The Watch Thread - Part 13

Status
Not open for further replies.

ah_leetw

Master Member
Joined
Aug 10, 2000
Messages
2,983
Reaction score
19
Last edited:

info_guy

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Mar 25, 2004
Messages
17,420
Reaction score
1,465
I personally don't like the change too. For me e old format of Seiko and GS is better.

Nice AP from coern and pwillie there.
 

delrosa81

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2005
Messages
1,073
Reaction score
0
TGIF again!

pwNOvta.jpg
 

cichlid

Master Member
Joined
Oct 28, 2004
Messages
2,961
Reaction score
1,068
Breitling-Chronoliner-B04-Breitling-Chronomat-44-Boutique-Edition-Blue-aBlogtoWatch-1.jpg


Breitling Chronoliner B04 & Chronomat 44 Boutique Edition Watches

Like the blue and beige combo.
 

Ed.YEO

Banned
Joined
Oct 1, 2015
Messages
8,713
Reaction score
0
20170616_98b418ebfeed9c410a2a29lYbyZ1YrIq.jpg

终於。。。又一個禮拜啦!
當然唔得忘記依幾日伴住我,嘅花花喽
20170616_d56ed2c8f0242988b9e1ujjhOn9lZhWF.jpg


20170616_1d52bd35c7eb6037ae07y3NEQPE4iuFz.jpg


20170616_1bd77dcfcc0ad23caec5JdjfoDvwJLtx.jpg


20170616_06fc2345af53620b726au9Q6FPgLY6q2.jpg

:D :D :D
 

Henabi

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2004
Messages
32,164
Reaction score
762
I personally don't like the change too. For me e old format of Seiko and GS is better.

Nice AP from coern and pwillie there.

Yes, they did. They have announced that GS is not part under Seiko which is why SEIKO has be removed. Is part of their marketing purpose.

But personally I dont like the new logo. :(

http://www.ablogtowatch.com/grand-seiko-becomes-autonomous-brand-2017/

Well... one man's meat is another man's poison

Taking away the big wording SEIKO and keeping only "GS Grand Seiko" does make the watch dial less cluttered and sporting a cleaner look, which could probably pave the way for a Grand Seiko Tourbillon?!

Since Seiko already achieved that feat with credor last year

Personally... i feel that removing the big word SEIKO completely and pushing Grand Seiko to a more prominent position on the watch dial will do more good than harm, in terms of the general brand awareness. Because most people who own GS are really watch lovers and they know what they are investing in but with the SEIKO wording, it doesn't appeal to the mainstream public.

I always get rejection from my wife to pull the trigger on a SEIKO Grand Seiko watch.

Her exact reaction: "You siao ah! 4/5K on a Seiko!!! Might as well put the money with me..."

Not sure about others here but I feel that with the big word SEIKO now gone starting from their current new collections. I may get lesser resistance from my wife if I wanna pull the trigger on GS (less SEIKO)
 
Last edited:

cokiee

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 6, 2012
Messages
1,158
Reaction score
0
My thoughts are similar, in that the aim is to establish Grand Seiko as a distinct brand under the Seiko company, not just as an offshoot of the Seiko line (f.e.x Presage, Prospex). This then leaves the way for more distinct pricing - possibly allowing GS to reach Credor prices since they're technically not within the same hierarchy.

Sent from Xiaomi MI MAX using GAGT
 

rachdanon

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Mar 19, 2007
Messages
18,222
Reaction score
5,203
Never thought I would get one.
Roman numerals, enamel dial, low entry price.....almost the perfect dress watch. Can't bear to pay 30k for a swiss dress watch - would like some complications for that kind of price.

Just some things I don't like. The date window outline, and the thickness of it. And.....would still like a rose gold dress watch.
14B70E32-0175-45B2-A04E-6FA4EEFDDB96_zps1kgnbidt.jpg

I might have the solution for you - Zenith Elite Ultra Thin
- value for money relatively lower price (used can get even cheaper)
- 9mm thick
- Zenith movement see-through case back
- min 50 hr power reserve

18.2290.679_01.C498_image_standard.jpg


03.2290.679_11.C493_image_standard.jpg


Some chrono24 listings to give price indication : http://www.chrono24.sg/zenith/elite-ultra-thin--mod1330.htm?query=zenith+elite+ultra+thin
 

ashcrow

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Sep 6, 2005
Messages
14,849
Reaction score
25
guys. i recently got a rolex explorer 114270. 10/10 exterior. i asked the seller how's time keeping. he says the time keeping is good. anyway..it's bad when i took it home. :( it's +20s per day.

i went to top hour in hope to regulate the timing. mr lim oiled it. now it's +10s per day. i think it's in need of an overhaul.

rsc quoted $920. 5 weeks downtime. there's no service record for my watch.

should i go ahead with rsc? the watch has never been serviced before. btw it's a 2005 watch. or...3rd party can do an equally good job at a fraction (300-500) of the price? +2/-2 sec per day standard?

which is a better option for me? :o
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ Forums. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts. Please refer to our Community Guidelines and Standards and Terms and Conditions for more information.
Top