This is from tplink. Tech reply
MLO is still a gimmick feature, and the trouble it brings is far more troublesome than the insignificant gain.
If you want high bandwidth, 6G 320Mhz is almost enough for everything, so do the low latency.
Combine 6G and 5G is a good option, but no client support that because they do not designed to have separate 5G and 6G antenna and FEM in the client side.
That means most of the WiFi7 client which claim support MLO, they only support to combine 2G with 5G or 6G.
2G is a **** in the physical level due to high interference and low speed, add a **** to the faster WiFi channel won't make everything better, it will only make it worse.
Like if the 5G jumps back from DFS channel to NON-DFS one, the 2.4G will be the only option in the MLO connection, what if your client want to get a high speed and low latency network, but connect to the 2.4G as main channel there? It will be a disaster...
Thanks a lot for your valued feedback and understanding~
MLO is still a gimmick feature, and the trouble it brings is far more troublesome than the insignificant gain.
If you want high bandwidth, 6G 320Mhz is almost enough for everything, so do the low latency.
Combine 6G and 5G is a good option, but no client support that because they do not designed to have separate 5G and 6G antenna and FEM in the client side.
That means most of the WiFi7 client which claim support MLO, they only support to combine 2G with 5G or 6G.
2G is a **** in the physical level due to high interference and low speed, add a **** to the faster WiFi channel won't make everything better, it will only make it worse.
Like if the 5G jumps back from DFS channel to NON-DFS one, the 2.4G will be the only option in the MLO connection, what if your client want to get a high speed and low latency network, but connect to the 2.4G as main channel there? It will be a disaster...
Thanks a lot for your valued feedback and understanding~