Is there a way to calculate annual returns
rate for etf? Can't decide which bond etf to invest
You don't necessarily want to chase the absolute maximum returns; don't forget that bonds are supposed to be a stable component of your portfolio. MBH is a good compromise between returns and stability.
Hi all, very first post on HWZ forums although I have been reading quite a bit.
I'm looking to open an SRS account to get some tax break (although I'm still a little sketchy on locking up funds till retirement!) and use that funds to invest. I read that now it's better to buy SSB directly from the gov vs buying A35. So should I just use the SRS to fully purchase ES3?
Yeah, that works.
Another question I have is regarding treating CPF as the bond portion (should I put everything in SA for higher interest floor rates?).
Is that logic correct? Seems like quite a huge sum I would need to balance my portfolio if I treat CPF as the bond component.
This is also true, and that’s why I don’t make a call on whether or not people should include their CPF in their bond component. Ultimately, it’s whatever you feel comfortable with.
Another Q I have is whether there is a Irish domiciled ETF equivalent for RSP? What do you think about RSP vs SPY.
Equal-weighted ETFs are just an alternate way of getting exposure to the size factor (the hypothesis that small-cap stocks tend to outperform large-cap stocks). I think the size factor has been thoroughly mined, to be honest, so I’m not sure this still works well. I wouldn’t bother.
hi ST,
pls let me know your thoughts if this thought is correct in your view.
I realised that the daily upheavals of the market or economics-at-large are not an important factor to the stock prices, as stocks are linked to the biz growth of the company.
I have learnt to ignore the noise in the market/economy and focus on the company's growth potential and it's portfolio.
your thoughts, pls?
Uh, not quite. Economic growth does have an impact on stock prices, and so does general market sentiment. But these kick in over very long time frames; you're right to ignore the daily ups and downs and ups and downs of the markets.
Hi experts. Just starting this journey beginning this month. Intend to do 50% a35 and 50% iwda. Bond component will just use cpf to make it easy.
Err, do you mean ES3 instead of A35? A35 is a bond ETF.
My monthly fund fluctuates between 2k to 4k. Currently using SCB. Any better options to reduce cost? Thanks
Yeah, you can use Interactive Brokers to buy your IWDA, and you’ll save a fair bit of money with that transaction size.
I'm a SG citizen and Australian PR. A few years ago before I knew of Shiny Thing's book, I opened an Australian brokerage (CMC) account to DCA VAS, but never pulled the trigger.
Since Jan 19 after reading his book, I've been DCA-ing IWDA and STI using IB (Singapore account) 3k into each monthly.
Do you think it's worth for me to DCA VAS as well using CMC? Or should I just stick to IWDA + STI to keep it simple? I currently have about 400k in Australia banks just earning ~2.2-2.5% of interest and 150k in SG banks earning nothing
Thanks heaps!
Depends where you’re planning to retire. If you’re definitely going to retire in Singapore, there’s no need to own VAS / VAF; conversely, if you’re planning to retire in Australia, you wouldn’t need to own the STI.
Also I’d probably use a different brokerage? CMC is more of a spread-betting shop.
So I started the POSB Invest Saver and now am DCA into it.
Is it OK to keep it separate? Should I just feed the RSP and leave the previously bought ETFs as is? Or do I sell away the older ETFs?
Nah, you can leave them separate, no worries - as long as you’re not getting charged dividend or platform fees that are eating away at your old account.
For example, it is stated that ETF purchases on FSM is 0.08% and i do not see any recurring platform fee charges applicable for ETFs. Is there a fine print somewhere i missed out that adds to the cost of using the FSM platform?
Thank you in advance!
“…with a $10 minimum”, that’s the catch. Unless you’re doing hefty transaction sizes, FSM’s going to be the same price as Stanchart.
I came across another counter that looks interesting and think of adding EIMI that has emerging markets which will make my portfolio into
60% IWDA
20% EIMI
20% G3B
Will it be better or don't add EIMI better?
Don’t add. Even if you were to add EIMI to your portfolio, 20% is far too much - emerging markets make up less than 10% of global market cap.
Inverted yield curve is due to some economic phenomenon. Too complicated to explain here
Oh mate, come on. An inverted yield curve is not “too complicated to explain here”. It’s when short-term bond yields are higher than long-term bond yields, and that happens because people think the central bank is going to cut rates.
Inverted yield curves don’t cause recessions. They just say “the market thinks interest rates are going down”.
And this:
Next recession should be around in next 18-24 months period?
Whatever stock market rebounce now are probably dead cat bounce.
I definitely won't continue to DCA at current peak.
Coming economic recession may be a long drawn out one slowing dropping to bottom & recovery may be weak, hence DCA for long term may have little return to speak.
“Should”, “probably”, “may”, “may”, “may”, “may”. You’re making astrology look like an exact science.
Anyway, since you think the US market is going down: have you put your money where your mouth is and bought some 2-year puts on the S&P 500? You can buy December 2021 2900-strike puts for about 290 ticks; if the index drops to 2500 (which is only a 15% drop), you’ll make 30%.
Why would fear mongers come in now, when markets are like what 1 or 2% below ATH?
[…]
If you see the last 2 times when Fed was cutting rates this is what happened:
(Insert fear-mongering)
Hey Rev. I’ll be honest, you worry me a bit. I think you’ve talked yourself into a negative worldview and you’re just looking for reinforcement. You won’t find it here though.
Stocks go up and down, and there’s no guarantee that equity markets will always go up, obviously. But generally, betting on markets going down gives you a return curve like HSGFX’s, which has lost 50% of its value since inception
despite correctly calling the 2008 crash!.
The other thing is, like I’ve pointed out to Sugarbun: you’re talking about the US market, and acting as though the US is the entire world. But the US stock market:
* Is only about 25% of a well-diversified Singaporean investor’s position; and,
* Is full of companies that have earnings from, and exposure to, economies all over the world.
Both of those things mean that even if the US economy goes into recession, it won’t be the end of the world for a properly diversified portfolio.
And if US interest rates go down, it’ll be
good for the bond component of a portfolio, as people have seen during this recent little spew. If you really think the US economy is headed for the tank, the right trade is to be limit long 30-year Treasuries (or even 30-year zero-coupons, if you really want to put your money where your mouth is)
As BBCW correctly points out, if you think the US economy is overheated and primed for a fall, you should be super enthusiastic about European, Japanese, and Australian stocks, because their economies are on the lows at the moment and primed for an upswing.
But really, the thing you’re missing is that the investors in this thread (myself included) are not active traders. We’re here to buy and hold, buy through the dips, and then slowly sell in our retirement. That’s a
long time for most people, more than enough time to ride out downturns.
So coming in here and telling us that US equities might dip over the next couple years is just going to get (metaphorical) rotten fruit chucked at you, because you’re talking to the wrong audience.