Reading firm's annual reports

kingsfall

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Jul 31, 2011
Messages
23,728
Reaction score
1,149
does anyone know what does "Net change in fair value of
investment properties" really meant? it takes up a chunk of money. do i count it into the net income or not?
 

Shiny Things

Supremacy Member
Joined
Dec 13, 2009
Messages
9,605
Reaction score
854
does anyone know what does "Net change in fair value of
investment properties" really meant? it takes up a chunk of money. do i count it into the net income or not?

Sounds like the company's marking-to-market the value of its real-estate assets.

This seems to me like quite an unusual accounting treatment, because it's basically impossible to accurately revalue an investment property unless you sell it. If this is making up a big chunk of net income, this should be a huge red flag.

Care to name names? You can drop me a PM if you want.
 

derrick_

Supremacy Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2006
Messages
5,618
Reaction score
18
I think you can read up on FRS 40 Investment property.

It basically says all gain/loss from investment property goes to P&L. So the accouting treatment is correct.

Note that when accountant says Fair value, they are usally refering to market value, which is evaluated by a property valuer base on similiar transactions.
 

lzydata

Supremacy Member
Joined
Oct 16, 2010
Messages
6,756
Reaction score
3,118
I'm guessing this is a REIT...

It makes sense that Net change in fair value of investment properties is recorded as a profit or loss on the income statement, because these changes are also made to the company's assets on the balance sheet.

If you are concerned that this is a non-cash profit or loss so it is less real than the rest of net income, you can look at the cash flow statement where non-cash items such as property value changes and depreciation are excluded. For REITs, there is also the statement for distributable income (or "amount available for distribution to unitholders") that likewise cannot include non-cash items.
 

peterchan75

Supremacy Member
Joined
Apr 26, 2003
Messages
6,757
Reaction score
533
The most important is the trend of top line (income) and botton line(income less expense). Can't sustain for long the bottom line with shrinking top line. The are many tricks that accountant can do e.g. delay in recognising the bad, take in reserve when business is good etc etc etc... all these are within the framework of accounting. Believe you me, the sales folks know to manage to top line too.. :s13: Smart accountants know to avoid steping on tails that link to the arse of the bosses. Such skills are essential to climbing the corp ladder. :o
 

satayxp

Banned
Joined
May 10, 2004
Messages
151,806
Reaction score
5,152
Yeah, that was my thought too. If this is a REIT it makes sense; if it's not, then it seems like a big red flag for them to be pumping up their PnL with real estate gains.

some companies do hold investment ppty.. fair value gain (or loss) will still be recognised mah..
 

wahkao3

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2005
Messages
26,802
Reaction score
24
if you are looking at the property firm's earning powers, DO NOT LOOK AT NET INCOME

Look at cashflow from operations

I encountered situation where cashflow from operations is not available. in that case use revenue as the closest proxy.
 
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ Forums. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts. Please refer to our Community Guidelines and Standards and Terms and Conditions for more information.
Top