Hi ST, is it a good idea to cover China Market as well, such as ishares China large-cap (FXI)?
Thanks.
No.
You don’t want to overweight anything - stock, sector, country, whatever - unless you have a good reason for it. It makes sense to overweight Singapore, because you live there and you’re going to retire there (presumably); but you don’t have any reason to overweight China. You certainly don’t have any informational advantage over professional traders.
Separately: “But China is the future!” is a meme we get here about once a week. The problem is that that meme’s been doing the rounds since literally 2001. “China is the future” already happened: at this point, China is a well-established developing economy, that’s also struggling under the weight of a graying population and frankly hilarious bad debt problems in its banks and its local governments.
*newbie question,pardon me*
wah i was checking the price for IWDA at SCB. buy at $53 done at $60. $7 difference. that's a lot is it normal?
usually how you guys buy based on the above price?
I think you’ve got some dodgy data. The price for IWDA is $61.27 as of the London close.
Anyway, the right way to do it is to wait for the London stock exchange to open (in the afternoon Singapore time); look up the last-done price on Google Finance or wherever; then add like 1% to that price and put that as your limit price on your buy order. That’ll make sure you get done straight away.
It's nearing year-end and am looking to top up $15k into my SRS.
With the SRS funds, I'm thinking to just lump sum into MBH (I'm separately doing DCA for IWDA with cash).
Any potential pitfalls with this? Thanks!
If you've already got an allocation to ES3, then yeah, that seems fine.
Price of MBH is steadily increasing past few months. I wonder if this is normal/sustainable?
It's totally normal - especially for bonds and bond ETFs, where the price naturally ticks up as the bonds accrue interest.
Right, let's get something straight. I think the question you're trying to ask is "are constant injections of liquidity by central banks—aka 'quantitative easing'—causing stocks to become overvalued? And if so, should I avoid investing in stocks?".
The answer to both of those questions is "no".
Stocks around the world are not overvalued. There are certainly some markets that are expensive (lookin’ at you, India!), but the US—the one you seem to be asking about—is right in the middle of its long-term valuation range; and some markets (like Europe and EMs) look quite cheap, though that tends to be for structural reasons that might take a long time to work out.
And if the answer to the first question is “no”, the answer to the second question is “no” as well.
Ray Dalio announced that he's shorting it with a 1b usd fund.
He did not announce that.
The
Wall Street Journal published an article saying that Bridgewater had bought $1.5 billion of puts on the S&P 500 and the Eurostoxx 50 indices, and
Ray Dalio actually said that the Wall Street Journal report was wrong.
(I suspect the actual truth is that Bridgewater did buy a bunch of equity index puts, but that didn't make them short, it just made them "less long".)
2.1. what do you think of the 2008 till present QE?
do you think we would follow a similar trajectory just like what Japan did as they did their first national QE to save every japanese biz in the 90s' which resulted in an eventual bubble burst. They never really recovered from it and has gone through decades of deflation.
Who's "we"? I think you're confusing the US and Singapore.
Also you're getting Japanese economic history completely the wrong way around. The Japanese bubble burst at the end of 1989; the bank of Japan began purchasing assets
after the bubble burst.
And Japan's economic stagnation is due in very large part to demography: their population is shrinking and graying, and they're not particularly open to immigration, both of which are bad for the economy. The demographics of the US look absolutely nothing like Japan.
2.2. With all these liquidity, do you think this is the reason why we have the longest bull-run?
No. I think "the reason why we have the longest bull run"—again, assuming you're talking about US markets—is that the US economy has been growing slowly and stably ever since mid-2009. The 2010s are the first decade in American history where America didn't once fall into recession.
3. Do you think that we will run into the liquidity trap? So essentially, what is necessary is inflation and a sharp raise in interest rates instead of a flat, near-zero at the Fed side of things?
"A sharp rise in interest rates"? No, that's absolute lunacy.
Again, assuming you’re talking about the US economy, it’s doing relatively well: growth is steady and inflation is low. I suspect it could even grow a bit faster, and the Fed wouldn’t be at all mad to see higher wage growth and slightly higher inflation.
But a sharp rise in interest rates won’t help that—it would cripple it. The policy mix that the US needs right now is low interest rates (which they have), loose fiscal policy (which they have), and a meaningful passthrough to wages (which they don’t have).
Hi all, still trying to rebalance my portfolio. Despite reading the book, still not too sure how can I invest moving forward.
Currently, my portfolio consist of 100% G3B. Coming January, I would like to start on IWDA.
How should I allocate it accordingly?
Thanks
Don’t forget MBH as well. But all you need to do is buy IWDA and MBH each month instead of G3B, until you get to your target percentages.