Why 3 points for asking COD ?

[askxyz]

Hi mod/admin,

Please advise why I cannot ask about the COD? The period where he was being diagnosed is when he could have already received at least 2 mrna jabs. There is growing evidences (https://forums.hardwarezone.com.sg/...accination-weakens-the-immune-system.6910961/) that the jab could cause cancer. Why is it a nuisance to ask the possible causes of cancer? Kindly review and reverse out the infraction points. Thanks

You have received a warning for the following offending post:
March 2022 . meh meh ?

Your post (Law Society president Adrian Tan dies at 57 after battle with cancer) has resulted in a warning. Your account's access may be limited due to the total amount of warning points accumulated.

 

[Intrinion]

Speculating and attributing a person’s cause of death due to cancer linked to vaccinations is highly irresponsible and insensitive. Your post was reported by users who found it distasteful and removed on these grounds.

Warning considerations took into account your past warning records on spreading vaccine related misinformation on our platform.

 

[Intrinion]

I would also like to add on that a person’s physiological conditions differs from individual to individual. Correlation does not imply causation. The “sequence” of events was simply your assumption.

If you also take notice - in academic articles published, the language used is often may or could to indicate possibility.

Hardly terms that are definitive e.g. will are used.

 

[askxyz]

Speculating and attributing a person’s cause of death due to cancer linked to vaccinations is highly irresponsible and insensitive. Your post was reported by users who found it distasteful and removed on these grounds.

Warning considerations took into account your past warning records on spreading vaccine related misinformation on our platform.

You are just turning a normal discussion into speculation. Any discussion in EDMW can also become speculation. Any healthy hypothetical discussion can also become speculation. If you don't like it, it becomes speculation. If you like it, it is healthy discussion. LOL

All those past warning records , there is NO misinformation on spreading covid19 experimental jab. You can't even prove it but just follow the official narrative like you are an expert.

 

[Intrinion]

Publishing information from a far right activist group known for deceit / misinformation is not at all credible.

That aside, the use a recently departed person’s death as a way to propagate vaccination related agendas and speculation is highly distasteful.

Hope you would keep this in mind and exercise alittle sensitivity when you post in the future

 

[askxyz]

I would also like to add on that a person’s physiological conditions differs from individual to individual. Correlation does not imply causation. The “sequence” of events was simply your assumption.

If you also take notice - in academic articles published, the language used is often may or could to indicate possibility.

Hardly terms that are definitive e.g. will are used.

A forum exists to discuss as long as there is no offending language used.. A forum is not for the glass heart people. If you want to cater to certain people "needs" because they don't feel good about it, might as well close the forum down.

Academic articles are usually exploratory to suggest certain findings to further look into that area.
You would wonder why for an experimental mrna jab, gov and the big pharma used definitive words like is safe, is 100%, 80%, 60% effective, can prevent covid19 and hospitalization etc..

 

[Intrinion]

The period where he was being diagnosed is when he could have already received at least 2 mrna jabs.

This is speculative and unnecessary.

 

[Intrinion]

A forum exists to discuss as long as there is no offending language used.. A forum is not for the glass heart people. If you want to cater to certain people "needs" because they don't feel good about it, might as well close the forum down.

Academic articles are usually exploratory to suggest certain findings to further look into that area.
You would wonder why for an experimental mrna jab, gov and the big pharma used definitive words like is safe, is 100%, 80%, 60% effective, can prevent covid19 and hospitalization etc..

The forum is also here to prevent the propagation of misinformation.

You may opt to post “alternate truths” or conspiracies at other platforms of your choosing.