kimsix
Arch-Supremacy Member
- Joined
- Jan 6, 2009
- Messages
- 20,313
- Reaction score
- 10,170
WOT from his FB!
Response to Lawrence Wong
______________________________
(Mandarin translation below)
The Straits Times reached out to me on Saturday evening for a response to Mr Lawrence Wong’s comments made at a PAP press conference which covered the PAP’s assessment of GE2020. This is my reply in full, the substance of which was carried in yesterday’s Sunday Times as attached here. The Mandarin translation of my comments follow below:
-
I refer to comments made by Mr Lawrence Wong at a PAP press conference on 18 Jul 2020.
Before GE2020, the Workers' Party (WP) held close to about 7% of the elected seats, represented by 6 MPs. This number has now increased to almost 11% of elected seats, represented by 10 MPs.
The WP remains far from its medium-term aim of securing 1/3 of the elected seats in Parliament, at which point the PAP would be denied a 2/3 majority of seats, preventing it from changing the Constitution - the highest law of our land - at will. To achieve this, the WP needs at least 32 elected MPs in Parliament. Even so, such an outcome would still give the ruling party a very strong mandate with 61 elected seats, allowing it to advance its agenda and policies.
In view of the WP’s GE2020 results - an increase of 4 seats - Mr Wong suggests that it is henceforth not enough for the WP to ask the government questions. Questioning any government of the day however, remains a fundamental role of a responsible opposition - not just in Singapore - but in any parliamentary democracy anywhere in the world. This duty is critical in holding the government to account and it will remain fundamental to the WP's work in Parliament.
Mr Wong argues that the WP is now expected to put forward serious policy alternatives to be scrutinised and debated. While the Government continues to have a 120,000-strong civil service as a potential resource for parliamentary debates, the WP continues to be primarily reliant on its volunteer base for its political work. Despite these constraints, we will continue to advance forward-looking suggestions for the welfare of Singaporeans. This includes proposals such as the Redundancy Insurance and alternative approaches to POFMA, both of which were raised in the previous session of Parliament. In addition, the WP will encourage public conversations - such as the prospects of HDB lease decay - and to that end, will release public working papers to highlight issues that significantly affect Singaporeans.
This term, our efforts in Parliament are centred on key bread-and-butter concerns; jobs for Singaporeans, healthcare for our seniors and more generally, cost of living concerns, amongst others. A key aspect of our focus will cover political issues that have a direct impact on transparency, accountability, balance and fairness.
What remains to be seen is whether the approach of the PAP Government towards greater information sharing will turn in favour of greater openness. The extent to which realistic policy alternatives can be advanced both in public and in Parliament is also a function the PAP's approach to democratic politics. Whatever the expectations the PAP have of the WP, the WP's purpose and approach in Parliament is to advance and achieve better outcomes for Singapore, and to champion the welfare of Singaporeans. We will remain steadfast and fully committed to that cause.

