Wait for Haswell or get a 3570 instead?

vkvkvvk

Master Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2003
Messages
3,577
Reaction score
7
Hi guys, I'm in a bit of a dilemma here.
My main pc is using sabertooth z77 + 3770 non k [bought the non k, cause that time i needed urgently and k was not out in sim lim yet but did OC to 4.1ghz through multiplier only]
My HTPC pc is using amd 965 + mATX msi mobo and 660 ti.

Plan to change the HTPC to 3570 end of next month but haswell is coming out very soon.

Should I transfer my 3770 to the HTPC pc, sell my sabertooth mobo z77 and get a mATX for my HTPC then get a new haswell combo for my main pc?
or
Should I just keep my main pc as it is and get a 4670 haswell + mobo for my HTPC when it comes out.
or
I should just get a 3570 + mobo for my HTPC
 

watzup_ken

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Nov 21, 2003
Messages
25,671
Reaction score
2,122
Personally, I don't think you even need a quad core chip for HTPC. From your past HTPC specs, sounds like a gaming rig to me.

If you are not in a hurry, can always wait till Haswell. I doubt it will be that great, and since you are running an external graphic already, it should not add much value.
 

MoneyFace =p

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Dec 17, 2010
Messages
35,375
Reaction score
401
Personally, I don't think you even need a quad core chip for HTPC. From your past HTPC specs, sounds like a gaming rig to me.

If you are not in a hurry, can always wait till Haswell. I doubt it will be that great, and since you are running an external graphic already, it should not add much value.
He could be doing H.264 encoding with his HTPC. HTPC can be meant for simply video viewing to encoding and archival.
 

vkvkvvk

Master Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2003
Messages
3,577
Reaction score
7
He could be doing H.264 encoding with his HTPC. HTPC can be meant for simply video viewing to encoding and archival.

I do use my HTPC for gaming too

Personally, I don't think you even need a quad core chip for HTPC. From your past HTPC specs, sounds like a gaming rig to me.

If you are not in a hurry, can always wait till Haswell. I doubt it will be that great, and since you are running an external graphic already, it should not add much value.

I dont plan to upgrade my htpc for a long time and Haswell is considered a tick version of intel's development cycle.

If 3770 is installed on my HTPC it should last for a very long time. Just that not sure which plan should I go for as mentioned on my opening thread
 

MoneyFace =p

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Dec 17, 2010
Messages
35,375
Reaction score
401
I do use my HTPC for gaming too



I dont plan to upgrade my htpc for a long time and Haswell is considered a tick version of intel's development cycle.

If 3770 is installed on my HTPC it should last for a very long time. Just that not sure which plan should I go for as mentioned on my opening thread
Haswell will just be an upgrade like Sandy Bridge is to Ivy Bridge in performance though, that is to say either option will be fine. But if you are keen on doing unlimited OCing with K series CPU you should probably hold it out for Haswell.
 

RobinTeoHood

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Oct 1, 2010
Messages
14,628
Reaction score
2
Your current setup seems fine for whatever you want to do. Maybe save your money for something else.
 

a562140

Supremacy Member
Joined
Mar 12, 2004
Messages
6,412
Reaction score
3
wait for more detailed testing on haswell?
i'd think newer processors use less power and generate less heat - could be very useful in itx setup.
 

micheloving

Supremacy Member
Joined
Feb 21, 2009
Messages
7,357
Reaction score
1
Hard to say ...lets just hope that intel dun cheap out the thermal paste again.But new feature of the mb chipset not really revealed yet so better wait.
 

MoneyFace =p

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Dec 17, 2010
Messages
35,375
Reaction score
401
Hard to say ...lets just hope that intel dun cheap out the thermal paste again.But new feature of the mb chipset not really revealed yet so better wait.
Already revealed to have all 6 SATA III 6.0 Gbps ports and 6 USB 3.0 ports.
 

MoneyFace =p

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Dec 17, 2010
Messages
35,375
Reaction score
401
wait for more detailed testing on haswell?
i'd think newer processors use less power and generate less heat - could be very useful in itx setup.
Intel only have said to focus on reducing idle power consumption immensely (by 10x, unbelieveably cynical :s22:). Load power consumption should also see some reduction but you should keep your expectations low. However, you can root out for Haswell CPU (just a possibility) to return to fluxless solder for much better overclockability (and hence lower temp) over Ivy Bridge CPUs. (which is why i mention about better OC capability on my previous post)
 

coyote

Greater Supremacy Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2000
Messages
84,596
Reaction score
28,379
I agree that there is no place for a quad core in HTPC. Whether Sandy bridge, Ivy bridge whatever, they are all super cool to be put into itx chassis. So... an even cooler Haswell adds little value & certainly does not justify the premium charged to early adopters.

Even if you seriously wants some video encoding... your current quad cores are more than overkill... didn't Intel HD4000 can do some gpu encoding also?

Really no point to wait for Haswell. In fact, what is the point of upgrading actually when your current pcs are overkill?

Personally, I don't think you even need a quad core chip for HTPC. From your past HTPC specs, sounds like a gaming rig to me.

If you are not in a hurry, can always wait till Haswell. I doubt it will be that great, and since you are running an external graphic already, it should not add much value.
 

MoneyFace =p

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Dec 17, 2010
Messages
35,375
Reaction score
401
I agree that there is no place for a quad core in HTPC. Whether Sandy bridge, Ivy bridge whatever, they are all super cool to be put into itx chassis. So... an even cooler Haswell adds little value & certainly does not justify the premium charged to early adopters.

Even if you seriously wants some video encoding... your current quad cores are more than overkill... didn't Intel HD4000 can do some gpu encoding also?

Really no point to wait for Haswell. In fact, what is the point of upgrading actually when your current pcs are overkill?
What i can see from TS posts thus far is, he wants to retire his Deneb CPU in favour of Intel one (whichever IB or Haswell) for better gaming performance with the GTX 660 Ti on his HTPC, which you know is quite a significant upgrade with recently released games.
 

vkvkvvk

Master Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2003
Messages
3,577
Reaction score
7
What i can see from TS posts thus far is, he wants to retire his Deneb CPU in favour of Intel one (whichever IB or Haswell) for better gaming performance with the GTX 660 Ti on his HTPC, which you know is quite a significant upgrade with recently released games.

Yup, that's exactly why I am upgrading
 

escksu

Banned
Joined
Nov 24, 2011
Messages
8,391
Reaction score
3
Hard to say ...lets just hope that intel dun cheap out the thermal paste again.But new feature of the mb chipset not really revealed yet so better wait.

Seriously, I don't think its going to change.....

Both AMD and Intel has been using it for a long long time already. Since Haswell is supposedly to run cooler than IB, there is no need for solder bonding at all..

Actually, the thermal paste works fine unless you are overclocking. Hence, I don't know why Intel doesn't want to use solder for their K series instead, esp. since they are charging more.
 
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ Forums. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts. Please refer to our Community Guidelines and Standards and Terms and Conditions for more information.
Top