[Serious] Can we review dark84

[Broadwalk]

Moderators, please kindly review dark84 [Serious] thread. This person has been creating multiple [Serious] which in my opinion is never serious and often being ridiculous by many others.

I have bk dark84 threads but seems there is no action taken to address this person [Serious] threads.

So may I know what is the purpose of moderation team allowing this person dark84 creating mutiple [Serious] which has very little to zero serious level?

Please kindly review and consider give a perm ban to this person. Thank you for your attention.

 

[kosongice]

People ridicule him doesn't make it any less serious.

Do you have any concrete proof that what he says is not the truth?

Case closed, no further action will be taken.

Sent from my Legendary Phone using GAGT

 

[Perisher]

People ridicule him doesn't make it any less serious.

Do you have any concrete proof that what he says is not the truth?

Case closed, no further action will be taken.

Sent from my Legendary Phone using GAGT

example, this thread lor...
http://deluxeforums.hardwarezone.co...tegy-so-far-100%-wont-lose-money-5415228.html

 

[Broadwalk]

Anyway I am requesting moderator team to review my request. Just feel this person has created far too much serious thread which is misleading.

 

[Broadwalk]

Why my request was not answer other than one moderator joining in and set up an example of how dark84 mislead the people? I have seen more and more rampant threads from him despite my feedback in here though none has responded to me yet.

Is my feedback useless or no significance?

 

[dnsfpl]

just add him in your ignore list

problem solved

 

[SBC]

Like MIW is always rite. In forum, mod is always rite.

 

[bosssaizo]

hmm chill man.

he is a bigcanonfairy.

So folks in here already knew to take his threads with a pinch of salt. Might wanna add him into the ignore list.

 

[Broadwalk]

hmm chill man.

he is a bigcanonfairy.

So folks in here already knew to take his threads with a pinch of salt. Might wanna add him into the ignore list.

I knew he is one. However, knowing and allowing it is the right way to handle such situation. Akin to ban at least I feel this man deserves a yellow card. A periodical ban for him is necessary. Else he would be just another cry wolf boy with his multiple serious thread which holds zero meaning.

 

[kosongice]

I knew he is one. However, knowing and allowing it is the right way to handle such situation. Akin to ban at least I feel this man deserves a yellow card. A periodical ban for him is necessary. Else he would be just another cry wolf boy with his multiple serious thread which holds zero meaning.

By that same token numerous people would have been banned in EDMW already.

Just ignore him if you feel he's annoying. Pretty sure quite a huge number of people enjoy his threads.

Sent from my Legendary Phone using GAGT

 

[ThorOdinson]

I think the question that must be asked is, how binding is the [SERIOUS] tag. So if someone uses the serious tag but post nonsense, does it means it is an infraction? If so, then by all means infract Dark84. But then this would also have to be enforced upon all other users.

 

[Broadwalk]

I think the question that must be asked is, how binding is the [SERIOUS] tag. So if someone uses the serious tag but post nonsense, does it means it is an infraction? If so, then by all means infract Dark84. But then this would also have to be enforced upon all other users.

I totally concur with the above.

The [SERIOUS] tag should be respected and not taken lightly. Else someone could just anyhow create such troll threads which can be very deceiving yet moderator say it is for entertainment purpose? If it is so why ban others in the past? So enforcement has to be fair and consistent.

kym?