer to@
https://www.history.com/.amp/this-day-in-history/the-rape-of-nanking
Why am I infracted for using descriptions that are used by historians, journalists and academics? Especially when contrasted to how there are members who post outright insults against members’ family members, like their mothers, fathers, and the moderators tolerate such far more grievous and personal attacks? As found here #134 and #139 https://forums.hardwarezone.com.sg/...are-so-poor-wow.6764471/page-7#post-142156457

@Dr.Vijay

Here is from the article of the History Channel. https://www.history.com/.amp/this-day-in-history/the-rape-of-nanking

“To break the spirit of Chinese resistance, Japanese General Matsui Iwane ordered that the city of Nanking be destroyed. Much of the city was burned, and Japanese troops launched a campaign of atrocities against civilians. In what became known as the “Rape of Nanking,” the Japanese butchered an estimated 150,000 male “war prisoners,” massacred an additional 50,000 male civilians, and raped at least 20,000 women and girls of all ages, many of whom were mutilated or killed in the process.”

At least 20,000 Chinese women were raped blind by the Japanese in Nanking alone. China was saved by the US. And the Chinese were also used as comfort women and sex slaves by the Japanese. Therefore, can the mods clarify why my reply was inappropriate when I was educating the seditious poster with historical documented facts.

Thanks.

 

[PaulLevesque]

At least 20,000 Chinese women were raped blind by the Japanese in Nanking alone. China was saved by the US. And the Chinese were also used as comfort women and sex slaves by the Japanese.

If they are laped and need US to save them, how is that a victory?