- Joined
- Jul 14, 2005
- Messages
- 36,704
- Reaction score
- 8,727
Let me share some benchmarks results for those whom are interested. Like what @Jurong640 mentioned, it is the same Exynos 2400 used in the S24 and S24+, so will not be testing in depth
Geekbench 6 Results:
3Dmark Wildlife Extreme Stress Test:
Antutu Benchmark:
GPS (L1 + L5):
Thoughts after running these tests:
1. Stability of the 3Dmark Wildlife Extreme stress test is decent but not impressive. Throttling will bound to occur when gaming for sure.
2. Phone is not heating up that much during the course of benchmarking. The only heating up which I felt is during the 3Dmark Wildlife Extreme stress test where it is running 20 rounds of benchmark.
3. Cost cutting measures detected, phone is using UFS 3.x instead of UFS 4.x storage. Nevertheless, day to day performance since decent, but I can feel some slight stutters when navigating around the UI. Not as often as A56, but it is still present. At least it is still using the LPDDR5X ram instead of LPDDR5 on the A56.
4. CPU performs almost like a Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, just slightly slower. Actually, I will have prefer the phone to be using Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 or a Dimensity 9300/9300+. But, can see that Samsung is taking initiative to improve their own chips as reviews on Exynos 2500 yield surprising results (Looking at Tensor G5
and Google's decision to move away from Samsung fab and I am laughing loudly in 1 corner
)
5. Surprisingly, dual band GPS! This surprises me as I thought Samsung will chop this up for cost cutting measures. L1 and L5 GPS!
Geekbench 6 Results:
3Dmark Wildlife Extreme Stress Test:
Antutu Benchmark:
GPS (L1 + L5):
Thoughts after running these tests:
1. Stability of the 3Dmark Wildlife Extreme stress test is decent but not impressive. Throttling will bound to occur when gaming for sure.
2. Phone is not heating up that much during the course of benchmarking. The only heating up which I felt is during the 3Dmark Wildlife Extreme stress test where it is running 20 rounds of benchmark.
3. Cost cutting measures detected, phone is using UFS 3.x instead of UFS 4.x storage. Nevertheless, day to day performance since decent, but I can feel some slight stutters when navigating around the UI. Not as often as A56, but it is still present. At least it is still using the LPDDR5X ram instead of LPDDR5 on the A56.
4. CPU performs almost like a Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, just slightly slower. Actually, I will have prefer the phone to be using Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 or a Dimensity 9300/9300+. But, can see that Samsung is taking initiative to improve their own chips as reviews on Exynos 2500 yield surprising results (Looking at Tensor G5
and Google's decision to move away from Samsung fab and I am laughing loudly in 1 corner
)5. Surprisingly, dual band GPS! This surprises me as I thought Samsung will chop this up for cost cutting measures. L1 and L5 GPS!
Last edited:
