miloaisdino
Senior Member
- Joined
- Mar 25, 2016
- Messages
- 843
- Reaction score
- 26
yup thats right! "wan aggregation" might create the wrong impression that it can be used to "aggregate the bandwidth" of two different wan connections, when its actually link bonding to a single wan connection (single public ip), or the "aggregation of 2 ethernet links to form a single wan connection"! what i meant to say is that the "wan aggregation" feature is for link bonding and not the combination of 2 wan connections. thats why usually the words load balance or link bonding/link aggregation (with the word link) are more commonly used in enterprise networking (eg cisco, juniper etc)! link aggregation can refer to both upstream and downstream connectionsSo in the end it is just terminalogy usage difference. You use the word "bonding", router vendors use the word "aggregation".
Router vendors differtiate WAN aggregation (up stream, or the ISP) and LAN/Link aggregation (down stream, devices connected to the router).
This "bonding" or "aggregation" requires support of LACP (802.3ad), either upstream (ISP ONT/ONT) for WAN aggregation, or downstream (device, with dual sport Ethernet, like NAS or PC) for LAN/Link aggregation.
Last edited: