The AMD FX-9590 "FX Centurion" Preview

MacClipper

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2000
Messages
33,617
Reaction score
4
After weeks of waiting, it finally arrived...


CHVZ_CPU-ZCopy_zpsa3b5489a.png~original
 

MacClipper

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2000
Messages
33,617
Reaction score
4
jus curious, does "CPU" circled in blue refer to temp at the motherboard cpu socket? if yes, then shudn't the cpu itself also be in that range too (actually slightly higher)...? eg. maybe abt 70-75C instead of 49.4C.

Dug up again, info specific to the ROG Crosshair series

Undervolted_hwinfo64Copy_zps18b1faa7.png



And this is what it looks like for the FX-9590 after an hour of mainly web surfing and some Cinebench/WinRAR benching.

CHVFZ_hwinfo64StockCopy_zps0dcc37f7.png~original
 

MacClipper

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2000
Messages
33,617
Reaction score
4
Gist of above link for those too lazy to click...

AMD has validated the Crosshair V and Sabertooth 990FX as for use with its new FX 9590 and 9370 CPUs, however there is some advise we'd like to add for users upgrading (or even users running their FX-8350s at ~5GHz frequencies).

1) You MUST plug in the 8pin and 4pin CPU 12V power plugs: they are there for this kind of usage! A 5GHz FX CPU will certainly draw over the 300W limit on the 8pin cable. If your PSU has good OCT it will simply cut out and your system will suffer hard-reboots. If not, it will likely melt poorly constructed PSUs with cheap wiring under extensive stress, unless your PSU is specifically fitted with heavy-gauge (lower AUG rating) wiring.

2) Do not disable OCP if you're running 24/7, it will protect your CPU. If you're trying to run extreme voltage for benchmarking you will have to turn it off, but in that case we strongly recommend watercooling (or at least chilling) the VRMs.

3) As you'd expect, when pulling close to 400W the VRMs run hot. At a minimum active cooling from direct case airflow is therefore a must (and watch those temps). Still, we strongly recommend watercooling the VRMs (EK does a good block) and do NOT loop CPU into VRMs: create two loops. When you consider your loops take into account the heat you're trying to shift: we advise looking at >1 large radiators and/or even a chiller system is maybe worth considering if you're running several high-power items together.

HTH
 

bhtan83

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 4, 2011
Messages
1,554
Reaction score
0
but based on ur review the highest was 172W only.. unless its for the extreme OCing conditions.
 

MacClipper

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2000
Messages
33,617
Reaction score
4
Load Temps
Max load DTS very similar to the Extreme9 and here ROG CPU (T0) temps seem very close to DTS too


CHVFZ_xvid4PSP5GHzTurboUV_OKCopy_zps86053b7c.png~original
 

hlots123

Supremacy Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2006
Messages
5,207
Reaction score
11
thx for the follow-up, mac :)
yah the temp readings with the asus board is easier to make sense of :)

side qn, any ideas why despite the low load temp, how come amd specs for max temps (when stated) are usually much lower than intel's? i thot silicon wafer tech shud be abt same for similar generation whether amd or intel wrt silicon/circuit degradation...

and the working range for the amd cpu package sensor (only valid above 40c?) seems so narrow.
 

MacClipper

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2000
Messages
33,617
Reaction score
4
Cannot compare like that cos quite different designs and platforms mah...
 

MacClipper

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2000
Messages
33,617
Reaction score
4
HWBot Prime
Bumped up scores from 6653 to ~6663 with lower latency 1866C8 RAM


Old score

HWBotPrime_5GHz_6653_Copy_.PNG




New score

CHVFZ_HWBotPrime5GHz_1866C8_6663Copy_zps42033567.jpg~original



Nice! :)
 

MacClipper

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2000
Messages
33,617
Reaction score
4
Running RAM at 2133C9 didn't achieve any higher scores. So yeah, I think that's a pretty decent score improvement.

btw, don't expect any single socketed Intel rig to come close to this score even for the enthusiast LGA2011 platform, much less the mainstream 1150/1155 rigs. :)
 

Gattberserk

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Jan 26, 2008
Messages
10,660
Reaction score
932
Running RAM at 2133C9 didn't achieve any higher scores. So yeah, I think that's a pretty decent score improvement.

btw, don't expect any single socketed Intel rig to come close to this score even for the enthusiast LGA2011 platform, much less the mainstream 1150/1155 rigs. :)

So the FX5950 is faster than any Intel consumer CPU in this aspect?
 

MacClipper

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2000
Messages
33,617
Reaction score
4
That's what I had read.

Gattberserk, how about posting your 3770K @ 4.4GHz score to see if it is true? Thx.
 

MacClipper

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2000
Messages
33,617
Reaction score
4
Memory Bandwidth Scaling
FX-9590 on Crosshair V Formula-Z 1304


Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3-2133, "Intel RAM"
- Samsung SS memory
AIDA64_ComparedVen2133Copy_zpse49ac778.jpg~original



Team Elite DDR3-1600
- PSC DS memory
AIDA64_ComparedPSCCopy_zpsd1687279.jpg~original



HTH
 

haylui

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Jul 18, 2006
Messages
29,763
Reaction score
91
MacClipper, any chance you disclose your detailed system spec for running the benchmarks?
 

MacClipper

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2000
Messages
33,617
Reaction score
4
hi haylui, almost exactly the same setup as earlier posted in #2 except for the components being tested.

OK, will just repeat it here


AMD FX-9590@5GHz | Crosshair V Formula-Z | NiCu HK 3.0-GTX360 | HIS HD7950 IceQ X²@stock | Enermax Platimax 1200W ★


RAM timings used in each test can be read from the AIDA64 screenshot itself.


HTH
 

haylui

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Jul 18, 2006
Messages
29,763
Reaction score
91
hi haylui, almost exactly the same setup as earlier posted in #2 except for the components being tested.

OK, will just repeat it here


AMD FX-9590@5GHz | Crosshair V Formula-Z | NiCu HK 3.0-GTX360 | HIS HD7950 IceQ X²@stock | Enermax Platimax 1200W ★


RAM timings used in each test can be read from the AIDA64 screenshot itself.


HTH

thanks for the details system spec.

From AMD FX-9590 Review; Piledriver at 5GHz - Page 17

they shows 248W of total power consumption (measure from AC supply).
Could you run the similar test to see if their chip and your chip deviate?
 

MacClipper

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2000
Messages
33,617
Reaction score
4
If you take into consideration the many differences in the test configs, think you may be able to account for the ~70W gap

Difference...
AC voltages - 240V vs 120V
Mobos - Extreme9 vs Sabertooth
VGA - HD7950 vs GTX670
PSU - Platinum 1200W vs Gold 850W
Vcore - undervolted vs stock
APM - active vs ?
Windows Power Plan - Balanced vs Performance
Cooling - custom water vs air
Measurement - direct watt meter vs Tripp-Lite 1800W line conditioner
Load test - P95 Blend vs wPrime
etc...

Again, note that it's 248W for their whole rig off the wall vs the official 220W TDP just for the CPU alone.
 
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts.

Please refer to our Community Guidelines and Standards, Terms of Service and Member T&Cs for more information.
Top