luckyplate
Senior Member
- Joined
- May 24, 2010
- Messages
- 567
- Reaction score
- 74
No good news ?? ..trustee cannot be trusted ...Singapore a corrupted country ...
I received the EGM notice. I will vote yes to all resolutions.EGM liao.
Finally.
Trustee's spending of shareholders' monies has been totally ridiculous.
7 months already and internal manager still not ready yet!
Will vote yes to all the resolutions to check their spending
Does anyone have the full article ?
those party who make trouble should end up paying all the court fees out of their pocket. This should be done .High Court dismisses ESR’s appeal to vote on Sabana Reit’s proposed trust deed amendment
https://www.businesstimes.com.sg/co...te-sabana-reits-proposed-trust-deed-amendment
The Reit will proceed with its extraordinary general meeting on Aug 6
THE Singapore High Court has thrown out an appeal by several ESR entities to vote on the proposed trust deed amendments of Sabana Industrial Real Estate Investment Trust (Sabana Reit).
It also ordered the entities to pay HSBC Institutional Trust Services (Singapore) – the Reit’s trustee – S$16,119.80 in legal costs, with the remaining costs and expenses to be paid out of the trust.
On Friday (Jul 26), the trustee noted that the court would issue reasons for its decision at a later date. It also added that the Reit would proceed with the extraordinary general meeting (EGM) on Aug 6.
In a statement seen by The Business Times, Sabana Growth Internalisation Committee (SGIC), set up by unit holders including Quarz Capital, said the ruling “clarifies and strengthens” investor protection in Singapore.
SGIC also urged all unitholders to vote for the resolutions in favour of the internalisation at the EGM.
The committee said: “The successful internalisation of Sabana Reit will allow all unit holders to own the manager. It will bring about stronger corporate governance, investor protection, higher distribution per unit (DPU) and the revival of the Singapore Reit market.”
The committee also asked Sabana’s manager and trustee to protect unit holders’ interest by returning costs and DPU withheld to them.
It also requested the sponsor and the owner of the trust’s current manager to protect jobs, uphold corporate practices, as well as waive non-compete agreements and allow the current staff of the external manager to join the new entity.
ESR’s appeal came after the court in May ruled that the trust deed amendments are required to effect the internalisation of Sabana’s manager, but barred the entities from voting on them.
The court ruling arose from an Order 32 application submitted by the trustee in January to clarify steps for the internalisation process.
In the application, the trustee sought court declarations that proposed amendments to the trust deed were required to implement internalisation. It also sought a declaration on whether ESR entities ought to be permitted to vote on the amendments.
ESR entities were prohibited from voting as the court deemed them to have an interest from fee income the external manager earns.