Repost from Notebook Clinic as no feedback given 
"I'm very curious about the performance of the skylake core m. Also because it is priced nicely at under $900 for the upcoming CEE 2016. It is extremely light too which is an added bonus!
Usage wise, it would be used mainly for watching online videos, surfing the net, doing some excel work ie nothing too demanding.
There are many different views on the performance of core m but from my understanding, since it is still part of intel core series, the performance shouldn't deviate as much as intel atom or celeron?
Any user of core m series willing to share their feedback?
One downside would be the screen size at 11.6". It is small yet not that small considering it was designed for portability.
My first choice would be the yoga 900 but I simply can't justify spending above 2k for i7-6500U 2cores/4threads when there are much more powerful laptops equipped with the new i7-6700HQ 4cores/8threads processor going for less!"
"I'm very curious about the performance of the skylake core m. Also because it is priced nicely at under $900 for the upcoming CEE 2016. It is extremely light too which is an added bonus!
Usage wise, it would be used mainly for watching online videos, surfing the net, doing some excel work ie nothing too demanding.
There are many different views on the performance of core m but from my understanding, since it is still part of intel core series, the performance shouldn't deviate as much as intel atom or celeron?
Any user of core m series willing to share their feedback?
One downside would be the screen size at 11.6". It is small yet not that small considering it was designed for portability.
My first choice would be the yoga 900 but I simply can't justify spending above 2k for i7-6500U 2cores/4threads when there are much more powerful laptops equipped with the new i7-6700HQ 4cores/8threads processor going for less!"

