(SD) MicroSD benchmarks!

[lenseview]

Both of your results seems weird to me. Seems like your system/setup is bottlenecking somewhere.

You are using the Kingston Advanced Class 10 UHS-I (64GB) [Also Known As Kingston UltimateX MicroSD] [SDCX10]

Which in this case should be about


See our benchmark for kingston here

As for Samsung Evo:


And the benchmark for samsung evo is here

Now still have people buy kingston memory card? Previously i would tell customer to get sandisk instead.

 

[xtramadness]

Lols... What customer u have?

 

[noobiee]

have TS redeemed the evo+ card?

 

[xtramadness]

have TS redeemed the evo+ card?

No. Only 177 pts now. Need 6 more nights to get it

 

[koreanlover]

Then the results will be skewered and not really comparable

lol then ask them to lend you the card lo.

 

[davidau]

Hi, well it really depends. Why not you contact samsung directly?

http://www.samsung.com/sg/info/contactus.html

Otherwise, drop me an email, will help direct you

Hello, thanks you for your offer what is your email?

 

[davidau]

I am at 177 now... 400 - 177 = 223 = 6 days. If 6 days later still got stock.. in the first place

Hi, dont mind to share what is this about? It's seem like can redeem the SD card, how can I redeem the SD card too?

 

[davidau]

Hi guys, I have a doubt. Now I have 1 samsung micro sd class 6 & 1 scandisk class 10 which 1 is faster?

 

[NWT1978]

No. Only 177 pts now. Need 6 more nights to get it

I guess u redeem other items since your points were higher than me...

 

[Kennedy]

Both of your results seems weird to me. Seems like your system/setup is bottlenecking somewhere.

You are using the Kingston Advanced Class 10 UHS-I (64GB) [Also Known As Kingston UltimateX MicroSD] [SDCX10]

Which in this case should be about

See our benchmark for kingston here

As for Samsung Evo:

And the benchmark for samsung evo is here

my overall consistent write speed.
Kingston 64GB 10 mb/s
Kingston 32GB 10-12 mb/s
Samsung 32 and 64 GB 14-15 mb/s

maybe my speed is significantly slower because I am using those cheap $1 microsd usb adapter for the cards, and connect it to the computer front panel USB 2.0 port. later, I test the speed with it inside the handphone to a laptop USB 3.0 port.

I have Kingston class 10 card, if I managed to get a samsung evo, I will test it out and share over here.

ok. thanks.

 

[Valour]

my overall consistent write speed.
Kingston 64GB 10 mb/s
Kingston 32GB 10-12 mb/s
Samsung 32 and 64 GB 14-15 mb/s

maybe my speed is significantly slower because I am using those cheap $1 microsd usb adapter for the cards, and connect it to the computer front panel USB 2.0 port. later, I test the speed with it inside the handphone to a laptop USB 3.0 port.




ok. thanks.

I wonder if you connect directly to a decent micro sd card reader, will the transfer speed be more consistent and accurate? I just bought a new transcend reader recently.

 

[IlovePCW-ing]

best is TS benchmark himself

using the same computer specs

 

[Ohayo!]

I am at 177 now... 400 - 177 = 223 = 6 days. If 6 days later still got stock.. in the first place

just try lor. if really cmi then grab the 32gb normal evo

 

[WhiteAnt]

best is TS benchmark himself

using the same computer specs

Yup same computer same run test

 

[lenseview]

Hi guys, I have a doubt. Now I have 1 samsung micro sd class 6 & 1 scandisk class 10 which 1 is faster?

Of cause class 10 is faster. But also device dependent.

 

[yknyong1]

16GB EVO

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
CrystalDiskMark 3.0.3 x64 (C) 2007-2013 hiyohiyo
Crystal Dew World : http://crystalmark.info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
* MB/s = 1,000,000 byte/s [SATA/300 = 300,000,000 byte/s]

Sequential Read : 43.531 MB/s
Sequential Write : 14.333 MB/s
Random Read 512KB : 41.859 MB/s
Random Write 512KB : 27.477 MB/s
Random Read 4KB (QD=1) : 5.793 MB/s [ 1414.3 IOPS]
Random Write 4KB (QD=1) : 1.953 MB/s [ 476.7 IOPS]
Random Read 4KB (QD=32) : 7.174 MB/s [ 1751.4 IOPS]
Random Write 4KB (QD=32) : 1.552 MB/s [ 379.0 IOPS]

Test : 50 MB [K: 0.0% (0.0/14.9 GB)] (x5)
Date : 2015/08/14 22:26:33
OS : Windows 8.1 Pro [6.3 Build 9600] (x64)

 

[yknyong1]

EVO+ 32GB

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
CrystalDiskMark 3.0.3 x64 (C) 2007-2013 hiyohiyo
Crystal Dew World : http://crystalmark.info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
* MB/s = 1,000,000 byte/s [SATA/300 = 300,000,000 byte/s]

Sequential Read : 43.538 MB/s
Sequential Write : 25.283 MB/s
Random Read 512KB : 42.494 MB/s
Random Write 512KB : 35.025 MB/s
Random Read 4KB (QD=1) : 8.083 MB/s [ 1973.3 IOPS]
Random Write 4KB (QD=1) : 3.924 MB/s [ 957.9 IOPS]
Random Read 4KB (QD=32) : 8.202 MB/s [ 2002.5 IOPS]
Random Write 4KB (QD=32) : 3.936 MB/s [ 961.1 IOPS]

Test : 50 MB [K: 0.0% (0.0/29.8 GB)] (x5)
Date : 2015/08/14 22:37:43
OS : Windows 8.1 Pro [6.3 Build 9600] (x64)

 

[yknyong1]

EVO+ write performance is approximately double that of EVO's

 

[ongrasp]

Hmmm.... How accurate is your test vs xtramadness test?

 

[renclim]

Wow.. The 32GB EVO seems good....