Will Storage

[iduncheckmail]

hmmm ..... but if you are "okay" with them all equally.
Then a distribution via intestate law is suffice wat.

unless you say you like your silbings more than your spouse, then will them more.
But then you really should think of changing spouse.

 

[reddevil0728]

hmmm ..... but if you are "okay" with them all equally.
Then a distribution via intestate law is suffice wat.

unless you say you like your silbings more than your spouse, then will them more.
But then you really should think of changing spouse.

Again it’s not about liking more or less.

like in ur example is already flawed.

if you die leaving behind a spouse (no kids or parents) the spouse get 100%.

your siblings get 0%

 

[sohguanh]

actually unless you hate your siblings, children or parents, whats the point of will.
The intestate law is suficient.

Agree of the interstate law but in reality talk about monies different story. How many times we read or experience nearby incidents of no will then below ppl dispute. Strangely if the dead is no monies no disputes. So yes if one have monies better have will or faster use finish don't leave any then no disputes. Monies is the cause of disputes in most if not all cases.

 

[reddevil0728]

Agree of the interstate law but in reality talk about monies different story. How many times we read or experience nearby incidents of no will then below ppl dispute. Strangely if the dead is no monies no disputes. So yes if one have monies better have will or faster use finish don't leave any then no disputes. Monies is the cause of disputes in most if not all cases.

If there is no will, what’s there to dispute?

only a dispute when there are competing version of what’s the actual will

 

[iduncheckmail]

Again it’s not about liking more or less.

like in ur example is already flawed.

if you die leaving behind a spouse (no kids or parents) the spouse get 100%.

your siblings get 0%

And whats the problem with that ? assuming the person loves his wife.
And if the silings having money issues, the person should help out money wise before death.

If the siblings no money issues, then why are they disgruntled without any inherience ?

 

[iduncheckmail]

Agree of the interstate law but in reality talk about monies different story. How many times we read or experience nearby incidents of no will then below ppl dispute. Strangely if the dead is no monies no disputes. So yes if one have monies better have will or faster use finish don't leave any then no disputes. Monies is the cause of disputes in most if not all cases.

I understand in your example there could be "money face" people even in the topic of death in the family.

I am assuming , all are rational people.
If its not mine , why will i feel unhappy if i dont receive it?

 

[reddevil0728]

And whats the problem with that ? assuming the person loves his wife.

I never say there’s any problem? But that does not mean that person agrees with the split

And if the silings having money issues, the person should help out money wise before death.

making a will does not mean the person can’t help before death what?

give you a few examples.

1) what if the decease prefer to donate to charity because his survivors are wealthy enough don’t need the money? Imagine warren buffet being in Singapore?

2) if siblings got money issue before death maybe can help with some, but cause majority of the money lock up in a property where the deceased is living maybe cannot help much before death, but after death ok?

If the siblings no money issues, then why are they disgruntled without any inherience ?

You are looking at it from a very black and white angle, without looking at circumstances.

 

[reddevil0728]

I understand in your example there could be "money face" people even in the topic of death in the family.

I am assuming , all are rational people.
If its not mine , why will i feel unhappy if i dont receive it?

But are all ppl really rational??

 

[iduncheckmail]

But are all ppl really rational??

yes . correct.
So if any of the immdiate family is the irrational type, the person hates them enough to put them intentially in the will to exclude them.

 

[sohguanh]

I understand in your example there could be "money face" people even in the topic of death in the family.

I am assuming , all are rational people.
If its not mine , why will i feel unhappy if i dont receive it?

Becuz some family are traditional first son or first son son get largest share but ironically during the dead living times those help them most are the second or third. So logically when die more should give those who look after you more but some dead stubborn give most to first son. Worst give all to sons daughters zero. So if you are the ones look after get zero how you feel? Those do nothing got monies take?

Maybe you different but I feel unfair so that is why I smart why look after so much since in the end don't get returns? Let the first son go do the hard work. I don't need the dead monies as I earn my own keep. Not giving to my offsprings too at the moment.

 

[reddevil0728]

yes . correct.
So if any of the immdiate family is the irrational type, the person hates them enough to put them intentially in the will to exclude them.

What if all are rational, but you want to give to more people because those who are supposed to get is already wealthy enough?

 

[reddevil0728]

Becuz some family are traditional first son or first son son get largest share but ironically during the dead living times those help them most are the second or third. So logically when die more should give those who look after you more but some dead stubborn give most to first son. Worst give all to sons daughters zero. So if you are the ones look after get zero how you feel? Those do nothing got monies take?

Maybe you different but I feel unfair so that is why I smart why look after so much since in the end don't get returns? Let the first son go do the hard work. I don't need the dead monies as I earn my own keep. Not giving to my offsprings too at the moment.

I think that’s what poster is trying to say. Only need a will for your described situation.

if not don’t need

 

[qhong61]

Becuz some family are traditional first son or first son son get largest share but ironically during the dead living times those help them most are the second or third. So logically when die more should give those who look after you more but some dead stubborn give most to first son. Worst give all to sons daughters zero. So if you are the ones look after get zero how you feel? Those do nothing got monies take?

Maybe you different but I feel unfair so that is why I smart why look after so much since in the end don't get returns? Let the first son go do the hard work. I don't need the dead monies as I earn my own keep. Not giving to my offsprings too at the moment.

Smart?

 

[sohguanh]

I think that’s what poster is trying to say. Only need a will for your described situation.

if not don’t need

Actually will is when got monies or assets to distribute. If don't have no need will at all as nothing to distribute. So I plan already to use finish but I cannot predict the exact date I die so hard to plan the use finish date.

 

[iduncheckmail]

Becuz some family are traditional first son or first son son get largest share but ironically during the dead living times those help them most are the second or third. So logically when die more should give those who look after you more but some dead stubborn give most to first son. Worst give all to sons daughters zero. So if you are the ones look after get zero how you feel? Those do nothing got monies take?

Maybe you different but I feel unfair so that is why I smart why look after so much since in the end don't get returns? Let the first son go do the hard work. I don't need the dead monies as I earn my own keep. Not giving to my offsprings too at the moment.

Ah ok ok . i see i see.
But taking care of elderly is all shld take turns and do whatever is possible. Not coz of the payout then do mah.
I mean "by right" lah .

 

[sohguanh]

Smart?

Not smart? Do a lot get zero deal you want? Even our now miw want millions then can do work. I follow them

 

[iduncheckmail]

Actually will is when got monies or assets to distribute. If don't have no need will at all as nothing to distribute. So I plan already to use finish but I cannot predict the exact date I die so hard to plan the use finish date.

this one i have the same thinking as you.
Next time i want to plan a "use finish" date.

 

[sohguanh]

this one i have the same thinking as you.
Next time i want to plan a "use finish" date.

Actually there is a way to plan use finish but not for this forum. All the best in your plan. Hope to see each other in Mandai Crematorium in future.

 

[reddevil0728]

Actually will is when got monies or assets to distribute. If don't have no need will at all as nothing to distribute. So I plan already to use finish but I cannot predict the exact date I die so hard to plan the use finish date.

Yep. So if you can’t be sure when you will pass on and might still have assets and you have your described situation, should have a will

 

[reddevil0728]

Ah ok ok . i see i see.
But taking care of elderly is all shld take turns and do whatever is possible. Not coz of the payout then do mah.
I mean "by right" lah .

Ya lor but the world doesn’t operate in the by right way