DestinyFate
Supremacy Member
- Joined
- Mar 31, 2006
- Messages
- 5,977
- Reaction score
- 7
As topic above..

terraj said:The basic plan itself is competitive but the rider for the PruShield is VERY VERY expensive unfortunately. Income is somewhere in the middle @ 100+. Aviva's rider is very reasonable, only 50 bucks for my age group. So I think Aviva has the best overall plan.
But because of a previous medical condition which Aviva would not cover but NTUC did, I took up the NTUC as charged + rider in the end.


go any NTUC fairprice and tell the cashier u want to buy insurance..****zbuster said:where to apply incomeshield?
onizuka_eiji said:go any NTUC fairprice and tell the cashier u want to buy insurance..

FYI, to make a hospitalisation claims for income shield, you need to inform or call up the hospital 4 DAYS in ADVANCE, so that you need not fork out any sum on your own upfront, other than the deductibles. If not, the claim will take about 2-3 months to process, if this processing speed do not sounds absurd, then perhaps this might be a popular choice for some people. In situations like car accidents or sudden heart attack, I do not see how this shield is going to help much when one bought an insurance and yet has to pay the money upfront while waiting for the claim to be made.arianwen said:well, anyone who still try to put incomeshield down because of the claims processing speed is absurd when all the medical plans are integrated now and also, income has significantly reduced claims processing time.
You may wanna refer to MOH website for some statistics, plus incomeshield is the only plan currently in the market which offers a letter of guarantee.
Read up more before making any decisions.
Agent_Jerry said:FYI, to make a hospitalisation claims for income shield, you need to inform or call up the hospital 4 DAYS in ADVANCE, so that you need not fork out any sum on your own upfront, other than the deductibles. If not, the claim will take about 2-3 months to process, if this processing speed do not sounds absurd, then perhaps this might be a popular choice for some people. In situations like car accidents or sudden heart attack, I do not see how this shield is going to help much when one bought an insurance and yet has to pay the money upfront while waiting for the claim to be made.
For AIA, prudential, GE, i have never heard of such things as 4 days notice.
We should really read up more before making any decisions.
Agent_Jerry said:FYI, to make a hospitalisation claims for income shield, you need to inform or call up the hospital 4 DAYS in ADVANCE, so that you need not fork out any sum on your own upfront, other than the deductibles. If not, the claim will take about 2-3 months to process, if this processing speed do not sounds absurd, then perhaps this might be a popular choice for some people. In situations like car accidents or sudden heart attack, I do not see how this shield is going to help much when one bought an insurance and yet has to pay the money upfront while waiting for the claim to be made.
For AIA, prudential, GE, i have never heard of such things as 4 days notice.
We should really read up more before making any decisions.
VoodooKing said:Hi Agent Jerry,
The 4 days in advance is only for non-emergencies. And as limster pointed out, the claims process was slow before because of the computer records transition.
Even so, there's no point telling the client that NTUC pays 2-3 months later when there is NO money that will be returned to the client anyway. So we have to be ethical and accurate when saying things like these.
Anyway I will not comment much because I have to read the schedules of all the different policies first to see the price difference justification.
"18. PRIOR NOTIFICATION FOR NON-EMERGENCY CASES
Unless it is an emergency, you are to notify us at least 4 working days prior to
the admission of an Insured Person to a hospital. This is to seek our advice and
recommendation on the hospital admission and/or the entitlement to Benefits under
this Policy.
Where expenses are incurred without prior notification to us or contrary to our
advice and recommendation, we may proportionately reduce your claim to reflect
what would have been reasonably incurred, based on the professional opinion of
our physician and/or the entitlement to Benefits under this Policy. Where there
is a difference of opinion between our physician and your physician, the matter
will be referred to an independent party for adjudication."