“We won’t make it!!” The Incredible Story of Singapore Airlines Flight 319

seePyou

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2000
Messages
14,646
Reaction score
2,592


https://www.straitstimes.com/singap...et-forced-to-land-in-batam-with-very-low-fuel

Updated
October 31, 2023 at 10:29 AM



SINGAPORE – Investigations into a 2022 incident where a Singapore Airlines plane made an unscheduled landing in Batam with critically low levels of fuel found that those involved could have handled the situation better.
Flight SQ319, which was heading to Singapore from London on Oct 25, 2022, was diverted from Changi Airport due to bad weather at the time.
An investigation report on the incident said the flight crew appeared to prefer landing in Changi, even though an earlier diversion would have allowed them to land in Batam under better conditions.
The weather over Batam later deteriorated, forcing the pilots who had already declared a fuel emergency to abort their initial approach.
One of the pilots then tried to perform an automated landing from the other direction and was startled by a message from his flight display saying that he was not permitted to do so.
The pilots also did not realise that they had failed to contact the air traffic control tower in Batam, and did not get clearance to land on one of their initial attempts. The plane landed only on their fourth try.


There were 280 people on board Flight SQ319 at the time, according to the incident report by the Transport Safety Investigation Bureau (TSIB) published on Sept 25. No one was injured, and there was no damage to the Boeing 777-300ER aircraft.

On Saturday, in response to queries, the Civil Aviation Authority of Singapore (CAAS) said there were shortcomings in the way that the flight diversion was handled.
However, there were no regulatory breaches by SIA, said Mr Alan Foo, senior director of the safety regulation group at CAAS.
According to CAAS safety regulations, which apply to any aircraft operated by a Singapore operator, a flight must be planned such that it is able to land at its destination with a certain amount of fuel left.

Called “final reserve fuel”, or FRF, this is the absolute minimum required for an aircraft to remain airborne safely, in case of delays.
The pilot in command of the plane must monitor fuel levels throughout the flight and take appropriate action, such as adjusting the flight route, if the FRF may be depleted.
 

Philipkee

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Jun 8, 2013
Messages
26,539
Reaction score
15,678
These are only the exposed incidents

dunno how many compromised flights they covered up oredi...
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Avianca_Flight_052

This was a knn incident. I saw the documentary. Cos the pilot said they were low on fuel but did not use the specific word emergency they were ordered to keep going around until it crashed.

It’s akin to a doctor saying the family said the patient was dying, heart like not beating but because the word cardiac arrest was not used, CPR was not started.
 

orwell76

Greater Supremacy Member
Joined
May 18, 2006
Messages
83,514
Reaction score
8,479
Pattern is full, always ask the inbound aircraft to circle over Changi airport
 

signinj

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2022
Messages
1,915
Reaction score
697
will continue paying premium to fly sq despite the anecdotal account of a aeronautical near miss because moi ish unthinking and crowd-following sheep
 

TehOPengSiuDai

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Jan 6, 2018
Messages
13,147
Reaction score
8,494


https://www.straitstimes.com/singap...et-forced-to-land-in-batam-with-very-low-fuel

Updated
October 31, 2023 at 10:29 AM



SINGAPORE – Investigations into a 2022 incident where a Singapore Airlines plane made an unscheduled landing in Batam with critically low levels of fuel found that those involved could have handled the situation better.
Flight SQ319, which was heading to Singapore from London on Oct 25, 2022, was diverted from Changi Airport due to bad weather at the time.
An investigation report on the incident said the flight crew appeared to prefer landing in Changi, even though an earlier diversion would have allowed them to land in Batam under better conditions.
The weather over Batam later deteriorated, forcing the pilots who had already declared a fuel emergency to abort their initial approach.
One of the pilots then tried to perform an automated landing from the other direction and was startled by a message from his flight display saying that he was not permitted to do so.
The pilots also did not realise that they had failed to contact the air traffic control tower in Batam, and did not get clearance to land on one of their initial attempts. The plane landed only on their fourth try.


There were 280 people on board Flight SQ319 at the time, according to the incident report by the Transport Safety Investigation Bureau (TSIB) published on Sept 25. No one was injured, and there was no damage to the Boeing 777-300ER aircraft.

On Saturday, in response to queries, the Civil Aviation Authority of Singapore (CAAS) said there were shortcomings in the way that the flight diversion was handled.
However, there were no regulatory breaches by SIA, said Mr Alan Foo, senior director of the safety regulation group at CAAS.
According to CAAS safety regulations, which apply to any aircraft operated by a Singapore operator, a flight must be planned such that it is able to land at its destination with a certain amount of fuel left.

Called “final reserve fuel”, or FRF, this is the absolute minimum required for an aircraft to remain airborne safely, in case of delays.
The pilot in command of the plane must monitor fuel levels throughout the flight and take appropriate action, such as adjusting the flight route, if the FRF may be depleted.

SQ leh, how can. Pay such premium price for this kind of standard??
 

williewombat615

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2017
Messages
21,310
Reaction score
7,851
There was once I thought the plane I was on was landing but suddenly the plane went back up to the skies and we circled near to Changi for another 40 minutes or so before landing. The pilot never explain what happened.
 

coolad74

Supremacy Member
Joined
Dec 28, 2009
Messages
6,396
Reaction score
1,715
Never contact Batam ATC and want to land there. .. sounds like an untrained pilot leh
 
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts.

Please refer to our Community Guidelines and Standards, Terms of Service and Member T&Cs for more information.
Top