“We won’t make it!!” The Incredible Story of Singapore Airlines Flight 319

Acetone

Great Supremacy Member
Joined
May 20, 2005
Messages
62,800
Reaction score
13,999


https://www.straitstimes.com/singap...et-forced-to-land-in-batam-with-very-low-fuel

Updated
October 31, 2023 at 10:29 AM



SINGAPORE – Investigations into a 2022 incident where a Singapore Airlines plane made an unscheduled landing in Batam with critically low levels of fuel found that those involved could have handled the situation better.
Flight SQ319, which was heading to Singapore from London on Oct 25, 2022, was diverted from Changi Airport due to bad weather at the time.
An investigation report on the incident said the flight crew appeared to prefer landing in Changi, even though an earlier diversion would have allowed them to land in Batam under better conditions.
The weather over Batam later deteriorated, forcing the pilots who had already declared a fuel emergency to abort their initial approach.
One of the pilots then tried to perform an automated landing from the other direction and was startled by a message from his flight display saying that he was not permitted to do so.
The pilots also did not realise that they had failed to contact the air traffic control tower in Batam, and did not get clearance to land on one of their initial attempts. The plane landed only on their fourth try.


There were 280 people on board Flight SQ319 at the time, according to the incident report by the Transport Safety Investigation Bureau (TSIB) published on Sept 25. No one was injured, and there was no damage to the Boeing 777-300ER aircraft.

On Saturday, in response to queries, the Civil Aviation Authority of Singapore (CAAS) said there were shortcomings in the way that the flight diversion was handled.
However, there were no regulatory breaches by SIA, said Mr Alan Foo, senior director of the safety regulation group at CAAS.
According to CAAS safety regulations, which apply to any aircraft operated by a Singapore operator, a flight must be planned such that it is able to land at its destination with a certain amount of fuel left.

Called “final reserve fuel”, or FRF, this is the absolute minimum required for an aircraft to remain airborne safely, in case of delays.
The pilot in command of the plane must monitor fuel levels throughout the flight and take appropriate action, such as adjusting the flight route, if the FRF may be depleted.

Must be the bbfa never pay fat tax… better weigh everyone next time
 

galmongie

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Jul 21, 2021
Messages
16,764
Reaction score
9,220
That time my flight to bkk had to park at some military airbase to re-fuel because of bad weather at destination airport

Some passengers upon seeing the plane landed started taking their stuff from the overhead compartment
Maybe don't understand English lol
 

tauntme

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
May 15, 2011
Messages
11,313
Reaction score
4,290
It's really quite dangerous if u read the full article!!
 

GarnetDragon

Great Supremacy Member
Joined
May 13, 2021
Messages
69,620
Reaction score
137,694
legs-landing.gif
 

elvintay07

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Jan 4, 2022
Messages
11,988
Reaction score
4,293
It's really quite dangerous if u read the full article!!
Aiya. What to do? A lot of times company wants to save cost and asked pilot to land in SG because they got no ground team blah blah. Alternatively is pilot dk and refuse to follow the ground control’s instructions to say divert.

Normal one la. In the air, pilot is king mah. Those regulators are like paper tigers la. What can they do? Haha! In the end also say “crew could have done better” and all these talk cock situation
 

Hisashiburi

High Supremacy Member
Joined
May 12, 2012
Messages
26,713
Reaction score
8,504
These are only the exposed incidents

dunno how many compromised flights they covered up oredi...
Have public website to check.

Many incidents regarding sq that dont make the news.

Sq not as safe as people think.
 

Crooni

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2007
Messages
21,076
Reaction score
3,013
https://www.straitstimes.com/singap...et-forced-to-land-in-batam-with-very-low-fuel

On Saturday, in response to queries, the Civil Aviation Authority of Singapore (CAAS) said there were shortcomings in the way that the flight diversion was handled.

However, there were no regulatory breaches by SIA, said Mr Alan Foo, senior director of the safety regulation group at CAAS.

as usual all taichi no blame

from report, 3 flights in front all divert, only this one die die want to wait for changi. no mention if the 3 are sq or not

the botch landings at batam from the video is cos they short on fuel keep trying to cut the approach short
 

MiG123

Great Supremacy Member
Joined
Dec 12, 2007
Messages
55,662
Reaction score
9,629
Wonder who’s the pilot, usually sinkies quite kiasi and cautious one. Issit one of the talents they’ve been trying to hire from you know where or transferee from their AI/Vistara JV?
 

Evil_Boss

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Mar 1, 2013
Messages
47,521
Reaction score
17,549
Huh? Captain and first officer all pilots … so how come can happened? Captain newbie ah?

bad crew resource management.

usually is FO operate comms, capt fly.

but with the low fuel i think they were all panicking
 

keewee0415

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Jan 6, 2010
Messages
31,078
Reaction score
10,850
Not as satki as Captain Sully who landed his plane on the Hudson River after a bird strike.

He simply said "Unable" to all options thrown at him by the tower.

 

pwongkk

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Jun 30, 2006
Messages
28,774
Reaction score
14,220
Covid time never fly, skills rusty.

What are the rationality of the pilots?
 

erwinrommel

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2007
Messages
27,627
Reaction score
3,014
Have been a subscriber to Mentour pilot.

Very high quality videos from a real experienced commercial pilot. Learnt so much from him.
 

cute_togepi

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2012
Messages
21,288
Reaction score
4,149
https://avherald.com/h?comment=50f11fc3&opt=0

Quote from one poster:

"I was on this flight…
By GrumpyShrimp on Monday, Oct 2nd 2023 03:48Z

I happened to be on this flight and at the time couldn’t understand why they had not diverted to KLIA or Batam significantly earlier given the localise weather conditions.

Shortly after successful landing a short taxi was completed arriving near a gate, but before the doors were opened or a connecting bridge/stair way arrived, the aircraft lost all power, without warning. A refuelling was completed with passengers on board before attempting to restart the AGPU which ultimately failed. Later a ground generator arrived and provided external power which also continued to drop out frequently. In the end all passengers disembarked and were held until an engineering crew could be flown in from SIN. 30 minutes after engineering crew arrival the passengers reboarded, power restored and was able to take off.

Eventual arrival was 12+ hours after original scheduled arrival time."


F***, the plane had no fuel left, 0, nothing, zilch, after taxiing.
 
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts.

Please refer to our Community Guidelines and Standards, Terms of Service and Member T&Cs for more information.
Top