Tesla stock

yang_nastyman

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2011
Messages
2,431
Reaction score
206
The upside based on the inclusion alone is not as huge as you might think. So yeah, the price will go up initially because of S&P500 funds buying in.

But remember on the other hand, other non-S&P500 funds that are heavy on TSLA or already have a decent weightage in it (ARK, QQQ, QCLN VUG, SMT, Baillie Gifford etc.) will need to sell and rebalance. This plus profit taking will drive the price down more than buying IMO.

The net change in price won't be that much when everything settles down. It's good news for TSLA all around, but nothing fundamentally changes and the smart money should already know this.

why do they have to sell tsla?
 

WC32890

Supremacy Member
Joined
May 11, 2017
Messages
9,871
Reaction score
4
The upside based on the inclusion alone is not as huge as you might think. So yeah, the price will go up initially because of S&P500 funds buying in.

But remember on the other hand, other non-S&P500 funds that are heavy on TSLA or already have a decent weightage in it (ARK, QQQ, QCLN VUG, SMT, Baillie Gifford etc.) will need to sell and rebalance. This plus profit taking will drive the price down more than buying IMO.

The net change in price won't be that much when everything settles down. It's good news for TSLA all around, but nothing fundamentally changes and the smart money should already know this.

I disagree. I think there are more funds out there esp passive funds that mirror the S&P and thus need to buy in Tesla than funds that are overweight on Tesla. Arkk is definately not going to sell out a significant exposure of their tesla holding. Most funds who owns Tesla won't. They are in it for the long term. There will be a bonus split coming soon if i am right.
 

reddevil0728

Great Supremacy Member
Joined
Dec 16, 2005
Messages
65,806
Reaction score
5,718
I disagree. I think there are more funds out there esp passive funds that mirror the S&P and thus need to buy in Tesla than funds that are overweight on Tesla. Arkk is definately not going to sell out a significant exposure of their tesla holding. Most funds who owns Tesla won't. They are in it for the long term. There will be a bonus split coming soon if i am right.
What’s a bonus split?
 
Joined
May 11, 2017
Messages
62,346
Reaction score
11,768
why do they have to sell tsla?

say tsla price is $100 at 10 shares and the ETF has 10% of this stok.
then tsla price is $200 and the 10 shares of the ETF will be $2,000 which likely would be a higher % assume other stocks have fixed qty and price.

So the ETF need to sell of some shares to balance it.
 

hatredhollow

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Jun 14, 2008
Messages
22,127
Reaction score
2,237
The upside based on the inclusion alone is not as huge as you might think. So yeah, the price will go up initially because of S&P500 funds buying in.

But remember on the other hand, other non-S&P500 funds that are heavy on TSLA or already have a decent weightage in it (ARK, QQQ, QCLN VUG, SMT, Baillie Gifford etc.) will need to sell and rebalance. This plus profit taking will drive the price down more than buying IMO.

The net change in price won't be that much when everything settles down. It's good news for TSLA all around, but nothing fundamentally changes and the smart money should already know this.

Profit taking yes
But they will buy back at new price shortly

So the new support no longer at 400-420

Tesla got alot fanatic support just like Apple
 

aurvandil

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 11, 2019
Messages
1,806
Reaction score
1,085
I disagree. I think there are more funds out there esp passive funds that mirror the S&P and thus need to buy in Tesla than funds that are overweight on Tesla. Arkk is definately not going to sell out a significant exposure of their tesla holding. Most funds who owns Tesla won't. They are in it for the long term. There will be a bonus split coming soon if i am right.

A large number of the funds which mirror the S&P do so via futures so there will be no need for outright Tesla stock purchases to mirror the S&P performance. Individual stock these days tend to be held by actively managed funds that seek to outperform the indices.
 

snowblaze

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2006
Messages
16,139
Reaction score
7,133
The upside based on the inclusion alone is not as huge as you might think. So yeah, the price will go up initially because of S&P500 funds buying in.

But remember on the other hand, other non-S&P500 funds that are heavy on TSLA or already have a decent weightage in it (ARK, QQQ, QCLN VUG, SMT, Baillie Gifford etc.) will need to sell and rebalance. This plus profit taking will drive the price down more than buying IMO.

The net change in price won't be that much when everything settles down. It's good news for TSLA all around, but nothing fundamentally changes and the smart money should already know this.

Hope could drop to $300+ so I could buy a few more shares.
 

hatredhollow

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Jun 14, 2008
Messages
22,127
Reaction score
2,237
what sleepless night? he went quite low right?
Under his 2.3m profit video he gt show his trading portfoilo
Lol his avg price is $40 for tesla and SQ

His tesla profit almost 2million
Unless tesla bankrupt elon musk die or stock spilt 10 for 1

I doubt we can buy tesla at $40 looool
 
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ Forums. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts. Please refer to our Community Guidelines and Standards and Terms and Conditions for more information.
Top