dell new 34inch ultra wide release
https://www.dell.com/en-sg/shop/ali...5dw/apd/210-brpp/monitors-monitor-accessories
https://www.dell.com/en-sg/shop/ali...5dw/apd/210-brpp/monitors-monitor-accessories
please tag me also, this weekend will go funan and see the text fringing firstOk will wait for sales
One of the monitor i aiming to replace my AW3423DWF. I hate how AW3423DWF cannot run 10bits on 165Hz with DP and you need tweak for it to work.dell new 34inch ultra wide release
https://www.dell.com/en-sg/shop/ali...5dw/apd/210-brpp/monitors-monitor-accessories
selling your AW3423DWF for how much?One of the monitor i aiming to replace my AW3423DWF. I hate how AW3423DWF cannot run 10bits on 165Hz with DP and you need tweak for it to work.
Depends on your monitor actually. some monitor is not true HDMI 2.1 48Gbps, most reputable brand will mentioned it in manual or website.Hi guys, which cable are you using to connect to your 4k monitors? I tried both DP 1.4 (my gtx4070 only supports up to DP1.4a) and HDMI 2.1. I find that HDMI 2.1 is much better especially playing high res 4k videos.
My research tells me that DP2.1 will give better performance but too bad graphics can't support.
Depends on your monitor actually. some monitor is not true HDMI 2.1 48Gbps, most reputable brand will mentioned it in manual or website.
DP1.4 native is QHD 144hz still good if you are not exceeding the monitor refresh rate, with DSC can also archieve 10bit native (some monitor was 8bit+FRC which is not true 10bit will show some defect if your eyes is very sensitve to colors) & 12bit if your monitor is support.
HDMI 2.1 can support gsync compatible too.Ya it does mention on the LG site. HDMI 2.1 only supports VRR though, to make use of NVDIA gsync I have to connect using DP.
![]()
Ya it does mention on the LG site. HDMI 2.1 only supports VRR though, to make use of NVDIA gsync I have to connect using DP.
![]()
Yes the colour is better it seemsBoth HDMI and DP support G-sync. I've tried both and it works. HDMI 2.1 at least to me, has noticeably better colors and alt-tabbing out of games do not black screen like DP 1.4 does.
| Feature | ASUS ROG PG27UCDM | MSI MPG272URX | Samsung Odyssey G81SF | Alienware AW2725Q |
| Panel | 4th-gen QD-OLED | 4th-gen QD-OLED | 4th-gen QD-OLED (matte) | 4th-gen QD-OLED |
| Size/PPI | 27" / 166 PPI | 27" / 166 PPI | 27" / 166 PPI | 26.5" / 166 PPI |
| Brightness (SDR/HDR) | 463nits / 1000+nits | 257nits / 963nits | 273nits / 1006nits | 273nits / 1031nits (Dolby Vision) |
| Response Time | 0.327ms (avg) | 0.339ms (avg) | 0.325ms (avg) | 0.327ms (avg) |
| Ports | DP2.1, 2x HDMI 2.1, USB-C (90W) | DP2.1, 2x HDMI 2.1, USB-C (98W) | DP1.4, 2x HDMI 2.1 | DP1.4, 2x HDMI 2.1, USB-C (15W) |
| HDR Support | HDR10, Dolby Vision | HDR10 | HDR10+ | HDR10, Dolby Vision |
| Cooling | Built-in heat sink | Graphene coating | Heat pipes + graphene | Active fan |
| Anti-Glare | Glossy (AR coating) | Glossy (AR coating) | Custom matte | Glossy (AR coating) |
| Color Accuracy | ΔE 0.76 (P3) | ΔE 1.04 (P3) | ΔE 1.27 (P3) | ΔE 0.7 (P3) |
| OSD Menu | User-friendly | Functional but basic | Highly customizable | Clunky navigation |
| Design | ROG "claw" stand, RGB | Minimalist, flat base | Metal chassis, RGB lighting | 30th-anniversary "tumbler" design |
| Price (Est.) | $$$$ | $$$ | $$$$ | $$$$$ |
| Model | Pros | Cons |
| ASUS PG27UCDM | - DP2.1, Dolby Vision - Best brightness (SDR/HDR) - Clean OSD | - Glossy screen reflections - No advanced cooling |
| MSI MPG272URX | - DP2.1, 98W USB-C - Affordable - Solid color accuracy | - Low SDR brightness - Conservative HDR tuning |
| Samsung G81SF | - Matte anti-glare - Dynamic cooling - High HDR adjustability | - No DP2.1 - Complex OSD |
| Alienware AW2725Q | - Dolby Vision, best HDR peak - Unique design, active cooling | - DP1.4 only - Green tint in P3 mode - Expensive |
So there are glossy monitors or is this semi glossy? [highlighted in blue]Here's a detailed comparison table of the ASUS ROG PG27UCDM, MSI MPG272URX, Samsung Odyssey G81SF, and Alienware AW2725Q monitors:
4K 240Hz QD-OLED Monitor Comparison (2025 Models)
Feature ASUS ROG PG27UCDM MSI MPG272URX Samsung Odyssey G81SF Alienware AW2725Q Panel 4th-gen QD-OLED 4th-gen QD-OLED 4th-gen QD-OLED (matte) 4th-gen QD-OLED Size/PPI 27" / 166 PPI 27" / 166 PPI 27" / 166 PPI 26.5" / 166 PPI Brightness (SDR/HDR) 463nits / 1000+nits 257nits / 963nits 273nits / 1006nits 273nits / 1031nits (Dolby Vision) Response Time 0.327ms (avg) 0.339ms (avg) 0.325ms (avg) 0.327ms (avg) Ports DP2.1, 2x HDMI 2.1, USB-C (90W) DP2.1, 2x HDMI 2.1, USB-C (98W) DP1.4, 2x HDMI 2.1 DP1.4, 2x HDMI 2.1, USB-C (15W) HDR Support HDR10, Dolby Vision HDR10 HDR10+ HDR10, Dolby Vision Cooling Built-in heat sink Graphene coating Heat pipes + graphene Active fan Anti-Glare Glossy (AR coating) Glossy (AR coating) Custom matte Glossy (AR coating) Color Accuracy ΔE 0.76 (P3) ΔE 1.04 (P3) ΔE 1.27 (P3) ΔE 0.7 (P3) OSD Menu User-friendly Functional but basic Highly customizable Clunky navigation Design ROG "claw" stand, RGB Minimalist, flat base Metal chassis, RGB lighting 30th-anniversary "tumbler" design Price (Est.) $$$$ $$$ $$$$ $$$$$
Pros & Cons Summary
Model Pros Cons ASUS PG27UCDM - DP2.1, Dolby Vision
- Best brightness (SDR/HDR)
- Clean OSD- Glossy screen reflections
- No advanced coolingMSI MPG272URX - DP2.1, 98W USB-C
- Affordable
- Solid color accuracy- Low SDR brightness
- Conservative HDR tuningSamsung G81SF - Matte anti-glare
- Dynamic cooling
- High HDR adjustability- No DP2.1
- Complex OSDAlienware AW2725Q - Dolby Vision, best HDR peak
- Unique design, active cooling- DP1.4 only
- Green tint in P3 mode
- Expensive
Key Takeaways:
- For Competitive Gamers: ASUS (DP2.1) or Alienware (Dolby Vision).
- Bright Room Use: Samsung (matte coating).
- Budget Pick: MSI (best value).
- HDR Creators: Alienware or ASUS (Dolby Vision).
it is semi glossySo there are glossy monitors or is this semi glossy? [highlighted in blue]
From what i know, Oled are still matte monitor with super color saturations due to distinct black.
Still finding local warranty glossy monitor that is 120hz will do