Stocks or ETF

cheongmanz

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Oct 2, 2017
Messages
26,725
Reaction score
6,910
For long term investment, is it better to...

1) Time the market and invest on stable blue chips for substantial dividend payout

or

2) Apply DCA on ETF

I'm talking about sg context
 

Mecisteus

Great Supremacy Member
Joined
Jun 16, 2002
Messages
55,743
Reaction score
12,224
Statistics show majority will lose money trying to actively manage their money.

You need to try out yourself to see which camp you belong to.

If you keep losing money, then you need to change your approach. Don't continue to throw good money after bad.
 

peterchan75

Supremacy Member
Joined
Apr 26, 2003
Messages
6,752
Reaction score
533
Statistics show majority will lose money trying to actively manage their money.

You need to try out yourself to see which camp you belong to.

If you keep losing money, then you need to change your approach. Don't continue to throw good money after bad.

Penny stocks move from 10 cents to 20 cents in just a matter of days. That's a 100% gain mind you.:eek:
Very exciting wor! :D
But the majority move from 10 cents to 2 cents. :o
 

Mecisteus

Great Supremacy Member
Joined
Jun 16, 2002
Messages
55,743
Reaction score
12,224
Penny stocks move from 10 cents to 20 cents in just a matter of days. That's a 100% gain mind you.:eek:
Very exciting wor! :D
But the majority move from 10 cents to 2 cents. :o

Upside is unlimited but downside is limited to 100%. :D
 

beefjerky

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2014
Messages
1,056
Reaction score
12
Taking a local degree right now but after 3 years, ive come to realise im not as smart as the market, purely doing etf now with some leftover individual shares from the past =(
 

fr33d0m

Master Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2008
Messages
3,711
Reaction score
729
Unless you are very good at selecting stocks, start with at most 20% of you total portfolio actively managed.

You will realise how good you are very soon and adjust your strategy.
 

Maeda_Toshiie

Supremacy Member
Joined
May 12, 2007
Messages
6,310
Reaction score
3
I've noticed the stocks that give good dividends tend to have less capital gains

That's kind of expected. Setting aside REITs, companies generally give out dividends because they don't have better opportunities to reinvest in themselves in order increase revenue.
 

Shiny Things

Supremacy Member
Joined
Dec 13, 2009
Messages
9,605
Reaction score
854
For long term investment, is it better to...

1) Time the market and invest on stable blue chips for substantial dividend payout

or

2) Apply DCA on ETF

I'm talking about sg context

You've sort of got two questions conflated into one here.

Option 1 is "time the market, and buy a narrow basket of stocks"
Option 2 is "don't time the market, and buy a broad basket of stocks"

Those are two different things, though they reflect two main priorities:

Option 1 is "I think I can trade better than the market as a whole"
Option 2 is "I don't think I can trade better than the market as a whole, so I'll be satisfied with an average return".

The problem is that option 1 is sort of self-defeating! Think about it like this:

1) Before fees, the average investor in option 1 is going to earn the same as the average investor in option 2.

Why is it so?

The total money invested in the market is going to earn the average market return, and the money invested in option 2 is going to earn that same return. So the money invested in option 1 is, on average, going to earn that same return. Before fees.

2) After fees, the average investor in option 1 is going to earn less than the average investor in option 2.

Why is it so?

Actively managed funds, and active individual traders, tend to trade more often: so they run up higher transaction costs and more spread costs. If they have the same average return before fees, and option 1 has higher fees, then after fees, option 1 will have less money.

3) You are probably an average investor - in fact, probably below-average.

Why is it so?

The reason banks' trading desks and market-making companies are so fabulously profitable is that most of their retail customers systematically lose money. Active trading, especially for individual traders, is basically a firehose of cash from your pocket to the banks' trading desks.

So option 1 doesn't just start with the same returns before fees - it starts with lower returns before fees, and has higher fees.

4) Therefore, you will probably end up with less money in option 1 than in option 2.

5) So why not just skip straight to option 2 and save yourself some time?
 
Last edited:

cheongmanz

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Oct 2, 2017
Messages
26,725
Reaction score
6,910
Before fees, the average investor in option 1 is going to earn the same as the average investor in option 2.

Why is it so?

The total money invested in the market is going to earn the average market return, and the money invested in option 2 is going to earn that same return. So the money invested in option 1 is, on average, going to earn that same return. Before fees.

2) After fees, the average investor in option 1 is going to earn less than the average investor in option 2.

Why is it so?

Actively managed funds, and active individual traders, tend to trade more often: so they run up higher transaction costs and more spread costs. If they have the same average return before fees, and option 1 has higher fees, then after fees, option 1 will have less money.

For option 1, my intention is to trade a few times when timing the market and let dividend flow into my account. So it should be only a few transaction fees

For option 2, I believe by applying DCA on ETF, I am trading consistently say monthly irregardless whether the price goes up or down. It this case, I am also paying transaction fees every month, isn't it?

In this case, how is option 2 a better decision? I am curious to know.
 

cheongmanz

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Oct 2, 2017
Messages
26,725
Reaction score
6,910
I've noticed the stocks that give good dividends tend to have less capital gains

My intention is to leverage on dividend. Capital gain to me is a bonus. Besides if I time the market, most stocks should be low in price.
 

swordsly

Master Member
Joined
Jan 16, 2008
Messages
3,400
Reaction score
0
For option 1, my intention is to trade a few times when timing the market and let dividend flow into my account. So it should be only a few transaction fees

For option 2, I believe by applying DCA on ETF, I am trading consistently say monthly irregardless whether the price goes up or down. It this case, I am also paying transaction fees every month, isn't it?

In this case, how is option 2 a better decision? I am curious to know.

What you say is only valid if in option 1, you only buy 1 counter.
But you would know better than to put your eggs into just 1 counter.

When you buy the ETF, you have effectively bought multiple counters all for 1 trade.
If you were to buy N of the holdings in the ETF, that would already be N trades.
So here, you would already be paying more (unless like I said, you only buy 1 counter).

DCA doesn't always mean you should do it monthly even though that's kinda like a default. So long you regularly buy regardless of market conditions, you would be doing DCA as well (overall effectiveness may vary).
 

cheongmanz

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Oct 2, 2017
Messages
26,725
Reaction score
6,910
What you say is only valid if in option 1, you only buy 1 counter.
But you would know better than to put your eggs into just 1 counter.

When you buy the ETF, you have effectively bought multiple counters all for 1 trade.
If you were to buy N of the holdings in the ETF, that would already be N trades.
So here, you would already be paying more (unless like I said, you only buy 1 counter).

DCA doesn't always mean you should do it monthly even though that's kinda like a default. So long you regularly buy regardless of market conditions, you would be doing DCA as well (overall effectiveness may vary).

Yes I understand that it is not advisable to put all eggs in one basket. ETF is also the safer approach when applying DCA. But something that holds me back on ETF is the management fee (I presume is monthly) and accumulated transaction fees.
 

JetStorm

Senior Member
Joined
May 27, 2007
Messages
1,842
Reaction score
297
Yes I understand that it is not advisable to put all eggs in one basket. ETF is also the safer approach when applying DCA. But something that holds me back on ETF is the management fee (I presume is monthly) and accumulated transaction fees.
ETF management is already low. As Swordsly already mentioned above, if you buy all the stocks seperately in the ETF, the fees will definetely be more than the ETF alone. Many pros and cons between individual stocks vs an etf. Etf have minimal risk in the event one of the individual stocks goes bankrupt.

Etf also have lesser earning potential compared to the returns on an individual stocks.

Ultimately see which side u are more concerned with amd your risk appetite.

If risk is of minimal concern, you can even try the dogs and puppy strategy.

Sent from Samsung SM-G950F using GAGT
 

swordsly

Master Member
Joined
Jan 16, 2008
Messages
3,400
Reaction score
0
Yes I understand that it is not advisable to put all eggs in one basket. ETF is also the safer approach when applying DCA. But something that holds me back on ETF is the management fee (I presume is monthly) and accumulated transaction fees.

And thus you look for ETFs with low management fees and expense ratio.
The management fees are also automatically deducted from the entire NAV/cash pool I think (I hope I didn't get my understanding wrong). It isn't deducted from individual stockholders.

And again, you don't have to do it monthly. Or rather, you should run your simulation to see how much transaction fees are you really going to chalk up. What it is over your potential time-weighted returns.

Or or or! You can attempt to do both. Have 2 portfolios, one active and one DCA. That way, you can see just how good you are at timing the market and decide if you should continue. In the event you dont, you still have your ETF portfolio (kinda like keeping bonds in our investment portfolio) as some form of counterweight. Do bear in mind your returns will not be as awesome as option 1 (in its ideal case) and option 2.

Disclaimer: I'm a newb and still learning so the above is just a suggestion. I'm personally trying this as well, having a small portion being actively managed while the rest are in my POSB Invest Saver (and soon IWDA once I save up enough).
 
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ Forums. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts. Please refer to our Community Guidelines and Standards and Terms and Conditions for more information.
Top