Can Or Not
Arch-Supremacy Member
- Joined
- Jul 15, 2024
- Messages
- 17,916
- Reaction score
- 7,844
Tesla PE ratio is 156… 
So Trump says.So he wanted to have a EV mandate?
Lol...
EV mandate everyone to have EV and having EV subsidies are different matter? He can pass the cost to consumers...So Trump says.
But Musk says he's ok without the EV subsidies but wants all the fatty pork gone from the bill!
EV mandate everyone to have EV and having EV subsidies are different matter? He can pass the cost to consumers...
It's like mandate everyone must jab and jab with subsidies... :/
What is fatty pork?
The statement pasted says Trump championed Musk opposed...Same thing:
"The ‘EV mandate’ referenced by President Donald Trump and Elon Musk pertains to provisions in a tax bill passed by the House in May 2025, which Trump has championed and Musk has publicly opposed.
The bill takes a shot at EV tax credit. Section 112002 on page 30 of the One Big, Beautiful Bill document is titled ‘Termination of clean vehicle credit’. The credit was set to expire in December 2032, but a provision now ‘accelerates the expiration to December 31, 2025’. Americans would lose the ability to claim the EV tax credit in 2026, a big hit to Musk-owned Tesla."
Not like vaccine mandate.
Musk called all the unnecessary, budget-ballooning provisions in the bill PORK:
"This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination."
The statement pasted says Trump championed Musk opposed...
But the one Trump saying is Musk wanted and he himself is opposing... how same?
I think you'd better re-read - in effect, the Big Beautiful proposes to remove the EV credits (so-called mandate). Trump claims Musk opposes this but Musk has (within the last 24hrs) tweeted that he doesn't mind it gone as long as other PORK bits are also gone.
Aiyah both also flip-flopped like Japanese slippers so who to believe?
Meaning Trump statement about "forced everyone to buy" is false lah? It's more like if buy EV can get some subsidies, which make it more attractive and tempting to buy and not being forced.
Because Trump & co see it as a Dem initiative. He is more supportive of Big Oil (drill baby drill) and ICE tech.Meaning Trump statement about "forced everyone to buy" is false lah? It's more like if buy EV can get some subsidies, which make it more attractive and tempting to buy and not being forced.
Why would they want to cut the EV subsidies totally away though... cuz will hurt petroleum and oil companies? US overstock too much on petroleum and oil?
i work out like incredible hulk 1st then can 翻桌Sure is 翻书, and not 翻桌?