Samsung swapping flash controller lololololololol

Koenig168

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Nov 4, 2007
Messages
10,037
Reaction score
1,748
Can't decide whether the old or new version is better. 173% more SLC cache at 115GB so faster for file transfers using the cache. However, 47% lower sustained write speeds so really slow for big file transfers exceeding the SLC cache.
 

ragnarok95

Senior Moderator
Senior Moderator
Joined
Mar 9, 2004
Messages
125,208
Reaction score
6,447
Can't decide whether the old or new version is better. 173% more SLC cache at 115GB so faster for file transfers using the cache. However, 47% lower sustained write speeds so really slow for big file transfers exceeding the SLC cache.
Do you always big file transfer?
 

watzup_ken

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Nov 21, 2003
Messages
25,670
Reaction score
2,123
Can't decide whether the old or new version is better. 173% more SLC cache at 115GB so faster for file transfers using the cache. However, 47% lower sustained write speeds so really slow for big file transfers exceeding the SLC cache.
Depends on your usage really. Most people will not feel the difference because we don't write that much to the SSD such that it overflows from the SLC. I suspect if you edit videos and photos, then it could potentially impact you.
 

KYOGRE

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 21, 2005
Messages
917
Reaction score
63
At least the performance is not worst compared to other scummy manufacturers. Seems this revisions is using 980 pro controller running in PCIe 3 mode.
 
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ Forums. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts. Please refer to our Community Guidelines and Standards and Terms and Conditions for more information.
Top