Supplementary Retirement Scheme - logic

epigram

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2000
Messages
1,914
Reaction score
178
Hello,

I have a question if this makes any sense.

Say your tax rate is 5%. If you contribute $1000 to SRS, you save $50 in tax on the contributed amount.

If you do nothing and the $1000 remains static at retirement, (ignoring inflation/interest etc.), you get $1000 out - $500 tax free and $500 taxable. Assuming your tax rate by then 0%, you pay $0 in tax. So you saved $50.

Would this then mean that if you invest the $1000 in SRS, even if you lose 5% of the principal, you are in the same position as if you never contributed? Because if you didn't contribute, you would have paid $50, and have $950 left. So there is a already a 5% buffer in case your investment goes bad?
 

limster

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Oct 31, 2000
Messages
13,106
Reaction score
4,077
If you do nothing and the $1000 remains static at retirement, (ignoring inflation/interest etc.), you get $1000 out - $500 tax free and $500 taxable. Assuming your tax rate by then 0%, you pay $0 in tax. So you saved $50.

In a sense you save $50 in return for a 20, 30 year 'lock-in' period.

I only opened an SRS account after my income hit a certain level.
 

Utonian

Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2012
Messages
234
Reaction score
29
i think this is not comparing things on the same level..

you are right to say you save $50 on the first year due to tax... and you would be right if you let the 1000 sit idle till you draw down at 0% tax level.. But who would do this....

in the alternate mentioned where you invest the funds, once you are invested, everything is subjected to market forces.. I cannot foresee someone saying i have lost the $50 "tax gain" so i shall liquidate the investment and hold on the $950 for the rest of the period till drawdown and say i lost nothing in principal...
 

epigram

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2000
Messages
1,914
Reaction score
178
What I'm trying to say is that if a sum is invested outside of SRS, you would start from a -22% position which you then have to work up from.

Whereas if a sum is invested within SRS, you start from a -11% to 0% position, recognising the trade off for the 11% safety net is a lock in for 30 to 40 years.

Does that make more sense? Thanks in advance
 

dork32

Supremacy Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2010
Messages
9,366
Reaction score
1,578
Hello,

I have a question if this makes any sense.

Say your tax rate is 5%. If you contribute $1000 to SRS, you save $50 in tax on the contributed amount.

If you do nothing and the $1000 remains static at retirement, (ignoring inflation/interest etc.), you get $1000 out - $500 tax free and $500 taxable. Assuming your tax rate by then 0%, you pay $0 in tax. So you saved $50.

Would this then mean that if you invest the $1000 in SRS, even if you lose 5% of the principal, you are in the same position as if you never contributed? Because if you didn't contribute, you would have paid $50, and have $950 left. So there is a already a 5% buffer in case your investment goes bad?

u made it sound like the tax saving is small and insignificant.

lets put it this way, let say i want to buy a single premium plan for 15 years today.

i buy with cash, i pay the full amount. i put inside srs then use srs to buy, i get the same thing, but i get to run tax. so why not?

you used 5% which belittles the savings. many of the srs people pay 7,11 or 15%
 

Okenba

Supremacy Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2012
Messages
5,324
Reaction score
996
What I'm trying to say is that if a sum is invested outside of SRS, you would start from a -22% position which you then have to work up from.

Whereas if a sum is invested within SRS, you start from a -11% to 0% position, recognising the trade off for the 11% safety net is a lock in for 30 to 40 years.

Does that make more sense? Thanks in advance

Yes. Basically, if you are in the 11% tax bracket, you can either:
A) Put 15.3k in SRS and invest from there.
B) Put (15,300 - 1,683 income tax) = 13,617 into investments.

Essentially, SRS gives you an immediate 11%+ gain.
The trade-off, as you mentioned, is liquidity, and also the restrictions of investments for SRS.
 

Laneige

Honorary Member
Joined
Dec 21, 2009
Messages
114,958
Reaction score
16,712
Camp in because I was told to put money in so I just blur blur put in
Now can do what? I think I put in 11k or something
 

epigram

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2000
Messages
1,914
Reaction score
178
Yes. Basically, if you are in the 11% tax bracket, you can either:
A) Put 15.3k in SRS and invest from there.
B) Put (15,300 - 1,683 income tax) = 13,617 into investments.

Essentially, SRS gives you an immediate 11%+ gain.
The trade-off, as you mentioned, is liquidity, and also the restrictions of investments for SRS.

that's what i thought. the tax savings is the "gain" on the investment - which serves as a safety in case the investment goes south. if the loss on the investment is less than the tax savings, then you are still ahead - subject to the loss of liquidity / restrictions, etc.
 

twinklingstars

Supremacy Member
Joined
Aug 2, 2006
Messages
6,442
Reaction score
839
I only put in a dollar to lock in the withdrawal age first, will probably make use of SRS in my 40s when I hit the next income tax bracket.
 

mcylo

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
May 3, 2000
Messages
22,122
Reaction score
7,820
Sorry noob here. How do u arrived at the magical number $15.3k?

Yes. Basically, if you are in the 11% tax bracket, you can either:
A) Put 15.3k in SRS and invest from there.
B) Put (15,300 - 1,683 income tax) = 13,617 into investments.

Essentially, SRS gives you an immediate 11%+ gain.
The trade-off, as you mentioned, is liquidity, and also the restrictions of investments for SRS.
 

chiokcc

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2005
Messages
13,368
Reaction score
1,539

epigram

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2000
Messages
1,914
Reaction score
178
I only put in a dollar to lock in the withdrawal age first, will probably make use of SRS in my 40s when I hit the next income tax bracket.

great tip to lock in retirement age, since it will move up in 2023. i just did the same - $1 to lock it in.
 
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ Forums. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts. Please refer to our Community Guidelines and Standards and Terms and Conditions for more information.
Top