agenda
Master Member
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2007
- Messages
- 4,127
- Reaction score
- 0
Hi guys, I'm about to graduate soon and will be running out of my student insurance so I have been looking at some to get myself covered and at the same time, with new earning power, I'm looking to do some capital appreciation.
After speaking to a friend about his products, I got a rough idea about what I can buy and also, have some doubts because it seems too good to be true. Did some research on the forum and it seems most people would not go for ILP.
Have some questions, hopefully you guys can help me clarify.
Some background info, my friend is from prudential. I am into investing, have done some forex trading but over the past 4 years, I'm still about negative $1,200, highest cumulative loss was about $2,500 as I'm pretty cash-strapped.
So I understand that I would minimally need to get a shieldplan which is pretty cheap but this is currently covered by my student insurance policy (but he keeps telling me, there's some sort of limited coverage) but anyway, I do not see an immediate need to get one within the next year.
Onward to the main gist:
It seems that ILP and Whole-life are much viable options than term life since you don't get money back at all. He did some arbitrary graphing and it seems term is pretty much a waste of money. Subsequently, he compared WL to ILP and it looks really good on paper, since the paid premiums is much lower on ILP. However, I noticed that his curve for ILP seemed intentionally drawn at the same level on the axis.
Shouldn't it function more as a s-curve with each curve overlapping and surpassing each other? I also read in the forums that there are alot of hidden fees here and there?
Looking at the funds under prudential, it seems that the performance over time is about 5%, reaching even 7%. I did more research and found that investing in REITs might actually be a better option since the return is pretty much the same minus the middle-man fees.
Considering all these, is it even worthwhile to consider any of these investment policies from insurance companies?
After speaking to a friend about his products, I got a rough idea about what I can buy and also, have some doubts because it seems too good to be true. Did some research on the forum and it seems most people would not go for ILP.
Have some questions, hopefully you guys can help me clarify.
Some background info, my friend is from prudential. I am into investing, have done some forex trading but over the past 4 years, I'm still about negative $1,200, highest cumulative loss was about $2,500 as I'm pretty cash-strapped.
So I understand that I would minimally need to get a shieldplan which is pretty cheap but this is currently covered by my student insurance policy (but he keeps telling me, there's some sort of limited coverage) but anyway, I do not see an immediate need to get one within the next year.
Onward to the main gist:
It seems that ILP and Whole-life are much viable options than term life since you don't get money back at all. He did some arbitrary graphing and it seems term is pretty much a waste of money. Subsequently, he compared WL to ILP and it looks really good on paper, since the paid premiums is much lower on ILP. However, I noticed that his curve for ILP seemed intentionally drawn at the same level on the axis.
Shouldn't it function more as a s-curve with each curve overlapping and surpassing each other? I also read in the forums that there are alot of hidden fees here and there?
Looking at the funds under prudential, it seems that the performance over time is about 5%, reaching even 7%. I did more research and found that investing in REITs might actually be a better option since the return is pretty much the same minus the middle-man fees.
Considering all these, is it even worthwhile to consider any of these investment policies from insurance companies?