
I never said car buyers are idiots.why are these idiots buying car.
Also correct, but that's an excellent reason to put your first dollars (after emergency funds) into CPF OA, and to then, later on, hold your last dollars in other savings vehicles to accumulate the 5% cash component for your 20% down payment (for example).
....Do the math! It is correct. Compare a strategy of first dollars into CPF OA versus last dollars into CPF OA. The former approach gets you to your down payment faster, and with less cash required for your down payment. It's the simple power of higher and longer compound interest -- basic financial math here. CPF OA pays the highest rate, so if your goal is to save for housing -- and most people have that goal -- then that's exactly where your first dollars should go so they can "run" the longest. You want your 15% CPF OA dollars to run the marathon, and you want your 5% cash downpayment component to run a sprint, relatively speaking. Do the reverse and you're poorer -- you've lost interest earning power.
All after paying off interest-bearing debt and setting aside enough emergency funds -- and the latter could potentially be via proxy (i.e. a family member).
All after paying off interest-bearing debt and setting aside enough emergency funds -- and the latter could potentially be via proxy (i.e. a family member).
I never said car buyers are idiots.
Is buying a 40 meter yacht financially sensible? No, it's not. (With extremely rare, esoteric exceptions.) It's a luxury, and many people like luxuries. All I said is that buying a private automobile in Singapore is financially idiotic. So are many other ways people spend money, such as drinking a $500 glass of whiskey. If you can afford it, there's nothing wrong with that! Financial idiocy can be great fun.
I was sharing a hotel shuttle once a few years ago with some workers, and they observed me using a particular expensive object. One of them asked, "Does that help your business? Do you make more money that way?" (Paraphrasing, but that was the gist of his questions.) My honest answer: "Oh hell no. But I enjoy it." Well, some people "enjoy" sitting inside a hunk of highly taxed metal, the risk of psychological and/or financial ruin for running over a pedestrian, waiting in traffic, and the other "joys" of driving. And if that's how they want to spend their money, I have no objection.
....And if you want more cash to pay for luxuries, then you'll need to be a lot smarter about how you exploit the financial opportunities you have available, including CPF's extraordinary yields. If you need to save less money for housing because you took maximum advantage of CPF, you get to spend more money on luxuries.
I'm 18 and studying second year in poly , just received 1.4k bursary, what would be the best use of this money?
Nobody suggested putting every $1K of savings into CPF. (The government won't let you do that even if you wanted to, at least once you reach a certain income level. CPF contributions are capped to an annual limit, currently $37,740.) Please go back and re-read what I wrote. It's very clear.it is the aspiration of every young sg kids to own a car. if you are going to put every 1k into the cpf, you will never get your car.
Some contributions to CPF are compulsory, and you have to make those contributions even if you have lots of high cost debts. That's not the original poster's situation. MediShield Life premiums are also compulsory.this statement is also not exactly correct. eg, i have an interest bearing debt, my home loan, still running. i still put my money into cpf. but for every dollar i put into cpf, i have another five available in liquid assets.
Everybody has emphasized the need to take care of (a) emergency funds; (b) paying off high cost debt; and (c) prudent educational investment needs (textbooks, etc.) first. There's no confusion on that point, and it's not complicated.I think this discussion is derailing like as though TS is asking a super complicated question.
I'm 18 and studying second year in poly , just received 1.4k bursary, what would be the best use of this money?
Nobody suggested putting every $1K of savings into CPF. (The government won't let you do that even if you wanted to, at least once you reach a certain income level. CPF contributions are capped to an annual limit, currently $37,740.) Please go back and re-read what I wrote. It's very clear.
If you don't understand how to maximize the financial opportunities you have, including CPF, then you're never going to get all (or any of) the luxuries you want. Those who understand (and understood) how to maximize and optimize CPF have prospered.
Do we have a forum full of people who make money on sales commissions in the private financial sector? I'm beginning to wonder! There's nothing wrong with that, but there's really no justification for this irrational criticism of CPF. CPF is a powerful tool to help you achieve your financial goals. I recommend maximizing every financial opportunity.
Some contributions to CPF are compulsory, and you have to make those contributions even if you have lots of high cost debts. That's not the original poster's situation. MediShield Life premiums are also compulsory.
Also, occasionally it's possible to have a debt that either does not accrue interest or that carries a lower interest rate than the return you can get on savings. In such rare cases it makes sense to maintain that debt or even to add to it. For example, in the U.S. it's often possible for university students to take out federally guaranteed student loans even if they don't need the money. Those loans do not start to accrue interest until 6 months after leaving university. In that case, it's wise to borrow the money (up to the maximum limit) and put it into a savings vehicle with zero or very low principal risk, then pay off the loan in full just before interest starts to accrue. Students (and their parents) who can pull off that financial maneuver -- and there are some -- end up pocketing the interest and dividends thanks to the U.S. federal government's generosity. Not bad! If a government or anybody else wants to be so generous my advice is to take the deal and enjoy the free ride.
As that example demonstrates, there's nothing wrong with debt per se. If the debt is incurred in order to fund a true investment, with a high likelihood of success, then that's terrific. (That U.S. federal student loan example is one such case.) Going into debt to finance a NUS or Harvard or Oxford education is probably a very good idea, to pick another example. Going into debt to fund a casino gambling habit, not so much.
If TS has to ask what to do with 1. 4k, there is a good chance that 1. 4k is all he has.
If he has 20k already, he wouldn't be asking what to do with 1. 4k.
Nobody suggested putting every $1K of savings into CPF. (The government won't let you do that even if you wanted to, at least once you reach a certain income level. CPF contributions are capped to an annual limit, currently $37,740.) Please go back and re-read what I wrote. It's very clear.
If you don't understand how to maximize the financial opportunities you have, including CPF, then you're never going to get all (or any of) the luxuries you want. Those who understand (and understood) how to maximize and optimize CPF have prospered.
Do we have a forum full of people who make money on sales commissions in the private financial sector? I'm beginning to wonder! There's nothing wrong with that, but there's really no justification for this irrational criticism of CPF. CPF is a powerful tool to help you achieve your financial goals. I recommend maximizing every financial opportunity.
Now bursary got some much?