Why Lawrence bring up 1996?

XKiRaX

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2007
Messages
15,780
Reaction score
32
Was he hoping for a strong reaction from CSJ.. and the debate will lose its focus and opposition will look bad?

well.. CSJ is a changed man..

His face show that he has 饱经沧桑

CSJ's face at that moment was a face of a disappointed man who has sacrificed and endured so much. Sacrificed and endured so much to see someone who is supposed to be part of the new generation of leaders once again resort to old smear tactics.
 

icansing

Great Supremacy Member
Joined
Jul 18, 2010
Messages
50,532
Reaction score
4,990
denise phua is worst when she said pap is helping everyone with diff starting point to be at their best..her eyes were darting here n there n dun even dare make eye contact. why? simply cos she's telling a lie.

why nvr send them for body language course?sibeh rookie
 

waiken

Honorary Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2000
Messages
112,535
Reaction score
4,177
CSJ won the 'battle', LW self pwnz make himself look so stupid n childish

yes seeing the way he read the smearing part out from paper definitely put in by pappy script writer wif malicious intent
 
Last edited:

primera_p12

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2006
Messages
1,931
Reaction score
0
CSJ have written his thoughts on this encounter in FB.
"
I was quite surprised at Mr Lawrence Wong's outburst tonight during the CNA forum. It was a bolt out of the blue when he cited a matter that happened 20 years ago to continue the PAP's tactic of character-assassination.
His comment was not in keeping with the spirit and tone of the forum which, up until then, was a robust but civil debate on the issues of the day and the future of our country.
This happened despite the PAP's promises not to indulge in the destructive politics of old. When the programme was over, Mr Wong came up to me and we shook hands. Then he smiled and said, “You came prepared.”
I have repeatedly urged the PAP to refrain from such kind of politics, including Mr Chan Chun Sing who called me a political failure earlier this year, and focus on the issues that Singaporeans care about.
Apparently, however, our younger ministers are bent on continuing such a tactic – a tactic that does not sit well the voters. It is my sincere hope that for the sake of Singapore, the PAP will stop what it is trying to do and get back to having a constructive GE on how we can better the lives of our fellow citizens.
"

https://www.facebook.com/cheesoonju...79314173848/10154418515543849/?type=1&theater
 

badpapaya

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 21, 2012
Messages
1,106
Reaction score
133
denise phua is worst when she said pap is helping everyone with diff starting point to be at their best..her eyes were darting here n there n dun even dare make eye contact. why? simply cos she's telling a lie.

why nvr send them for body language course?sibeh rookie
Yup... i detected that her eyes were darting too.
It's quite clear why she reacted this manner... lol
For LW ..... i think he is out for character assassination which is low handed.

Sent from Samsung GT-I9505 using GAGT
 

Chris008

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Jun 10, 2012
Messages
12,183
Reaction score
2,275
But anyway joke is on him, because CSJ handled it pretty well. I think this would help convince some who are having trouble believing that CSJ is a changed man.
 

Ximple

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Apr 26, 2011
Messages
21,290
Reaction score
2,606
Instead of spending his alloted time to tell voters what concrete plans his party has for our next 5 years, he chose to spend it on character assassination of his opponent.

What does it tell you about their plans for your future?
 

Atb

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2000
Messages
1,903
Reaction score
50
Instead of spending his alloted time to tell voters what concrete plans his party has for our next 5 years, he chose to spend it on character assassination of his opponent.

What does it tell you about their plans for your future?

Pap has no other concrete plan then to import more people to boost GDP. That's why talk about oppo poor character, cmi, cannot trust, etc.
 

silver09

Supremacy Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2000
Messages
6,164
Reaction score
476
really low blow :s22:
want to talk about public record somemore :s13:
You noticed he emphasized the phrase "public record".

Because he wants it to be a buzzword in tomorrows print...

****ing pre-meditated ********...
 

TopGun

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2000
Messages
45,660
Reaction score
7,631
You noticed he emphasized the phrase "public record".

Because he wants it to be a buzzword in tomorrows print...

****ing pre-meditated ********...

It's a deliberate attempt on disassociation. I don't believe he meant every word he said.
 

cal127

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Feb 26, 2002
Messages
29,243
Reaction score
3,910
Instead of spending his alloted time to tell voters what concrete plans his party has for our next 5 years, he chose to spend it on character assassination of his opponent.

What does it tell you about their plans for your future?

Already did. Its called the population white paper. I dunno to be honest... but I can say for certain right now things are not good and not getting better if he choose to waste his remaining political capital on stupid nonsense in order to score brownie points that's costing him broader support. This will easily backfire on him.
 

webhoster

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 12, 2008
Messages
1,914
Reaction score
2
denise keep talking about the past and what they ARE ALREADY DOING over and over again. her eyes and body language damm gan chiong. LW appears cool with good composure but reply nonsense and basically beat around the bush and then no answers to the questions or gave answers which we already know and is looking for a change.

the personal attack was real, real dirty. can see is purposely one...slowly slowly bring the topic to character and shoot CSJ.
 

tomasulu

Banned
Joined
Sep 21, 2000
Messages
14,620
Reaction score
4,034
Yeah bad bad move by lw. More than anything csj needed sympathy points and lw handed to him in spades.
 
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ Forums. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts. Please refer to our Community Guidelines and Standards and Terms and Conditions for more information.
Top