Who to blame if SG does not have enough boys for NS?

Lemonpeach

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
May 12, 2020
Messages
14,379
Reaction score
8,326
I've always advocated NS for girls.

TFR is poor. Not all new citizens perform NS.

I learnt yesterday the gender of a baby is determined by man. Only man carry the chromosome that eventuate into a baby boy or baby girl.

If we do not have enough boys for NS, is our SG male genetic profile the issue? More girls are born than boys.

Perhaps we import better male profiles for mating with SG girls to produce baby boys?

Automation is not the only solution to alleviate manpower shortage.
 

congster2

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2007
Messages
12,033
Reaction score
4,734
I've always advocated NS for girls.

TFR is poor. Not all new citizens perform NS.

I learnt yesterday the gender of a baby is determined by man. Only man carry the chromosome that eventuate into a baby boy or baby girl.

If we do not have enough boys for NS, is our SG male genetic profile the issue? More girls are born than boys.

Perhaps we import better male profiles for mating with SG girls to produce baby boys?

Automation is not the only solution to alleviate manpower shortage.
It's ok. Future wars will be fought with technology. Drones and bots
 

stillgottheblues

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Dec 31, 2011
Messages
31,360
Reaction score
3,515
New citizens MUST do NS and if they are over 30, they take up clerical, admin roles to free up man power.

New citizens, and rich billionaire children to be posted in all vocation. No more I easy and slack role.
 

EDMW-Hates-Me

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2019
Messages
45,120
Reaction score
25,257
I'm not against NS for females and to answer your other question:

Most people are pretty normal and it's not practical to screen for that profile.

The easier way is to give more PRs /citizenships to those who are more likely to serve. There might be an uproar if people find out that the number of boys in a family increase your chance, so we might need to be more general like give more to families instead of older singles / childless couples.

Anyway, NS is not the only contribution we should focus on.
 
Last edited:

jiagong

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 8, 2021
Messages
1,942
Reaction score
1,453
Why talk about genes? This is a social issue and not something biological. If gene really got problem then the effect would've been noticed generations ago.
 

MyWill

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2016
Messages
27,955
Reaction score
7,735
PAP's tch and neh roh. They are the ones who inisited no ns for ladies, and reduced guys' ns from 2.5yr to 2yrs. This implied more than enough servicemen.
 

Lemonpeach

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
May 12, 2020
Messages
14,379
Reaction score
8,326
Why talk about genes? This is a social issue and not something biological. If gene really got problem then the effect would've been noticed generations ago.
It is biological. I didn't thought so until a conversation yesterday at a medical conference. The medical evidence is long established.

Just google "Father or mother determines gender of baby". You will have a long list of references.

It was a surprise to me actually.

Now, I understand why there is a huge market for crispr editing of gene.

For reference : https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8664916/

This is currently internationally disallowed.
 

Lance321

Supremacy Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2006
Messages
6,405
Reaction score
2,336
SG beta males for sucking at the dating game. SG entitled females for equally sucking, yet having sky high expectations.
 
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts.

Please refer to our Community Guidelines and Standards, Terms of Service and Member T&Cs for more information.
Top